One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Question, Why should a president who has been impeached, be allowed to run for the presidency again?
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Feb 3, 2020 08:46:13   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Radiance3 wrote:
=============
https://youtu.be/2E1mOkNohl8

Learn, listen and educate yourself. This will open you eyes about the truth.


Doubt it. Barracuda’s unteachable.

Reply
Feb 3, 2020 08:51:19   #
Radiance3
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
I'm dumb, lol, yeah sweety, he's been impeached, though the crooked senate will acquit him, due to the fact they simply are incapable of doing the right thing, that is who they are now, we all understand that.

They articles of impeachment were perfectly valid because your handlers just make shite up, you shouldn't just follow them like possessed sheep.

Ah yes, they were fake, don't you guys get tired of saying everything is fake when in reality it is just another truth you refuse to believe. They never got Benedict Arnold either. You wanna tell me how innocent he was.

Trump will go down in history as the most corrupt president ever, this will all come out after his presidency, you'll see. Just look at all the fraudulent charges he's already been found guilty of. That is exactly what he is a FRAUD.

Your mind his corroded with Trumpism, it's not jealousy, its disgust.
I'm dumb, lol, yeah sweety, he's been impeached, t... (show quote)

=============
You are so dumb and you've proven it yourself.

Reply
Feb 3, 2020 08:57:11   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Kevyn wrote:
Here is the question to ask, and when you do keep the following in mind. In the 2016 election there were a total of 136,669,237 votes cast. Secretary Clinton received 65,853,516 of those votes or 48%, the Cheeto faced Shitgibbon received, with Moscow’s assistance, 62,948,825 or 46% of the total, however the electoral college put him in office. This means that not only did he lose the popular vote he only received votes from 21% of the 327 million Americans. So the question to ask is should 21% of the people in a democratic republic be allowed to place a treasonous criminal in the presidency? Because that is exactly what happened and the Senate republicans closed the door on the only way to rectify the situation.
Here is the question to ask, and when you do keep ... (show quote)


Um...
Doesn't that mean that Hillary only got votes from 22% of the population?

Reply
 
 
Feb 3, 2020 08:58:24   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Laws should be changed, it should be on the table, it just may be a loophole, but why should an impeached president be allowed to run again? To be impeached the character of the person has been proven to be skeptical of anything coming close to a person of integrity, and unlike what the new right believes, integrity should be a part of the stature of the person running for the leadership of our country.


Bill Clinton did it.

Reply
Feb 3, 2020 09:22:57   #
Kevyn
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Um...
Doesn't that mean that Hillary only got votes from 22% of the population?


Yes, however she is not a criminal and traitor and won the popular vote. That aside if she behaved in the self serving way trump has she would have been removed as Secretary of State.

Reply
Feb 3, 2020 09:32:45   #
American Vet
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Ah, guilt unless proven innocent. How little you leftists understand our country.



Reply
Feb 3, 2020 09:33:24   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Kevyn wrote:
Yes, however she is not a criminal and traitor and won the popular vote. That aside if she behaved in the self serving way trump has she would have been removed as Secretary of State.


Just pointing out the flaw in your argument...

Too bad the founders didn't put anything in the Constitution to prevent people for voting for who they wanted to vote for...

Reply
 
 
Feb 3, 2020 09:34:59   #
American Vet
 
Kevyn wrote:
Yes, however she is not a criminal and traitor and won the popular vote. That aside if she behaved in the self serving way trump has she would have been removed as Secretary of State.


Her being a criminal is still under investigation.

Still crying about 'winning the popular vote'? Too bad she (and you) aren't smart enough to figure out that is not how to win the Presidential election. But feel free to produce more excuses.

Reply
Feb 3, 2020 09:51:51   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Kevyn wrote:
Yes, however she is not a criminal and traitor and won the popular vote. That aside if she behaved in the self serving way trump has she would have been removed as Secretary of State.


Damn. You guys really are losers. Your smarter. Your candidates are much better, get more votes and should be sainted or knighted. Yet you still lose. That’s the definition of a born loser. Live with it. You can’t change genetics.

