One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Thoughts - Controversial Topics?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 7 next> last>>
Mar 3, 2020 21:58:05   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Roamin' Catholic wrote:
hi, what a great topic, posts and replies by so many! This is my first time participating in OPP so this reply is a practice run for me to become adept at replying.

Roamin' Catholic


Welcome... Hope you enjoy the OPP... Lots of great folk here...

Reply
Mar 3, 2020 22:12:23   #
Armageddun Loc: The show me state
 
TexaCan wrote:
Only the return of our Lord and Savior will solve these problems!😂😂😂😂😂



Reply
Mar 3, 2020 22:29:27   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I was hoping someone would do the list...

Let's get started...


I notice you've responded to several of my points with questions. That's a smart debating tactic. This could be interesting...

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

One might argue that the existence of God had been proven numerous times... In any case, your stance doesn't resoove the conflict that surrounds the issue... Example: prayer in school...


One might also argue the existence of God had been disproven numerous times as well, but it would also be a facetious argument. The fact remains there is no way to prove or disprove it.

But you're right, it doesn't resolve the prayer in school issue, nor did it address it. I think that's actually a school issue, not a religious one. In my ideal world all schools would be private and therefore immune from govt prayer edicts. Parents could choose the schools with the religious affiliation (or lack of) that fit their family.

In the real world there are public schools and I think the issue of prayer in the classroom should be up to either each teacher or maybe the school principal. I think it should be determined by the majority of students or parents (depending on age) if the day should begin and/or end with an openly recited prayer. I think any student that wishes to join in, in classrooms where it happens, should be allowed to do so. I think any student that does not wish to join in, should be free to refrain and sit quietly while the others are reciting the prayer. I think anybody who thinks those who refrain are somehow harmed by having to hear a prayer is mentally unfit. Any student who is 'triggered' by hearing a prayer in school is oversensitive and needs that so they can be desensitized in order to be able to function in future life. I say all this as an agnostic with no religious affiliation. In such a situation I would be a refrainer, and unharmed.

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Why do people insist upon the false argument that there never was s Palestinian state? By this logic, no new Nation could ever emerge....Israel didn't exist for some 2,000 years either.. And perhaps one should ask why they are trying to kill each other?


Regarding your first question, pretty much everything I've read about the issue states there was never a Palestinian state, but I'm not an expert on the subject so I could be wrong, but that becomes mute with your second sentence, with which I agree.

As for why, the main reason seems to be Islam. Palestians kill Israelies because their religion commands it, and Israelies kill Palestians to stop them. Then there's revenge to boot.

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Agreed.. Necessary... But to what extent and for what? Is income tax an acceptable tax? Why should their be loopholes for large corporations... And look at how they're often spent...


Taxes are one subset of the bigger question you're actually asking here, which is the purpose and scope of government. That must first be established before the funding method for it can or should be determined, as well as whether the taxation is progressive or regressive.

This may sound a bit off track, but bear with me...I'm a huge music fan and an amateur musician, so music has always been a big part of my life. One of my favorite musicians is a countryman of yours, Gordon Lightfoot. One of his songs is called "Canadian Railroad Trilogy" (you can find it on YouTube if interested). There is a line in it that goes "They sailed upon her waterways and they walked the forests tall; built the mines, the mills, and the factories for the good of us all". Do you agree with that sentiment?

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Haven't met many feminists? Generalization is rarely accurate... The feminist movement has brought about many necessary changes...


I've met my share. Some were fun, others shrill, a few insufferable. Remember, "unattractive" doesn't necessarily mean physically unattractive. I can think of several physically beautiful women whom I want nothing to do with. They wouldn't get far on their own merits.

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Why would parents have any more right to mutilate a baby boy than a baby girl?


I've never heard it described as mutilation regarding boys, but maybe you're right. I honestly don't know and don't care. I am completely disinterested in this topic.

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Haven't met many Muslims?


