One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Come on Christians, It’s Time To Let Go of Your Aversion to Gays
Page <<first <prev 16 of 26 next> last>>
Feb 29, 2020 18:45:48   #
elledee
 
Kevyn wrote:
There is not a commandment against homosexuality but their is one against adultery, getting pissed on by russian hookers is sort of a grey area biblically speaking.


there's one about bearing false witness too..... smart ass

Reply
Feb 29, 2020 19:11:58   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
padremike wrote:
I never spent time trying to decipher scripture with my secret decoder ring regarding the end times. I know there are many who dwell on end time prophecy. The Eschatological Discourse - death, judgment, heaven or hell was more important to me for living in the present and looking towards my final end. I know the only place God is present and active for us is in the here and now. (It's comforting to know without question He is always immediately there for us.) However, we must acknowledge that the overwhelming and accepted evil we witness today, not only in America but common now to our entire world, occurred in such a relative short period of time that it goes beyond the natural order. The success of this viciously unleashed evil is supernatural in such a way that Holy Scripture warned us and we need to acknowledge it and combat as it evolves. It is vitally important for all Christian's of solid, uncompromising and understandings of our common faith, to put aside differences and work together: we are all under siege and Satan knows well how to divide and conquer. Many traditional denominations have already replaced sacred Christianity with social Christianity. I'm not the least concerned in one way inasmuch as we know Who has already won this spiritual warfare, but I am very concerned over those who will be lost. Christians must remain vigilant, courageous, and faithful together. I'm not preaching to the choir, but to others who may be following our conversation. 👍
I never spent time trying to decipher scripture wi... (show quote)


Good post

Particularly the start...

Reply
Feb 29, 2020 19:52:28   #
flash
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I agree that there is a lot of hypocrisy in the above situation....

I approve of neither... Nor do I condemn them...


You can't have it both ways. Make up your mind

Reply
 
 
Feb 29, 2020 20:10:31   #
Chamuco
 
PeterS wrote:
This one is for Blade Runner Why are you worried about the sanctity of marriage when you have a president who has been married 3 times, bedded down with porn stars and Playboy bunnies all because a pregnant wife couldn't be tolerated when weighed against his 'manly' needs.

But hey, two men who are devoted to each other are an abomination all while Trump is treated as a savior of this once great country.

Who presents a better example for the children of this nation to follow? Trump, who treats women as if they are exchangeable upon a whim or Pete Buttigieg who is devoted to his spouse and family and treats them as if they are first in his life?

It's funny how a single Episcopal Church of God can recognize who is a better representative for the children of this nation while the whole of the Evangelical kindom are blind to what is the glaring truth!
This one is for Blade Runner Why are you worried a... (show quote)


Meanwhile.., the whole of the "Liberal kingdom" seems to have an aversion to school prayer regardless of its' nondenominational origin.
Science has killed a hundred thousand times more people than has religion.
How about banning science in public schools.
Close-mindedness comes in all forms.

Reply
Feb 29, 2020 20:52:04   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
flash wrote:
You can't have it both ways. Make up your mind


Certainly one can...

It's called leaving judgement to God and worrying about one's own sins...

Reply
Feb 29, 2020 20:54:21   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Chamuco wrote:
Meanwhile.., the whole of the "Liberal kingdom" seems to have an aversion to school prayer regardless of its' nondenominational origin.
Science has killed a hundred thousand times more people than has religion.
How about banning science in public schools.
Close-mindedness comes in all forms.


It is impossible to remove prayer from the school system... Though public didplays can be banned...

I don't know how you figure science has killed more people than religion... Wars are not fought over science...

Reply
Feb 29, 2020 21:11:51   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
It looks as if we are debating 3 different topics:
1) Organized religion's rules of human conduct for the survival of civilization,
2) the existence of a God-Creator-Intelligent Designer as both religion and science.
3) the freedom of man to determine his own behavior.

Take a look at these YouTube videos on Darwinism vs Intelligent Design:
Discovery Center for Science and Culture, Stephen Meyer = director where Doug Axe works:

Uncommon Knowledge with Peter Robinson
Mathematical Challenges to Darwin's Theory of Evolution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noj4phMT9OE
re: Steve Meyer's new book: "Darwin's Doubt"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
Author Douglas Axe presents his book
Undeniable: How Biology Confirms Our Intuition That Life Is Designed
Streamed live on Jul 13, 2016
"A remarkable thing about evolutionary theory is the way it demands that we deny our intuition at almost every step. Evolutionists then assure us that the science is all figured out, so we needn't trouble our silly heads about the relevant biology. In his new book, Douglas Axe of Biologic Institute turns this standard assurance on its head. In Undeniable: How Biology Confirms Our Intuition That Life Is Designed (HarperOne 2016), Dr. Axe restores the place of intuition alongside intellect in considering the question of life's origins."

"About the Author:
"Douglas Axe is the director of Biologic Institute. His research uses both experiments and computer simulations to examine the functional and structural constraints on the evolution of proteins and protein systems. After a Caltech PhD he held postdoctoral and research scientist positions at the University of Cambridge, the Cambridge Medical Research Council Centre, and the Babraham Institute in Cambridge. His work and ideas have been featured in many scientific journals, including the Journal of Molecular Biology, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Nature, and in such books as Signature in the Cell and Darwin’s Doubt by Stephen Meyer and Life’s Solution by Simon Conway Morris."

