.Newsmax.com
The 'Unintended Effects' of Government-Mandated Ethanol
The recent release of a United Nations report on corn ethanol has triggered new discussions on the benefits and drawbacks of the biofuel.
The report by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated that while biofuels do release smaller amounts of greenhouse gases than gasoline or diesel, "for some biofuels indirect emissions including from land use change can lead to greater total emissions than when using petroleum products."
Moreover, the negative consequences of including corn ethanol in the fuel supply are enormous.
In 2000, more than 90 percent of the corn grown in the United States went to feed people and livestock, including many people in undeveloped countries, and less than 5 percent was used to produce ethanol.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 dictated that gasoline contain a minimum volume of renewable fuels. By 2013, 40 percent of the corn crop went to produce ethanol, 45 percent fed livestock, and just 15 percent was used for foods and beverages, according to a report from Forbes.
On average, one bushel of corn can produce nearly three gallons of ethanol. This year the United States which produces 40 percent of the world's corn and accounts for 70 percent of worldwide corn imports will use nearly 5 billion bushels to produce more than 13 billion gallons of ethanol fuel.
The corn needed to fill a 25-gallon gas tank with ethanol could feed one person for a year, "so the amount of corn used to make that 13 million gallons will not feed the almost 500 million people it was feeding in 2000. This is the entire population of the Western Hemisphere outside the United States," observed Forbes contributor James Conca.
In 2007, the global price of corn doubled due to the increase in ethanol production, leading to increases in the price of milk, cheese, eggs, meat, cereals, and corn-based sweeteners, and world grain reserves dwindled to their lowest level in over 30 years.
Increased corn prices can also impact a surprising array of other products, including toothpaste, cosmetics, shampoo, and adhesives.
"Additional unintended effects from the increase in ethanol production include the dramatic rise in land rents," as well as an increase in the natural gas and chemicals used for fertilizers, over-pumping of aquifers, and clear-cutting of forests to plant corn crops, Forbes reported.
There have also been reports of vehicles' fuel systems being damaged by the use of ethanol, Bloomberg Businessweek reported.
As for the rationale to counter all these negative effects, the International Institute for Sustainable Development has estimated that the CO2 and climate benefits from replacing petroleum fuels with biofuels like ethanol are "basically zero."
the biofuels industries give millions of $ to both democrats and repulican parties to keep this no value product in fuel,anthing for money our president and congress
Elwood wrote:
.Newsmax.com
The 'Unintended Effects' of Government-Mandated Ethanol
The recent release of a United Nations report on corn ethanol has triggered new discussions on the benefits and drawbacks of the biofuel.
The report by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated that while biofuels do release smaller amounts of greenhouse gases than gasoline or diesel, "for some biofuels indirect emissions including from land use change can lead to greater total emissions than when using petroleum products."
Moreover, the negative consequences of including corn ethanol in the fuel supply are enormous.
In 2000, more than 90 percent of the corn grown in the United States went to feed people and livestock, including many people in undeveloped countries, and less than 5 percent was used to produce ethanol.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 dictated that gasoline contain a minimum volume of renewable fuels. By 2013, 40 percent of the corn crop went to produce ethanol, 45 percent fed livestock, and just 15 percent was used for foods and beverages, according to a report from Forbes.
On average, one bushel of corn can produce nearly three gallons of ethanol. This year the United States which produces 40 percent of the world's corn and accounts for 70 percent of worldwide corn imports will use nearly 5 billion bushels to produce more than 13 billion gallons of ethanol fuel.
The corn needed to fill a 25-gallon gas tank with ethanol could feed one person for a year, "so the amount of corn used to make that 13 million gallons will not feed the almost 500 million people it was feeding in 2000. This is the entire population of the Western Hemisphere outside the United States," observed Forbes contributor James Conca.
In 2007, the global price of corn doubled due to the increase in ethanol production, leading to increases in the price of milk, cheese, eggs, meat, cereals, and corn-based sweeteners, and world grain reserves dwindled to their lowest level in over 30 years.
Increased corn prices can also impact a surprising array of other products, including toothpaste, cosmetics, shampoo, and adhesives.
"Additional unintended effects from the increase in ethanol production include the dramatic rise in land rents," as well as an increase in the natural gas and chemicals used for fertilizers, over-pumping of aquifers, and clear-cutting of forests to plant corn crops, Forbes reported.
There have also been reports of vehicles' fuel systems being damaged by the use of ethanol, Bloomberg Businessweek reported.
As for the rationale to counter all these negative effects, the International Institute for Sustainable Development has estimated that the CO2 and climate benefits from replacing petroleum fuels with biofuels like ethanol are "basically zero."
.Newsmax.com br br The 'Unintended Effects' of G... (
show quote)
Elwood,
This is just one of many examples of Federal government programs that has been very SUCCESSFUL at its real intended purpose (it has transferred MUCH taxpayer money to the politicians and their friends and is now making them richer with a captive/mandated market).
The damage done by unintended consequences is also very typical of government mandated programs, (usually followed by doubling the program - doing the same thing and expecting different results).
You thought it was intended to help reduce foreign oil imports and/or help the environment?
That was just the selling spiel for the uninformed/don't care crowd.
If energy independence and reduced emissions were a goal of this administration/energy/state department the Keystone pipeline would be in operation now, the fracking process would be approved, and exploration and drilling would be allowed on offshore federally controlled areas.
CRONY CAPITALISM AT ITS BEST (WORST?). How long before we wake up ? (It's just a dream, right?, we aren't really this stupid, are we?)
1oldgeezer
1OldGeezer wrote:
Elwood,
This is just one of many examples of Federal government programs that has been very SUCCESSFUL at its real intended purpose (it has transferred MUCH taxpayer money to the politicians and their friends and is now making them richer with a captive/mandated market).
The damage done by unintended consequences is also very typical of government mandated programs, (usually followed by doubling the program - doing the same thing and expecting different results).
You thought it was intended to help reduce foreign oil imports and/or help the environment?
That was just the selling spiel for the uninformed/don't care crowd.
If energy independence and reduced emissions were a goal of this administration/energy/state department the Keystone pipeline would be in operation now, the fracking process would be approved, and exploration and drilling would be allowed on offshore federally controlled areas.
CRONY CAPITALISM AT ITS BEST (WORST?). How long before we wake up ? (It's just a dream, right?, we aren't really this stupid, are we?)
1oldgeezer
Elwood, br br This is just one of many examples o... (
show quote)
:thumbup: :thumbup: Personally I always thought that it was a massive rip off and an inefficient way to make ethanol.
Elwood wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: Personally I always thought that it was a massive rip off and an inefficient way to make ethanol.
Elwood,
I apologize if my post sounded like it was directed at you, that wasn't intended, I knew you knew the score.
Thanks for your post.
1oldgeezer
1OldGeezer wrote:
Elwood,
I apologize if my post sounded like it was directed at you, that wasn't intended, I knew you knew the score.
Thanks for your post.
1oldgeezer
No problem. :thumbup: :-D
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.