Why, are they all exactly the same? (just kidding)

The number of Muslims I've met is irrelevant. What is relevant is that Muslims are the only religious sect in this day and age that will riot in the streets and murder people (including other Muslims) because some newspaper they never heard of in some FOREIGN COUNTRY published a CARTOON they didn't like. Islam maintains an entire infrastructure to support and create those lunatic extremists. Yes, I am aware that they are a tiny percentage of the entire Muslim community, but they ARE sanctioned by official Islam, and a tiny percentage of a few billion is a lot of lunatic extremists.

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I don't know about that... PC has gone a long way to eliminating free speech... And Even in America there are guidelines for it...


I agree. PC is the method of choice for eliminating free speech. A worse one is laws against hate-speech, whatever that is, which the leftists are implementing in the US. Hopefully one day the supreme court will hear a case regarding those and rule them unconstitutional, as they clearly are.

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Climate is always changing... And it is important to understand all factors involved.. Whether we wish to or not, we as a species will adapt or perish...


That's true, and most would agree that the climate is warming in the nothern hemisphere, as it has been since the end of the little ice age. But the controversy is about AGW, whether the climate is changing faster now due to mankind burning fossil fuels, or not. The scaremongers say it is. The raw data shows otherwise.

Then there's the question of whether more warming would be beneficial or detrimental. The scaremongers say detrimental. Well, okay, actually they say somewhere between catastrophic and cataclysmic (because, well, scaremongers). The facts show some beneficial results, some detrimental. Certainly Canada is better off now than when it was buried under hundreds of feet of ice, right?

Finally there's the question of whether we can stop the climate from warming. The scaremongers and skeptics agree on this, with both saying we can't. They all agree the most we can do is lessen the rise in temperatures by the year 2100 by an insignificantly tiny amount. Oddly, despite it being futile and at a cost of the entire world economy, the scaremongers want to try anyway. I wonder why.

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Would you follow this rule for murder, as long as it didn't involve your friends or family?


No, but I might if it did. (joke)

Reply
 
 
Mar 3, 2020 23:41:14   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Voice of Reason wrote:
No, but I might if it did. (joke)




Most excellent...

I realize that it is quite late in the US, so I am going to refrain from immediately responding and wait until morning... This should allow some of the other members to engage...

Truly, this is how I wish all conversations on the OPP could go... Individuals exchanging information and viewpoints... No insults or slurs....

Gratitude

Reply
Mar 3, 2020 23:52:50   #
EmilyD
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:


Most excellent...

I realize that it is quite late in the US, so I am going to refrain from immediately responding and wait until morning... This should allow some of the other members to engage...

Truly, this is how I wish all conversations on the OPP could go... Individuals exchanging information and viewpoints... No insults or slurs....

Gratitude
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)

Ditto, Canuckus....it's nice when those of us who disagree can still be able to converse and then basically agree to disagree. I like when that happens in a thread.

Reply
Mar 4, 2020 05:49:19   #
Big Kahuna
 
EmilyD wrote:
Yup! Agree!....although permafrost is a close second, and AirforceOne, third.....


I think I would put Perm 1st. I think Kevy is younger and lacks wisdom because of his age. Perm, on the other hand, should know better by now that marxism and the demorat party is not the answer but is the problem. He still lacks wisdom at his old age.

Reply
Mar 4, 2020 06:03:13   #
Big Kahuna
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Would you follow this rule for murder, as long as it didn't involve your friends or family?


That ought to do it



Another question might be, why did Israel cease to exist for 2,000 years and then become a nation again??? Why is it that Israel is the only nation in history to have existed, then non-existed, then existed again?? Could this prove the existence of God and his prophets who predicted this exact thing in the Bible??? Check out Isaiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Revelation, and numerous other Biblical scripture that talks about the Jewish people being scattered to all parts of the world with no country and then being put back together as a country in the end times. The Romans destroyed the Jewish land of Israel. Israel became a country again in 1948. Proof of God?? Very well might be.

