Question, Why should a president who has been impeached, be allowed to run for the presidency again? Laws should be changed, it should be on the table, it just may be a loophole, but...

Cuda2020

Laws should be changed, it should be on the table, it just may be a loophole, but why should an impeached president be allowed to run again? To be impeached the character of the person has been proven to be skeptical of anything coming close to a person of integrity, and unlike what the new right believes, integrity should be a part of the stature of the person running for the leadership of our country.

Radiance3

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Laws should be changed, it should be on the table, it just may be a loophole, but why should an impeached president be allowed to run again? To be impeached the character of the person has been proven to be skeptical of anything coming close to a person of integrity, and unlike what the new right believes, integrity should be a part of the stature of the person running for the leadership of our country.

==============
Are you soo..dumb to understand? The president was not impeached. The Articles of Impeachment were fraudulent, unconstitutional, unproven, because they did not exist. The lying and fraudulent Adam Schitt must be held accountable.

And aside from the fact that the fabricated Articles were fake, they all did not meet the impeachable offense. None was proven for 3.5 years of investigations, wasted taxpayers' money of more than $100 million.

The president will be acquitted. He is the best president since history, and the fraudulent and corrupt radical democrats are soo... jealous that they attempted removing him by all means.

Because the truth will set us free..God bless American, and president Trump.

Rose42

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Laws should be changed, it should be on the table, it just may be a loophole, but why should an impeached president be allowed to run again? To be impeached the character of the person has been proven to be skeptical of anything coming close to a person of integrity, and unlike what the new right believes, integrity should be a part of the stature of the person running for the leadership of our country.

Let the voters decide. The process was followed and we can’t change laws just because we don’t like the results.

The left put up Clinton last time. She has no integrity. How do we stop these kind of people from becoming candidates in the first place?

karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Laws should be changed, it should be on the table, it just may be a loophole, but why should an impeached president be allowed to run again?

Because The President Hasn't Been Convicted Of Anything Impeachable
Because The Opposition Didn't Present Any Impeachable Offences

You Did Notice The Only Bi-Partisan Effort In The House
Was The 'No' Vote To Impeach

Quote:

integrity should be a part of the stature of the person running for the leadership of our country.

Graft, Corruption, Tax Cheats....
That Would Exclude Any Democrat From The Presidency For Ever

Let's Solve The Problem At It's Core:
How About You Demonstrate Some Ability To Think Through Simple Logic
Along With Picture ID, In Order To Vote ??
Would That Suppress The Democrat Vote Even More ??

Cuda2020

Radiance3 wrote:

============== br i Are you soo..dumb to understa... (show quote)

I'm dumb, lol, yeah sweety, he's been impeached, though the crooked senate will acquit him, due to the fact they simply are incapable of doing the right thing, that is who they are now, we all understand that.

They articles of impeachment were perfectly valid because your handlers just make shite up, you shouldn't just follow them like possessed sheep.

Ah yes, they were fake, don't you guys get tired of saying everything is fake when in reality it is just another truth you refuse to believe. They never got Benedict Arnold either. You wanna tell me how innocent he was.

Trump will go down in history as the most corrupt president ever, this will all come out after his presidency, you'll see. Just look at all the fraudulent charges he's already been found guilty of. That is exactly what he is a FRAUD.

Your mind his corroded with Trumpism, it's not jealousy, its disgust.

karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!

Speaking Of Crooked

Again
The Only Bi-Partisan Effort In The House
Was The 'No' Vote To Impeach

Cuda2020

karpenter wrote:

Speaking Of Crooked

Again
The Only Bi-Partisan Effort In The House
Was The 'No' Vote To Impeach

No the vote to impeach from the House, are you insane or just suffering from dementia?

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Laws should be changed, it should be on the table, it just may be a loophole, but why should an impeached president be allowed to run again? To be impeached the character of the person has been proven to be skeptical of anything coming close to a person of integrity, and unlike what the new right believes, integrity should be a part of the stature of the person running for the leadership of our country.

Ah, guilt unless proven innocent. How little you leftists understand our country.

karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!

Barracuda2020 wrote:

No the vote to impeach from the House, are you insane or just suffering from dementia?

