permafrost wrote:
Tommy, do you know that George has no political power in our country? He is just one more person.. He can not be a tyrant, that requires those who slither into the oval office via the vote of our minority.. and crazy, self destructing right wing orange zealots..
If you wish, you can repost any pertinent comment on this thread then any who are curious will not have to search the tread you post for anything at all.
Have you never heard the phrase, "money talks and (bovine scat) walks"?
Political power can and has been bought, and that is where and how Soros wields his power, and bankrolls others to do his bidding, as do international bankers. It is the epitome of hypocrisy and an oxymoron, to call the labors of such ilk as "fighting for liberty".
Here's my post, thanks for the invitation to share it here:
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-174356-1.html#3130786The "left" is not "right" in so many ways...
How many times have we heard leftists say nobody is going to take away your guns?
https://www.westernjournal.com/dan-crenshaw-ted-cruz-watch-mock-liberals-stupid-gun-lies/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=CTBreaking&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content=conservative-tribuneThe left’s war on America is fundamentally a war of thought control against individual human liberty.
This article, unfortunately, begins with the premise that our right to bear arms is “a fundamental Constitutional right”. For me at least, that isn’t quite accurate enough. Rather, the “right” to bear arms is a fundamental “human right”, higher than mere government-granted privileges, just like free speech and freedom of religion, for examples, that the Constitution “recognizes” and “protects” but does not technically “grant”.
Thus, make no mistake, the left’s war on the Constitutionally recognized and protected “rights” is a war on basic “human rights”.
So, in reality,
being a “leftist” means supporting what you have “left” when all your individual “human rights” have been sacrificed to the tyranny of the “authoritarian collective”. Thus a more descriptive term for their ideology is
"what-is-LEFT-ist" after your rights are taken away. This is a win-lose proposition, where human rights are sacrificed and lost. The winners are only the politicians in “control” of doling out the privileges, which they equate to “rights” they “give” to you (or take away from you), as their subordinates.
It wasn’t godless atheists who gave this country our freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to bear arms, government of, by and for the people: it was, for the most part, highly religious persons who did so. They did not create this country so as to have "left behind” human rights, convictions or responsibilities; they created this country to highlight our basic human rights, to honor them, and protect them: because they are our “rights”, not merely our “benefits” somehow graciously bestowed upon us by tyrannical leaders, as if we were their serfs or slaves. Not all tyrants are individuals; in that, once again, the left is not right.
This is why I identify politically as “a right-wing conservative”; it is because I identify with acknowledging and protecting, and yes, even and particularly “conserving”, basic human “rights.” It is this liberty which recognizes my God-given right and responsibility not only to live, but also to speak from my conscience regardless of whether my ideology aligns with the “collective authority” of the state. Communism, which is directly and purposefully responsible for the deaths of 100’s of millions, is the ultimate expression of the
"what’s-LEFT-ist” ideology. What kind of people, other than tyrants, would wish to impose such an ideology on US?
Thus the
"what’s-LEFT-ist” ideology is not something I’ll ever go along with.
-Tommy Raddatz