Reply
 
 
Mar 4, 2020 07:26:15   #
Thaddeus
 
This is a nice piece of writing

Reply
Mar 4, 2020 08:21:16   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Thaddeus wrote:
This is a nice piece of writing


So far a decent thread...

Welcome...

Don't be shy about posting...

Lots of fun folk here

Reply
Mar 4, 2020 10:16:09   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
10 Topics Guaranteed to Start an Argument
MORRIS M.
Listverse. com

One of the great things about the internet is the way it opens up debate. Now we don’t just read a news story, we actively get involved below the line—broadcasting our opinion to millions. At its best, this sort of ‘below the line’ activity can throw up more interesting points than the article itself. At its worst… well, you only have to look at stories on any of these topics to see how opinions can polarize. For instance, good luck finding a rational debate on:

10. The Existence of God
One of humanity’s most-enduring questions is: ‘is there a God?’ For millennia, people have fought and killed each other over the issue and wasted a ton of ink justifying their opinions. So you’d think by now we’d have learned to debate the question sensibly. In reality, nothing could be further from the truth.The trouble is, both sides (atheists and believers) have their minority of fundamentalists who will do their level-best to ‘win’ the argument by being as condescending as possible. Atheists accuse their religious counterparts of ‘believing in sky fairies’ and compare religious upbringing to child abuse; while the religious faction simply resort to attacking the concept of science.The weird thing is, most of us have probably met plenty of atheists and believers and never encountered a single lunatic. From personal experience, I know my Christian and atheist friends largely respect each other’s opinions and never try to ‘convert’ others to their side. In fact, watching a debate between these guys would likely be genuinely informative—so why is it only the diehards who ever make it onto message boards?

9. The Israel/Palestine Question
Around the world, there are dozens of ‘contested’ territories: Northern Ireland, Kashmir, the Falklands, Gibraltar and the Western Sahara, to name a few. Many of them have long, turbulent histories, periodically spill over into violence and one of them (Kashmir) nearly triggered a nuclear war. So why is it only the disputed Israeli/Palestinian border that whips up such emotion?Let’s be clear here: I’m not saying there’s nothing to get worked up about. The situation is undoubtedly tense, not-helped by such things as rocket attacks on Israel, Israeli airstrikes, the seizure of Palestinian land and the violently anti-Semitic propaganda prevalent in the region. If you have to deal with it on a daily basis it’s only natural you’d form a strong opinion. But what’s puzzling is how the entire internet has chosen this specific land-dispute to jump onto—and invested it with such emotion that rational argument becomes impossible.

8. Taxation
Tax is more-or-less a fact of life: none of us want to pay it, most of us don’t like what it gets spent on, but most of us use some of the stuff it buys—so we begrudgingly pay up. If we think about it much beyond that, it’s probably because we’ve either heard about some company refusing to pay a single cent; or some dumb government introducing a ridiculously unfair rate. But mention taxation on a message board and watch the lunatics come crawling out the woodwork.Now, to be fair, I’ve voiced some strong opinions on tax on these very pages. So feel free to call me a hypocrite. But I’ve never argued for a one hundred percent tax rate or literally equated taxation with slavery—which is what you’ll hear on any forum devoted to the topic. Like everything else on this list, it seems to be only the extremists who leave comments on these articles: the beret-wearing Che Guevara wanabees and Ayn Rand worshippers.

7. Feminism
As much as people like to get their hackles up at the thought of atheists and Christians or that chunk that comes out their paycheck each month, nothing compares to the vitriol evoked by feminism. Simply put: a good deal of the population seem to see the term as an invite to either spew violent misogyny or get into an oppression competition. And that’s before we even get onto the various strands of feminism that spend more time attacking each other than the patriarchy.Now, if we’re being honest, there are some forms of feminism that really do suck. Equally, a lot of serious articles about ‘men’s issues’ often get shouted down under sarcastic calls of ‘lolz what about teh menz?’ But the sheer hatred feminism seems to stir up is way out of proportion to any of this. After all, the basic concept is something we should all be able to get behind. For example: do you think everyone deserves equal pay for equal work, the freedom to make their own life choices and to live without the threat of violence, no matter what type of genitals they have? Then congratulations: you’re a feminist.

