One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
The supposed new cure for climate change
Page 1 of 2 next>
Feb 20, 2020 01:31:00   #
2bltap Loc: Move to the Mainland
 
This is what is now being proposed by all of the climate change hoaxers like AOC, Sanders Gore and the rest. How about just outing a mask on cows?
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/HJkX8KnJl1c

Reply
Feb 20, 2020 05:35:40   #
flash
 
I guess the cows instead of buffalo should have been killed! 😂😂😂

Reply
Feb 20, 2020 06:04:56   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
flash wrote:
I guess the cows instead of buffalo should have been killed! 😂😂😂


Cow owners pay attention, potential profits from bottling methane.
You have milking machines.
Now you need a methane machine.

Reply
 
 
Feb 20, 2020 06:13:34   #
waltmoreno
 
2bltap wrote:
This is what is now being proposed by all of the climate change hoaxers like AOC, Sanders Gore and the rest. How about just outing a mask on cows?
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/HJkX8KnJl1c


Well Gore and Sanders want more than masks to catch those deadly, methane emitting cow burps. They also want your money so you can buy carbon offsets from them to atone for your sin of emitting CO2. You know, that deadly poison gas you exhale after inhaling O2. And which all plants need to inhale so they can exhale CO2.
Sounds like a pretty good racket, if you can pull it off!

Reply
Feb 20, 2020 07:12:35   #
Kevyn
 
2bltap wrote:
This is what is now being proposed by all of the climate change hoaxers like AOC, Sanders Gore and the rest. How about just outing a mask on cows?
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/HJkX8KnJl1c

For arguments sake let’s say we were to cut beef and pork consumption and production in the US in half, what would it achieve? For one thing half of the land used for grazing and stockyards could be used to grow either crops, forest or native grasslands. The amount of crops used to feed the cattle would be cut in half and that land could be used to grow fruit, vegetables and grain that directly fed Americans, a far more efficient and healthy diet. The health problems associated with excess consumption of red meat would be significantly reduced along with the associated cost. And because it is a reduction rather than elimination people like me who enjoy a good steak, burger or smothered pork chop would still do so just at fewer occasions. There really is not a downside at all unless you peddle fast food and would need to adjust your marketing program and change what you offer on the menu. Or if like two tapped you dream of a career capturing bovine farts and selling them.

Reply
Feb 20, 2020 07:40:26   #
American Vet
 
Kevyn wrote:
For arguments sake let’s say we were to cut beef and pork consumption and production in the US in half, what would it achieve? For one thing half of the land used for grazing and stockyards could be used to grow either crops, forest or native grasslands. The amount of crops used to feed the cattle would be cut in half and that land could be used to grow fruit, vegetables and grain that directly fed Americans, a far more efficient and healthy diet. The health problems associated with excess consumption of red meat would be significantly reduced along with the associated cost. And because it is a reduction rather than elimination people like me who enjoy a good steak, burger or smothered pork chop would still do so just at fewer occasions. There really is not a downside at all unless you peddle fast food and would need to adjust your marketing program and change what you offer on the menu. Or if like two tapped you dream of a career capturing bovine farts and selling them.
For arguments sake let’s say we were to cut beef a... (show quote)


Your plan sounds a lot like the Soviets "plans". Did you 'borrow' those ideas?

Reply
Feb 20, 2020 08:25:43   #
Kevyn
 
American Vet wrote:
Your plan sounds a lot like the Soviets "plans". Did you 'borrow' those ideas?


Actually the Soviets tried consistently to increase beef and pork production.

Reply
 
 
Feb 20, 2020 08:56:12   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
Kevyn wrote:
Actually the Soviets tried consistently to increase beef and pork production.


In USSR, more meat is not enough
November 21, 1984
Socialism at it's best
https://www.csmonitor.com/1984/1121/112123.html

Reply
Feb 20, 2020 09:24:08   #
EN Submarine Qualified Loc: Wisconsin East coast
 
America 1 wrote:
Cow owners pay attention, potential profits from bottling methane.
You have milking machines.
Now you need a methane machine.

