One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
If McConnell opts for a witness free kangaroo court.
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Jan 20, 2020 07:13:27   #
Radiance3
 
Lonewolf wrote:
If trumps call was perfect why not let the other people in on the call testfi ,they could collaborate trump! Quick and easy way to end it right!

================
Testify like the drunk Parnas who is indicted for crimes.
Zero credibility.

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 07:34:30   #
Radiance3
 
permafrost wrote:
Not true, the big question is whether trump can be trusted. The short answer is no. trump lacks credibility and has plenty of incentive to bend the truth..


================
The best democrat witness will be Adam Schitt under oath. He must release the name and identity of the Whistle blower to prove that ever exist. And if he/she exist, demand to show up as witness.

I believe Schitt made that up. He could not prove, denied the identity. In the Court of Law, evidential facts must be presented. . Schitt fabricated that and all the lies came out from his mouth.

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 08:24:20   #
m.kirmaier
 
I suspect that Mitch will allow the Dems just as many witnesses as Polosi allowed the Republicans to put up on the stand. ZERO! What goes around is sure to come back and bite the Dems in the crotch.

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2020 11:47:32   #
TrueAmerican
 
Kevyn wrote:
Key House Democrats pressing the Senate to hear from new witnesses in President Trump’s impeachment trial are leaving the door open to another possibility: calling those witnesses themselves if Senate Republicans do not.
House Democrats impeached Trump last month on two charges related to his handling of foreign policy in Ukraine, but their investigations into the issue remain open even as the spotlight turns to the launch of the Senate trial.
Democrats in both chambers are hoping the emergence of new evidence and eyewitness offers to testify will force Senate GOP leaders to consider the unexplored information, including captivating details of Trump’s pressure campaign recently provided by Lev Parnas, a Soviet-born businessman with close ties to Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.
Key House Democrats pressing the Senate to hear fr... (show quote)


Now from our local NIT_WIT go ahead kevy-boi spew your crap !!!!!!

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 12:52:26   #
Noraa Loc: Kansas
 
m.kirmaier wrote:
I suspect that Mitch will allow the Dems just as many witnesses as Polosi allowed the Republicans to put up on the stand. ZERO! What goes around is sure to come back and bite the Dems in the crotch.


Welcome to OPP!

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 13:02:41   #
Radiance3
 
permafrost wrote:
Not true, the big question is whether trump can be trusted. The short answer is no. trump lacks credibility and has plenty of incentive to bend the truth..

===============
It has been proven for three years that he is trustworthy. Not only that, he is loyal and faithful to all of us. His hard works and achievements are for all of us. He could have retired in luxury and peace. But he bravely faces his most stressful job to make America great again.

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 13:56:15   #
boulderjack
 
hey thanks nice write, watts your read on the final outcome ?! like the last time we see how even a seamon stain can get you impeached!!! or even an admin. error typo mis spell or badd signature ! Badd phone call (recorded) no less plus wittnessed
i thought only rookies were stupid ! oh well let the wheels fall where they will ! if we remove him from office we must furnish the U-Haul Truck !!! see ya on the other side of mike pence indictment then the presidentcy goes to Nancy mega boob pelosi

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2020 14:07:32   #
Noraa Loc: Kansas
 
boulderjack wrote:
hey thanks nice write, watts your read on the final outcome ?! like the last time we see how even a seamon stain can get you impeached!!! or even an admin. error typo mis spell or badd signature ! Badd phone call (recorded) no less plus wittnessed
i thought only rookies were stupid ! oh well let the wheels fall where they will ! if we remove him from office we must furnish the U-Haul Truck !!! see ya on the other side of mike pence indictment then the presidentcy goes to Nancy mega boob pelosi
hey thanks nice write, watts your read on the f... (show quote)


Don't forget to hit the quote reply when responding to a post so we know who you are talking to.

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 14:12:09   #
boulderjack
 
thanks for your help with the new update

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 14:16:16   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
m.kirmaier wrote:
It's time to put up the following just to name a few: Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Hillary Clinton, Schiff, Nadler, the president of Ukraine, Barry Obamer, and whoever negotiated that wonderful treaty with Iran. The Ukrainian president will vouch for Don on the phone call. The rest of them should be made to account for their individual treasonous actions.


And what do you think that any those people you list would know about trump to add to the impeachment process??

