Why are Senate Republicans blowing their one opportunity?
Jan 31, 2020 11:44:46 #
Chamuco wrote:
ADDITIONALLY.., Why didn't the House Democrats cal... (show quote)
Very simple, the impeachment was all about trump and trump only.. If you or anyone thinks an investigation of the Bidens should be done.. go for it..
follow the rules and do it..
An impeachment does not branch out and cover extraneous subjects.. it is directed as the constatution demands and the only includes the man in the oval office in this case..
No matter how much you wish, the republicans are not about to allow anymore information about their orange lord than is now on record..
None of those investigation you all dream about will happen.. no law infraction.. only the law busted by the orange criminal and that is what it is all about.
this PM or tomorrow AM the senate will dismiss the charges on the con man and we will go on from there..
This outcome was publicly announced weeks ago by McConnell and we all know it..
November will bring the chicken home to roost and we will see if the minority can rule one more time..
I would not bet your shirt or even a cent on that coming through..
The truth about trumps only "accomplishment"
Jan 31, 2020 11:49:30 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
The Cover Up would be UNCOVERED with eyewitness testimony.
Yet they squeal about an unfair trial when the opportunity exists to expose the unfairness they think is there.
Must be a creepy feeling defending that freak. They've sold their souls.
Yet they squeal about an unfair trial when the opportunity exists to expose the unfairness they think is there.
Must be a creepy feeling defending that freak. They've sold their souls.
Can't be a cover up without a crime dummy. Law 101: To a have a crime you need a victim. Name the victim. What was the supposed quid pro quo? (Even though that is not even a charge). Was an investigation into the Biden's started by the Ukraine? No. Did the Ukraine receive their aid before the deadline. Yes. Does the President have an obligation per the treaty with the Ukraine to ask about potential corruption (No matter who's involved)? Yes. Not defending Trump fool. Defending the Rule of Law. something you lefties care nothing about.
You must be a creep. Lying, twisting and slandering the Law and the president.
Jan 31, 2020 11:52:23 #
permafrost wrote:
Very simple, the impeachment was all about trump a... (show quote)
If you are an honest person you know/understand your clan would do the same thing and they did with the black guy and AG.
Jan 31, 2020 12:01:49 #
JFlorio wrote:
Can't be a cover up without a crime dummy. Law 101... (show quote)
You've been getting your talking points from Fox News apparently.
Goodbye American experiment, hello monarchy.
Jan 31, 2020 12:12:22 #
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
You've been getting your talking points from Fox News apparently.
Goodbye American experiment, hello monarchy.
Goodbye American experiment, hello monarchy.
: Jan 31, 2020 12:19:07 #
jimpack123
Loc: wisconsin
MR Mister wrote:
Your Commies in the House blow it, big rush to turn out two articles of nothing. Neither of which are
showing any laws broken. Now the little light has come on and you want the Senate to fix your screw up. lol
It's all over but for the shouting and crying of your clan.
Seems you are too dumb to come in out of the rain.
showing any laws broken. Now the little light has come on and you want the Senate to fix your screw up. lol
It's all over but for the shouting and crying of your clan.
Seems you are too dumb to come in out of the rain.
Lets just wait till Nov. and let the American voters decide. both sides have given very good cases. Bolton's book will come out before November and the Voters will decide very simple right.
Jan 31, 2020 12:23:28 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
jimpack123 wrote:
Lets just wait till Nov. and let the American voters decide. both sides have given very good cases. Bolton's book will come out before November and the Voters will decide very simple right.
Exactly how the Founders intended.
Jan 31, 2020 12:52:56 #
JFlorio wrote:
Can't be a cover up without a crime dummy. Law 101... (show quote)
If it were true that the president was holding up military aid and a White House invitation out of concerns over corruption, it’s unclear why this wasn’t relayed to any of the involved diplomats, who testified they had no idea why the aid was suspended [at least not until far later]. It’s also quite the coincidence that the conspiracy-theory-based corruption investigations the president wanted Ukraine to launch just so happened to benefit him politically.
There was no quid pro quo
Several witnesses testified that a quid pro quo was in place between the Trump administration and Ukraine. One such witness was Trump donor-turned-E.U. ambassador Gordon Sondland, who was in direct contact with Trump explained to the Intelligence Committee in no uncertain terms that a tit-for-tat agreement was in place. “I know that members of this committee have frequently framed these complicated issues in the form of a simple question: ‘Was there a quid pro quo?’” Sondland testified last month. “As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes.”
Jan 31, 2020 13:19:19 #
permafrost wrote:
About Trump and Trump only, huh? I suppose you really believe that, don't you? This impeachment debacle is the latest attack by something much deeper and far more insidious than just the removal of a president from office. Donald Trump just happened to get in the way of it.Very simple, the impeachment was all about trump a... (show quote)
Jan 31, 2020 13:25:56 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
About Trump and Trump only, huh? I suppose you really believe that, don't you? This impeachment debacle is the result of something much deeper and far more insidious than just the removal of a president from office. Donald Trump just happened to get in the way of it.
This is your brain on conspiracy theory...
Kids, don't do conspiracy theories. Not good for you and you lose your moral compass.
Jan 31, 2020 13:31:48 #
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
No, it isn't a conspiracy theory, useless, I never expected any leftist lemming to figure out what I alluded to. No surprise you don't get it.This is your brain on conspiracy theory...
Kids, don't do conspiracy theories. Not good for you and you lose your moral compass.
Kids, don't do conspiracy theories. Not good for you and you lose your moral compass.
Check out topic: China & Russia are now like two Peas in a Pod.👍
Jan 31, 2020 13:41:49 #
Crayons
Loc: St Jo, Texas
The Uniparty/duopoly=dino's n' rino's have both been feeding from the same trough,
Why do ya think the compromised capital critters hate Rand Paul and Steve Scalise
Why do ya think the compromised capital critters hate Rand Paul and Steve Scalise
Jan 31, 2020 16:00:54 #
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
The Cover Up would be UNCOVERED with eyewitness testimony.
Yet they squeal about an unfair trial when the opportunity exists to expose the unfairness they think is there.
Must be a creepy feeling defending that freak. They've sold their souls.
Yet they squeal about an unfair trial when the opportunity exists to expose the unfairness they think is there.
Must be a creepy feeling defending that freak. They've sold their souls.
No need since that "unfairness" has already been "exposed".., while those few Dems who even believe in "souls" sold them long, long ago.
Jan 31, 2020 17:45:40 #
Chamuco wrote:
No need since that "unfairness" has already been "exposed".., while those few Dems who even believe in "souls" sold them long, long ago.
And the Republicans?
Jan 31, 2020 17:54:27 #
jimpack123
Loc: wisconsin
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
And the Republicans?
they never had one as they are following the ANTICHRIST lol
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.