Mantle wrote:
No, Benghazi did NOT start as a result of a video. The video excuse was another Democrat “Diversion”—another of their lies, and when it was finally exposed, the MainStream Media (MSM) attitude, was, “Oh, well, that’s in the past,” and, essentially, was no big deal, just business as usual.
On the night of the Benghazi attack, I was online with an organization mainly composed of veterans and servicemen and their friends and families. We’d received word from aviators that their aircraft were loaded, they were dressed in full gear, aboard the aircraft, and their engines were running. The excitement—and fear of the unknown—had their adrenaline in high flow as they awaited the word from Obama to zoom off in full rescue mode. Frustration mounted as they kept waiting. They discussed taking off without authorization. We were all on tenterhooks for the men at Benghazi and for those chomping at the bit to execute the rescue. Finally, when it was going to be questionable as to whether they’d get there in time for a successful rescue, they got Obama’s message, but they were devastated: “Stand down!”
AND: In the Presidential debate in which Romney alluded to when Obama knew about Benghazi, Obama asserted that Romney was lying, saying that he (Obama) didn’t know about Benghazi or about the guys who could rescue them (I forget which; maybe both?) until it was too late.
I’ll never forget Romney’s face. He couldn’t believe that Obama had had the audacity to outright lie about it. I think that it had never occurred to Romney that Obama would even consider lying. Until that moment, I think that he had a good shot at winning the election, and was winning that particular debate.
Romney was about speechless at that point, and it was at that point that he lost that debate—and all possibility of election. Although Obama was the one who had lied, and had labeled Romney as a liar when, in fact, Romney had not lied at all, but Obama HAD lied, every single one of the sleazy MSM went right along with King Chutzpah. Business as usual.
Since the ambassador had repeatedly asked for more security over several months, but had receive zilch, and since we had notification in enough time that we COULD have saved those men, but didn’t, Hillary—or one of her minions—may have been instrumental in staging the attack? Why? I don’t know. To silence the ambassador? Because the ambassador and others who died were expendable in order to stage the attack? I don’t know, but the video as a reason for for the attack was mere Democrat subterfuge.
No, Benghazi did NOT start as a result of a video.... (
show quote)
And no liberal/socialist will respond to what you just wrote. They can’t. Well written, thanks.