6. Circumcision
There are two types of circumcision: male and female. Female circumcision is better known by its more-truthful name ‘female genital mutilation’ (fgm) and everyone pretty-much agrees it’s a really bad thing. Male circumcision, on the other hand, is an absolute powder keg.That last link, by the way, goes to a representative article on the subject—if you have time, follow it and check the comments. That’s how most discussions about circumcision look: a whole mass of people screaming child abuse, threatening to call the police and comparing the practice to witch burning. To clarify: I’m not trying to take sides here. If you have a particular bugbear about this issue, that’s your opinion and I’ll respect that. But for the life of me, I can’t see why this particular issue might drive people into a howling frenzy. Yet venture below the line on any article mentioning it, and that’s exactly what you’ll see.

5. Islam
Sticking the word ‘Islam’ in an article is like lobbing a hand grenade into a hornet’s nest. Simply put: a lot of people have some very strong opinions on the subject—and they’re not afraid to let you know it. Unlike some of the entries here, the reason is pretty clear: a decade of news stories linking radical Islam to bomb attacks, assassinations and violent riots have left most of us in no doubt that we need to tackle religious extremism.But debates on Islam rarely focus on ‘extremism’. For whatever reason, a vocal minority of our online community have gotten used to speaking about it as a monolithic entity: as if there’s no difference between, say, a moderate Indonesian leading a regular life and a Sudanese extremist. What’s weird is how this rarely applies to any other religion. Can you imagine someone seriously being unable to differentiate between Oprah and Fred Phelps because they’re both Christian; or between Jerry Seinfeld and a member of Israel’s Ultra-Orthodox community? Well, apparently that’s how some people view 1.6bn of their fellow human beings.

4. Freedom of Speech
If there’s one thing the internet loves, it’s freedom of speech. We’re kinda libertarians in that respect: there’s little more likely to invoke the wrath of Anonymous than a serious attempt to curtail our right to it. However, it’s often taken as read that this freedom extends to anything and everything; and not everyone agrees.See, although freedom of speech may be enshrined in American law—to the extent that even scum like Westboro Baptist Church are constitutionally protected—the same logic does not apply elsewhere. In Germany, for example, it’s a criminal offense to display a Nazi flag and you WILL do time for it. In France, denying the holocaust can get you a prison sentence. The online clash usually comes when American ideology crashes up against European—with neither side willing to accept their system isn’t ‘best’. So let’s be honest here: free speech may be an idea worth fighting for, but just because parts of Europe have taken a different route on certain subjects does not make them any less ‘free’. Minor restrictions do not automatically make an Orwellian dystopia—any less than total freedom automatically results in the anarchic Wild West.

3. Climate Change
Most scientists wish the public would get excited about their chosen field. Mention awe-inspiring concepts like string theory, Hawking radiation or gravitons to the man on the street and he’ll probably go out of his way to avoid you. For climate scientists, however, it’s a case of ‘be careful what you wish for’.Thanks to decades of programs, books and blogs written on the subject, just about everyone now considers themselves an expert. And part of that expertise apparently involves shouting down the other side—bizarrely enough, for the exact same reason. Those who don’t believe in it see a vast conspiracy by scientists, liberals and other boogeymen to put us all in FEMA prison camps, while those who do see a vast conspiracy involving the Koch Brothers and big oil to manipulate the ‘sheeple’ into believing otherwise. It’s a perfect storm of paranoia centered around an issue most of us aren’t qualified to understand—and, every time someone brings it up, the sparks are sure to fly.