Ding-Dong, Anyone Home ??
Not All Democrats Voted To Impeach
That Means Some Democrats Voted 'NO' Along With ALL Republicans
That Means The 'No' To Impeach Vote Was Bi-Partisan
Unlike The 'Yes' Vote That Was Partisan Democrat Votes ONLY

Try To Think
...But Don't Give Yourself A Head-Ache

karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!

Who voted "No"

Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.), who has represented Minnesota's 7th district since 1991. His district pivoted to support Trump after voting in Obama for two terms.
Rep. Jeff Van Drew (D-N.J.), a freshman Democrat in New Jersey's 2nd district who is expected to go Republican. He has voted against Trump on nearly all issues except impeachment. His district swung to support Trump in 2016 after voting in Obama for two terms.
Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine), a freshman, followed through on his promise to vote yes for the impeachment article accusing Trump of abusing his power — but not the second, which alleges that Trump obstructed Congress.

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), the only House Democrat to remain publicly undecided on impeachment at the 11th hour, voted "present" for both articles. She was elected to Hawaii's 2nd district in 2013, which remained blue in 2016 as a historically Democratic state.
Gabbard characterized her vote as "standing in the center," saying in a statement that she "could not in good conscience vote against impeachment because I believe President Trump is guilty of wrongdoing" — but that a vote for this impeachment would be part of a "partisan process."

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Laws should be changed, it should be on the table, it just may be a loophole, but why should an impeached president be allowed to run again? To be impeached the character of the person has been proven to be skeptical of anything coming close to a person of integrity, and unlike what the new right believes, integrity should be a part of the stature of the person running for the leadership of our country.

Ask the founding fathers...

But seriously...

In the future, any house held by the opposing party could impeach the president and keep him from running for a second term...

Totally partisan...

But I doubt that bothers you...

Unless your upset about the partisan vote in the Senate...

Which of course may be bipartisan...

Still have that partisan vote in the House...

But I don't recall you moaning about that...

Seems like your just a sore loser...

Weeping because he can't win even when his side cheats...

There's a word for spoiled brats like that...

MAGA... KAG... Trump 2020...

karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!

Barracuda Or Flat Fish

Kevyn

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Laws should be changed, it should be on the table, it just may be a loophole, but why should an impeached president be allowed to run again? To be impeached the character of the person has been proven to be skeptical of anything coming close to a person of integrity, and unlike what the new right believes, integrity should be a part of the stature of the person running for the leadership of our country.

Here is the question to ask, and when you do keep the following in mind. In the 2016 election there were a total of 136,669,237 votes cast. Secretary Clinton received 65,853,516 of those votes or 48%, the Cheeto faced Shitgibbon received, with Moscow’s assistance, 62,948,825 or 46% of the total, however the electoral college put him in office. This means that not only did he lose the popular vote he only received votes from 21% of the 327 million Americans. So the question to ask is should 21% of the people in a democratic republic be allowed to place a treasonous criminal in the presidency? Because that is exactly what happened and the Senate republicans closed the door on the only way to rectify the situation.

Radiance3

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Laws should be changed, it should be on the table, it just may be a loophole, but why should an impeached president be allowed to run again? To be impeached the character of the person has been proven to be skeptical of anything coming close to a person of integrity, and unlike what the new right believes, integrity should be a part of the stature of the person running for the leadership of our country.

=============
Mark Levine is a brilliant constitutional legal council.
https://youtu.be/2E1mOkNohl8

Learn, listen, and educate yourself. This will open you eyes about the the constitution and the truth.

Adam Schitthead must be prosecuted by violating the constitution, and for abuse of power against the president of the United States.

Impeachment should have been dismissed without any merits. But it did not fly anyway. And the president will be acquitted at the Senate. Bravo Mr. President. May God bless you always.

Any question radical DEMS?

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

In your world indictment by the grand jury would equal guilty. Damn you really are dumb.

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Laws should be changed, it should be on the table, it just may be a loophole, but why should an impeached president be allowed to run again? To be impeached the character of the person has been proven to be skeptical of anything coming close to a person of integrity, and unlike what the new right believes, integrity should be a part of the stature of the person running for the leadership of our country.