Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Without understanding the other side it is almost impossible to debate... Just two voices butting heads... In any case, I prefer to look upon this as a discussion...
I agree...I also like the term discussion better than debate concerning converstions with you. This really is refreshing, thanks for reminding me of my original purpose for getting involved with this type of website.
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
We agree concerning school choice and there being too many snowflakes these days... On the other hand, with so many denominations and faiths it would be difficult to choose a school prayer that would suit the majority of the student body... Plus there would be the issue of competing faiths... Would we allow Buddhist children or muslims to perform their rather more public and vocal forms of prayer?
I prefer to think that all individuals have the power of silent prayer... And that nothing the school system can do can stop child from praying in this manner....
We agree concerning school choice and there being ... (
show quote)
The reason I said it should be up to the individual teachers is to keep the group involved small. That lowers the chances of competing faiths. But if there still are too many, then the class can simply refrain from praying. Personally I think school prayer is about as far down on the priority list for public school issues as possible. It would be much better to concentrate on making the schools educate.
As for silent prayer, that's not even part of the school prayer 'issue', for the reasons you stated.
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Firstly... You have good taste in music...
LOL - thanks. You do too. Are you familiar with John Prine?
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Second, yes, I quite agree.... Taxes are a necessary evil (joke)... But they can also be used to abuse and restrict the population... I believe your Nation is founded upon this notion, no?
Yes. Taxes, and the tax code, are used for many purposes including restrictions and incentives. Most governments consider home ownership as beneficial to society, hence mortgage tax deductions and government-backed loans. Solar industry lobbyists bribe politicians to give tax deductions to people who buy solar panels and Tesla's. There are 'sin taxes' to restrict the use of things like alcohol and tobacco. Then there's the tax code itself, which (at least in the USA) is purposefully so complicated and self-contradictory that virtually everybody can be arrested for tax fraud or evasion at any time. (Think Al Capone)
But to answer your original question, as the song states, the mines, the mills and the factories are for the good of us all. Hence corporate tax deductions and incentives.
Remember too, corporations just pass the taxes they pay on to their customers through increased prices. The general public benefits when corporations pay less in taxes.
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
That has been my experience as well... I think that feminism (like many -isms) started out well... But became a crusade for some...
I agree, in fact I was going to say something like that in my first response, but couldn't think of a good way to word it. You did.
It seems we agree about far more than we disagree, which isn't at all surprising. Libertarians, like me, have far more in common with conservatives, like you, than with leftists.