2. The Holocaust
As you may have noticed, I’ve tried to maintain a largely neutral tone on most of these. That won’t happen here. For whatever reason, despite the mountains of evidence and eyewitness testimony proving otherwise; there are still people out there who honestly believe the holocaust was either exaggerated or simply didn’t happen. And their brand of mental sickness is virulent enough to infect the comments section of any article that cares to mention it.There are a few things in the world that mark you out as a bad person; and denying the holocaust is one of them. It’s not just the extent of human suffering that occurred in moral blackholes like Auschwitz and Treblinka; or the sheer hatred required to send millions of Jews, gays, Poles and disabled people to certain death. It’s all that plus the stubborn refusal to learn from history—to pretend genocide never happened. And trust me, if there’s one mistake we never want to repeat from history, it’s this one.

1. Abortion
Here it is: the most-divisive issue you will ever encounter. With feelings running so high on both sides, it’s impossible to take any sort of stance on abortion without seeing the entire comment section explode in your face—so I’m remaining one hundred percent neutral on this one.You’re probably aware of the basic arguments. Pro-lifers believe with the utmost intensity that killing a fetus is as bad as killing a child. Pro-choice supporters believe with an identical passion that criminalizing abortion is State intrusion into women’s bodies, and completely incompatible with a free society. Politicians meanwhile try to search for a middle ground—a point where termination remains acceptable and a point where it unequivocally isn’t. But this is one argument that’s never going away: so long as there’s a human race it will continue to rage—and nowhere is this more apparent than on the internet. Now, I’m not going to make any value judgement on this, and I appreciate that people have strong feelings about it. But wouldn’t it be great if both sides could debate this and other issues—just once—without resorting to hysterical name-calling? I guess we’ll find out in the comments.
10 Topics Guaranteed to Start an Argument br MORR... (show quote)


WELL, you've gone and done it now. Boy oh boy you know you could sell tickets to any of these events

Reply
Mar 4, 2020 10:23:06   #
hdjimv Loc: South Dakota
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
So far a decent thread...

Welcome...

Don't be shy about posting...

Lots of fun folk here



Reply
 
 
Mar 4, 2020 10:37:29   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
Thaddeus wrote:
This is a nice piece of writing


Well hello, Thaddeus welcome to opp. Get your tough skin out we can have rough seas at times. At any given time one or all will piss u off but go get a cup of coffee and then dive back in. And when your responding to someone hit the quote reply and your answer will show up with theirs then we know who you're talking to. Have fun

Reply
Mar 4, 2020 11:53:40   #
MeadowFields
 
You put your finger on 10 hot issues, but there's one more that I think should be included, however, it might fall under the general heading of religion and that is; after-life experiences or near-death experiences (NDE).
I've followed many of those you tube videos on NDEs and there's something going on for sure that's unexplainable by science or through critical thinking. I have a science background (engineering) but I firmly believe that there are mysteries beyond our knowledge and comprehension that has yet to be discovered.
Your ten most controversial topics were spot on and enjoyed reading your comments.

Reply
Mar 4, 2020 12:12:10   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
Roamin' Catholic wrote:
hi, what a great topic, posts and replies by so many! This is my first time participating in OPP so this reply is a practice run for me to become adept at replying.

Roamin' Catholic


Clever screen name! I like it.

Welcome to the forum. If you want to direct a reply to a particular person, and have the post you're responding to quoted in a box like this one, use the 'quote reply' button as opposed to the 'reply' one.

Reply
Mar 4, 2020 12:25:29   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Most excellent...

I realize that it is quite late in the US, so I am going to refrain from immediately responding and wait until morning... This should allow some of the other members to engage...

Truly, this is how I wish all conversations on the OPP could go... Individuals exchanging information and viewpoints... No insults or slurs....

Gratitude


There's no need to express gratitude for common courtesy, despite its rarity on this (and probably most other) forums. I usually try to treat other participants with respect unless and until they indicate they don't deserve it. You haven't done that, and I suspect and hope you won't. It is nice to have a rational conversation among a sea of stupidity, invective and outright hatred.

One thing I'm embarrassed about, after posting my long response I reread it after it was too late to edit, and realized I used the word 'mute' when I meant 'moot'. I do know better so please forgive my temporary ignorance.

I'll look forward to your responses to my long post...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.