Reply
Feb 3, 2020 10:10:33   #
Radiance3
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
I'm dumb, lol, yeah sweety, he's been impeached, though the crooked senate will acquit him, due to the fact they simply are incapable of doing the right thing, that is who they are now, we all understand that.

They articles of impeachment were perfectly valid because your handlers just make shite up, you shouldn't just follow them like possessed sheep.

Ah yes, they were fake, don't you guys get tired of saying everything is fake when in reality it is just another truth you refuse to believe. They never got Benedict Arnold either. You wanna tell me how innocent he was.

Trump will go down in history as the most corrupt president ever, this will all come out after his presidency, you'll see. Just look at all the fraudulent charges he's already been found guilty of. That is exactly what he is a FRAUD.

Your mind his corroded with Trumpism, it's not jealousy, its disgust.
I'm dumb, lol, yeah sweety, he's been impeached, t... (show quote)

=============
You've proven it.

Reply
Feb 3, 2020 10:15:50   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Correction. You guys will get to say the most corrupt two term president.
Barracuda2020 wrote:
I'm dumb, lol, yeah sweety, he's been impeached, though the crooked senate will acquit him, due to the fact they simply are incapable of doing the right thing, that is who they are now, we all understand that.

They articles of impeachment were perfectly valid because your handlers just make shite up, you shouldn't just follow them like possessed sheep.

Ah yes, they were fake, don't you guys get tired of saying everything is fake when in reality it is just another truth you refuse to believe. They never got Benedict Arnold either. You wanna tell me how innocent he was.

Trump will go down in history as the most corrupt president ever, this will all come out after his presidency, you'll see. Just look at all the fraudulent charges he's already been found guilty of. That is exactly what he is a FRAUD.

Your mind his corroded with Trumpism, it's not jealousy, its disgust.
I'm dumb, lol, yeah sweety, he's been impeached, t... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Feb 3, 2020 10:57:32   #
Sonny Magoo Loc: Where pot pie is boiled in a kettle
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Laws should be changed, it should be on the table, it just may be a loophole, but why should an impeached president be allowed to run again? To be impeached the character of the person has been proven to be skeptical of anything coming close to a person of integrity, and unlike what the new right believes, integrity should be a part of the stature of the person running for the leadership of our country.


Looks like "drain the swamp " should include you too, seeing how the impeachment is about me, and the rest of America that loves our president.

Reply
Feb 3, 2020 13:14:05   #
Trumpnotthestormiestpres Loc: L.A.
 
Because impeachment articles were illegally obtained by a hell bent partisan House official conspiring with a whistleblower. Because there was no quid pro quo base crime. Because so slabs not getting his way does not an impeachment make.

Because that's the law of this country

Reply
Feb 3, 2020 13:15:25   #
Trumpnotthestormiestpres Loc: L.A.
 
Because impeachment articles were illegally obtained by a hell bent partisan House official conspiring with a whistleblower. Because there was no quid pro quo base crime. Because so slabs not getting his way does not an impeachment make.

Because that's the law of this country

Reply
Feb 3, 2020 13:23:37   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
Kevyn wrote:
Here is the question to ask, and when you do keep the following in mind. In the 2016 election there were a total of 136,669,237 votes cast. Secretary Clinton received 65,853,516 of those votes or 48%, the Cheeto faced Shitgibbon received, with Moscow’s assistance, 62,948,825 or 46% of the total, however the electoral college put him in office. This means that not only did he lose the popular vote he only received votes from 21% of the 327 million Americans. So the question to ask is should 21% of the people in a democratic republic be allowed to place a treasonous criminal in the presidency? Because that is exactly what happened and the Senate republicans closed the door on the only way to rectify the situation.
Here is the question to ask, and when you do keep ... (show quote)


Seems By Your Own Tabulation
Hillary Didn't Get A Majority Of Votes Either
And All Those Extra Votes She Did Get
Were Only From California
I've Posted The Certified California Results For You At Least Thrice Already
And You Just Ignore It, Bottom Pg 3
https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/sov/2016-general/ssov/pres-summary-by-county.pdf

Also
How Do You Want To Explain The Same Rules Being Used By The DNC By Itself ??



Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.