Realistic wrote:
Considering, if Trump would have come out and admitted the truth, none of it would have been required.
He was in the wrong, and that will never change, he is the 3rd President to be Impeached by the House...
He is quilty of far more...
The day after Nancy announced impeachment, Trump released the transcripts of his calls. That you say he did something wrong doesn't make it true. You can call him guilty as much as you want to.....doesn't make it true, though. I guess if it makes you feel better you can say it, but it sure makes you look foolish.
CarryOn wrote:
Trump released the transcript of the call. If there was anything impeachable about it that would have been a confession, but there was not.
He was acquitted by a majority in the Senate ... not just dismissed, but found "not guilty." Impeachment ... especially a totally partisan impeachment ... by the HOR means nothing if the charges are rejected by the Senate. It has meaning only to the hate-filled, conniving dems in the HOR who schemed to get the whole hoax started. It might give them a false sense of accomplishment. Other than that ... NADA!
Trump released the transcript of the call. If the... (
show quote)
he goes down in history as impeached, Fact
He did not release the transcript, that's still held against norms on a secret server, he released a child friendly version of his liking...
EmilyD wrote:
The day after Nancy announced impeachment, Trump released the transcripts of his calls. That you say he did something wrong doesn't make it true. You can call him guilty as much as you want to.....doesn't make it true, though. I guess if it makes you feel better you can say it, but it sure makes you look foolish.
sadly while you where ignoring the obvious, listening to the talking heads, he has said publicly, to china, to Russia, and to UK, he wanted them to investigate the Bidens, a political rival, on the run up to an election, if he had an issue with the Bidens why was this not done 3 years ago I ask you?
which he also did in the run up to the 2016 election, related to Clinton, using a foreign country to tamper with an election,
it takes no evidence to see the wrong in that. He admitted to defying congress publicly, repeatedly, again requiring no evidence, again wrong, constitutionally, and morally, and only done because of guilt.
why did he immediately have the dictation of his talks with Putin destroyed at the G-20, can only imagine...
Realistic wrote:
he goes down in history as impeached, Fact
He did not release the transcript, that's still held against norms on a secret server, he released a child friendly version of his liking...
The transcript was released in its entirety. Even the people involved who transcribed it testified that it accurately represented the phone call.
And the child-friendly version of the transcript was the one presented by shifty ... the version of his liking .... because the real deal didn't prove anything and he had nothing to offer as evidence.
Ergo the FOREVER ACQUITTAL ..
CarryOn wrote:
The transcript was released in its entirety. Even the people involved who transcribed it testified that it accurately represented the phone call.
And the child-friendly version of the transcript was the one presented by shifty ... the version of his liking .... because the real deal didn't prove anything and he had nothing to offer as evidence.
Ergo the FOREVER ACQUITTAL ..
he said we said I said you said, the original was hidden forever, and why would that be?
same reason the transcript of his meeting with Putin was destroyed.
Guilt
Realistic wrote:
he said we said I said you said, the original was hidden forever, and why would that be?
same reason the transcript of his meeting with Putin was destroyed.
Guilt
Sadly, you are not being the least bit realistic. There is no proof of any transcript other than the one released, which is the original. There is only your sad, desperate hope that there is more ...
Innocence.
Realistic wrote:
statistics say much different, if you have something that say otherwise please feel free
Trump in 3 years has spent more on golf alone than Obama spent on all travel and leasure in 8 years
After only nine months in office, President Trump and family had already spent $147 million on personal travel, amounting to one-and-a-half times as much as President Obama and family spent in the eight years of the latter's presidency.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-trump-travel-costs/You where saying
Get you facts straight before you bleed to death
statistics say much different, if you have somethi... (
show quote)
Soros owns Snopes try another.
Realistic wrote:
statistics say much different, if you have something that say otherwise please feel free
Trump in 3 years has spent more on golf alone than Obama spent on all travel and leasure in 8 years
After only nine months in office, President Trump and family had already spent $147 million on personal travel, amounting to one-and-a-half times as much as President Obama and family spent in the eight years of the latter's presidency.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-trump-travel-costs/You where saying
Get you facts straight before you bleed to death
statistics say much different, if you have somethi... (
show quote)
How about what the Democraps spend on vacations etc., for example Schumer having drinks with Alexandre Soros in Puerto Rico or was it the Philippines? Either way he went on our dime as did every congress and Senator (see, no preferential treatment).
Realistic wrote:
sadly while you where ignoring the obvious, listening to the talking heads, he has said publicly, to china, to Russia, and to UK, he wanted them to investigate the Bidens, a political rival, on the run up to an election, if he had an issue with the Bidens why was this not done 3 years ago I ask you?
which he also did in the run up to the 2016 election, related to Clinton, using a foreign country to tamper with an election,
it takes no evidence to see the wrong in that. He admitted to defying congress publicly, repeatedly, again requiring no evidence, again wrong, constitutionally, and morally, and only done because of guilt.
why did he immediately have the dictation of his talks with Putin destroyed at the G-20, can only imagine...
sadly while you where ignoring the obvious, listen... (
show quote)
Just a guess, he didn't know about it then? Or another guess at that time Russia was in control of Ukraine, he had to wait until Ukraine was pretty self-sufficient.
CarryOn wrote:
Sadly, you are not being the least bit realistic. There is no proof of any transcript other than the one released, which is the original. There is only your sad, desperate hope that there is more ...
Innocence.
Rather than everybody speculate, go to the nsa (they document EVERYTHING) and see for yourself.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.