While the impeachment has been done, removal from office is not happening.. the word long ago was mitch would never do anything the white house did not approve of..

What the hell would Biden know about trump actions?? why would you want them in the impeachment process, they would know nothing.. it is the witnesses which were blocked by trump that would perhaps have something to contribute.. they should be brought in.



Reply
Jan 20, 2020 14:22:36   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Radiance3 wrote:
================
The best democrat witness will be Adam Schitt under oath. He must release the name and identity of the Whistle blower to prove that ever exist. And if he/she exist, demand to show up as witness.

I believe Schitt made that up. He could not prove, denied the identity. In the Court of Law, evidential facts must be presented. . Schitt fabricated that and all the lies came out from his mouth.


Impeachment is conducted under rules that differ from the local court room..

We have a law that is designed to protect whistle blowers. and only the orange thug wants to endanger the process by exposing the person to retaliation..

What the heck do you imagine Adam would have to say the trump would want to hear??

You and so many seem to think this is an open investigation of the world and somehow anyone you do not like could be condemned if only you could get them in court..

this Impeachment/removal is only about trump.. none of those who you wish were evil are in anyway being investigated and nothing has been shown that that should happen, which would have to be a new and differing investigation.



Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2020 14:29:18   #
woodguru
 
Radiance3 wrote:
==================
This is so funny. Parnes has been always drunk. Serious credibility problems, and currently a number of pending court cases on his crimes.

CNN's Jake Tapper knocks Dems for rushing to trust Lev Parnas: He has a 'serious credibility problem.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/01/16/ukrainian_foreign_minister_i_dont_trust_any_word_from_lev_parnas.html

https://theresurgent.com/2020/01/17/can-lev-parnas-be-trusted/

The big question is whether Parnas can be trusted. The short answer is no. Parnas lacks credibility and has plenty of incentive to bend the truth.
================== br This is so funny. Parnes has... (show quote)

And what is so funny is that the right wants to believe that someone who does have questionable ethics, who was on the inside with a president who has questionable ethics, who has surrounded himself with dodgy characters, in fact eliminating everyone with ethics, can't blow his boss out of the water with facts surrounding what he knows and did.

The right would like to believe that a liar working for a liar can't tell the truth when he wants and has his reasons for taking trump down. The automatic response that this guy is lying is counter acted by the fact that his statements are not taken at face value at all, they are cross referenced with other facts and corroboration or they are disregarded as not verified.

Parnas had the most comprehensive view on what was going on of perhaps anyone, and he talked to Giuliani as a friend and confidant.

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 14:30:50   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
It has been proven for three years that he is trustworthy. Not only that, he is loyal and faithful to all of us. His hard works and achievements are for all of us. He could have retired in luxury and peace. But he bravely faces his most stressful job to make America great again.



The only thing you can trust trump to do is lie..

He lies when he has no need.. no one should ever trust him for anything.. if he says it is raining, check it yourself..

He is loyal only to himself and his pocket book.. run now by Putin the worlds leading thug and you are so silly to think he is somehow reputable, not at all true..

He is a blemish on the butt of America.. that is at his very best..

Gosh, what fine words... wonderful words, some of the best words..

You should be his publicist.. he would love hearing all your fine comments about him, he normaly only hears himself.. he would love you biggly..



Reply
Jan 20, 2020 15:03:16   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
If all those on the above list could offer nothing of substance to the impeachment, why is the left worried about them being called? LOL!

Because Trump wants the Biden corruption in Ukraine revealed. Because Schiff might have written the whistle blower complaint. Because Vindman probably is the whistle blower who claimed Trump made a demand of the Ukraine president. Because Obama and Clinton were involved in the Ukraine Biden corruption. Etc, etc.

If it's all not true, then like Trump, there should be nothing to hide. Hypocrites!!!!!!!

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 15:12:12   #
Noraa Loc: Kansas
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
If all those on the above list could offer nothing of substance to the impeachment, why is the left worried about them being called? LOL!

Because Trump wants the Biden corruption in Ukraine revealed. Because Schiff might have written the whistle blower complaint. Because Vindman probably is the whistle blower who claimed Trump made a demand of the Ukraine president. Because Obama and Clinton were involved in the Ukraine Biden corruption. Etc, etc.

If it's all not true, then like Trump, there should be nothing to hide. Hypocrites!!!!!!!
If all those on the above list could offer nothing... (show quote)



Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.