Axe asks how hard it is for new genes and new proteins to evolve, especially randomly over time as postulated by Darwin. The Book offers Mathematical technical calculations, largely ignored by the current academic community, as well as intuition supporting an Intelligenct Designer - a creator. Axe argues that the educated elite are stuck in a hole of misinformation. Kids see the world in terms of design first, not defined by language, things are made, and cannot be made with out knowhow, not made by accident.

Biologist explains scientific challenges to Darwinian evolution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2grcHPo8oDQ
Published on Mar 22, 2013 short interview with Dough Axe.
Dr. Douglas Axe, director of Biologic Institute, will be a featured speaker at the fourth annual Westminster Conference on Science and Faith on April 5-6, 2013 at Covenant Fellowship Church in the greater Philadelphia area. This year's theme is "How Did It All Begin?" How did the universe begin? How did life start? How did complex living things arise? Explore these big questions and more at the conference. Details and registration available at www.scienceandgod.org/wts

The full title of Darwin's work "On the origin of species" is: "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life"

There is no doubt as to why Karl Marx, Jefferson Davis, and Robert E. Lee embraced Darwinism over Intelligent Design by an Intelligent Designer and our Declaration of Independence declaring all men created equal under God.

Just to obtain a functioning protein, the odds are with 150 amino acids 10 raised to the 77th power and to build a human genome, the odds are 1 trillion years raised to the 27th power, or the number 1 followed by 324 zeros. If the universe since Big Bang is only 14 billion years, and Earth is only 4 billion years old, random selection of genes via Darwin's theory of evolution in 1 trillion (27) power, is virtually impossible.

One celled animals are hermaphrodites, but the more complex animal kingdom emerged as male and female (love) amongst mammals, determining genetic selection, cutting the evolution process to less than 541 million years after the Cambrian explosion and the rise of humans to less than 2 million years.

Evolution is designed top down, not bottom up as with Darwin's "survival of the fittest" tree of life. How curious it is that the Democrats' "liberalism" censors the Discovery Institute theories but pushes Darwin's racist theories in evolution under the pretense of being non-racist. Man is given the gift of free agency, not to be en-captured in a gilded cage. We could end these gruesome wars if we wanted to.

Reply
Feb 29, 2020 21:21:05   #
Singularity
 
flash wrote:
You can't have it both ways. Make up your mind


There is merit in remaining open minded while learning. One wishes to avoid excessive gullibility vs crippling cynicism.

Reply
Mar 1, 2020 03:42:59   #
newbear Loc: New York City
 
whitnebrat wrote:
Ah ... a senior moment on my part ... thanks for the name.
Fundamental Buddhism (Theraveda) does not allow for a supreme being at all. Many of the subdivisions make deities of either Buddha or many of his acolytes for the masses to pray to, but the original intent was to not deify anybody. And as usual, your mileage may vary.


Somewhere else I wrote about the Chinese people in possession of gunpowder and not using it properly. The silence was deafening, Kemmer said "huh"?

Well, it made my day, anyway, listening to all the impotent mystics on here. Mr. Alan Watts once attempted to school himself in Shinto and bring it to U.S.A. students, according to the priests who married my Japanese friend Masakazu Hori San in Kyoto way back when... His (Watts') writings became a required reading as well as Kalil Gibhran in our Ivy League institutions whose product tries to govern us today. Why the endless search for the true god still continues???

Reply
Mar 1, 2020 03:46:46   #
newbear Loc: New York City
 
elledee wrote:
there's one about bearing false witness too..... smart ass


I was going to say that too, thanks. This one is very important and quite willfully ignored by our fellow Christians.

Reply
Mar 1, 2020 03:47:08   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
newbear wrote:
Somewhere else I wrote about the Chinese people in possession of gunpowder and not using it properly. The silence was deafening, Kemmer said "huh"?

Well, it made my day, anyway, listening to all the impotent mystics on here. Mr. Alan Watts once attempted to school himself in Shinto and bring it to U.S.A. students, according to the priests who married my Japanese friend Masakazu Hori San in Kyoto way back when... His (Watts') writings became a required reading as well as Kalil Gibhran in our Ivy League institutions whose product tries to govern us today. Why the endless search for the true god still continues???
Somewhere else I wrote about the Chinese people in... (show quote)


How did the Chinese use gunpowder improperly?

Reply
Mar 1, 2020 04:14:44   #
newbear Loc: New York City
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
How did the Chinese use gunpowder improperly?


The way you, Canuckus, use my comments improperly, ha ha.

Reply
Mar 1, 2020 04:29:11   #
flash
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Certainly one can...

It's called leaving judgement to God and worrying about one's own sins...


God also gave us the ability to make our OWN judgement and the ability to discern right from wrong

Reply
Mar 1, 2020 05:39:04   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
flash wrote:
God also gave us the ability to make our OWN judgement and the ability to discern right from wrong


So that we could condemn others?

Reply
Mar 1, 2020 05:41:43   #
Rose42
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
So that we could condemn others?


Pointing out what is sin or is not condemnation.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 16 of 26 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.