Hunter Biden specifically noted in indictment and investigation
Alexander Dubinsky MP specifically named Hunter Biden, son of former Vice President and current presidential candidate Joe Biden, as a beneficiary and recipient of the ill-gotten money. “Biden received money that did not come from the company’s successful operation but rather from money stolen from citizens,” he stated. According to indictment documents, Hunter Biden along with other Burisma board members collected over $16.5 million dollars of the funds in question. The other named board members are Alexander Kwasniewski, Alan Apter and Devon Archer.
“The son of Vice-President Joe Biden was receiving payment for his services, with money raised through criminal means and money laundering,” he then said, adding “Biden received money that did not come from the company’s successful operation but rather from money stolen from citizens.”
Hunter Biden specifically noted in indictment and investigation
Alexander Dubinsky MP specifically named Hunter Biden, son of former Vice President and current presidential candidate Joe Biden, as a beneficiary and recipient of the ill-gotten money. “Biden received money that did not come from the company’s successful operation but rather from money stolen from citizens,” he stated. According to indictment documents, Hunter Biden along with other Burisma board members collected over $16.5 million dollars of the funds in question. The other named board members are Alexander Kwasniewski, Alan Apter and Devon Archer.
“The son of Vice-President Joe Biden was receiving payment for his services, with money raised through criminal means and money laundering,” he then said, adding “Biden received money that did not come from the company’s successful operation but rather from money stolen from citizens.”
We'll see if anything comes of this. Somehow the dems and their cohorts ALWAYS walk, no matter what nefarious schemes they're part of...
In Trump's second term, I suspect he will be much more aggressive. At least, I hope he will be. These criminal elites should not be allowed to run free.
Hunter Biden specifically noted in indictment and investigation
Alexander Dubinsky MP specifically named Hunter Biden, son of former Vice President and current presidential candidate Joe Biden, as a beneficiary and recipient of the ill-gotten money. “Biden received money that did not come from the company’s successful operation but rather from money stolen from citizens,” he stated. According to indictment documents, Hunter Biden along with other Burisma board members collected over $16.5 million dollars of the funds in question. The other named board members are Alexander Kwasniewski, Alan Apter and Devon Archer.
“The son of Vice-President Joe Biden was receiving payment for his services, with money raised through criminal means and money laundering,” he then said, adding “Biden received money that did not come from the company’s successful operation but rather from money stolen from citizens.”
Hunter Biden specifically noted in indictment and investigation
Alexander Dubinsky MP specifically named Hunter Biden, son of former Vice President and current presidential candidate Joe Biden, as a beneficiary and recipient of the ill-gotten money. “Biden received money that did not come from the company’s successful operation but rather from money stolen from citizens,” he stated. According to indictment documents, Hunter Biden along with other Burisma board members collected over $16.5 million dollars of the funds in question. The other named board members are Alexander Kwasniewski, Alan Apter and Devon Archer.
“The son of Vice-President Joe Biden was receiving payment for his services, with money raised through criminal means and money laundering,” he then said, adding “Biden received money that did not come from the company’s successful operation but rather from money stolen from citizens.”
In Trump's second term, I suspect he will be much more aggressive. At least, I hope he will be. These criminal elites should not be allowed to run free.
The sites don't matter. What matters is the evidence they present.
Politico, a true fake news site, published a story in 2017 that stated that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election on Hilary's behalf. I didn't believe it at first until I saw a Ukrainian report that detailed charges against one of their own law makers doing exactly what Politico reported. Even fake news sites can get it right occasionally. You just need to check out the facts they present.