How about a methane machine to power the milking machine?

Reply
Feb 20, 2020 11:34:39   #
flash
 
America 1 wrote:
Cow owners pay attention, potential profits from bottling methane.
You have milking machines.
Now you need a methane machine.


Well worth considering.

Reply
Feb 21, 2020 08:31:35   #
rebob14
 
Kevyn wrote:
For arguments sake let’s say we were to cut beef and pork consumption and production in the US in half, what would it achieve? For one thing half of the land used for grazing and stockyards could be used to grow either crops, forest or native grasslands. The amount of crops used to feed the cattle would be cut in half and that land could be used to grow fruit, vegetables and grain that directly fed Americans, a far more efficient and healthy diet. The health problems associated with excess consumption of red meat would be significantly reduced along with the associated cost. And because it is a reduction rather than elimination people like me who enjoy a good steak, burger or smothered pork chop would still do so just at fewer occasions. There really is not a downside at all unless you peddle fast food and would need to adjust your marketing program and change what you offer on the menu. Or if like two tapped you dream of a career capturing bovine farts and selling them.
For arguments sake let’s say we were to cut beef a... (show quote)


That doesn’t work anymore, Kev. The world already grows more than enough food to feed its population............farmers are paid to idle some fields. A solution to alleviate hunger needs to be politically derived, not one that impoverishes populations that are food secure.

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2020 14:16:44   #
FallenOak Loc: St George Utah
 
Kevyn wrote:
For arguments sake let’s say we were to cut beef and pork consumption and production in the US in half, what would it achieve? For one thing half of the land used for grazing and stockyards could be used to grow either crops, forest or native grasslands. The amount of crops used to feed the cattle would be cut in half and that land could be used to grow fruit, vegetables and grain that directly fed Americans, a far more efficient and healthy diet. The health problems associated with excess consumption of red meat would be significantly reduced along with the associated cost. And because it is a reduction rather than elimination people like me who enjoy a good steak, burger or smothered pork chop would still do so just at fewer occasions. There really is not a downside at all unless you peddle fast food and would need to adjust your marketing program and change what you offer on the menu. Or if like two tapped you dream of a career capturing bovine farts and selling them.
For arguments sake let’s say we were to cut beef a... (show quote)


Sir,
Animal are raised for meat in marginal agricultural area of the US. Plants do not do well in desert areas because of the need for water. You are wanting more aqueducts to bring scarce desert rivers to desert areas to grow plants? I grew Macadamia trees but they do not do well except along the coast of California on the continental US. Avocados only grow in hot houses during the winter in the rocky mountain states. The marginal lands of the US are OK for growing animals but farmers are smart enough to know that some crops just don't thrive in some areas.

Reply
Feb 21, 2020 15:00:08   #
waltmoreno
 
Fallen Oak, I see that you joined OPP about 5 months ago. Welcome.
Kevyn, a die-hard Never Trumper with a severe case of TDS is one of the resident OPP libs who is forever advancing government solutions to non existent problems. But when someone responds with obvious problems to their proposed solutions, they simply propose other solutions. Like building aqueducts to bring water to arid areas. Just a minor detail. Libs have no faith in the freedom of individuals or their ingenuity to solve real problems. Sad.

Reply
Feb 21, 2020 16:28:48   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
flash wrote:
Well worth considering.


Flash, my girlfriend is always late for anything hours to get ready never on time.
Bathtime 2-3 hours.
Somewhat funny.
I gave her the nickname flash.

Reply
Feb 21, 2020 17:02:41   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
America 1 wrote:
Flash, my girlfriend is always late for anything hours to get ready never on time.
Bathtime 2-3 hours.
Somewhat funny.
I gave her the nickname flash.


As everyone may know I have fishtanks galore in my office thus fish I breed them, have a contract. Anyway, the other day I was looking at the fries (babies) and looking at the bubbles. At first, I thought adjust the filter? No, fish farts. So imagine the ones at sea, whales even. Yes, perhaps that is our solution to the Climate Crisis hoax.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.