One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
How is it killing Soleimani is different from killing Osama bin Laden???
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Jan 6, 2020 17:20:40   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Kevyn wrote:
The operation that killed Bin Laden differs on several accounts. First and foremost the intent of the mission was to first attempt to capture him, he was killed only after resisting capture. Last years killing by special forces of bu Bakr al-Baghdadi in Syria is closer to the events leading to Bin Laden’s demise. Neither man was a government official and both were wanted criminals. Suleimani was a high ranking Iranian official and not a fugitive from justice, the attack also killed an Iraqi official and was done in defiance of the Iraqi government. The differences are night and day.
The operation that killed Bin Laden differs on sev... (show quote)
What would you do if there were no government officials whose asses you could kiss?

Reply
Jan 6, 2020 17:23:29   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
Could be that as usual you have no idea what you are talking about.




NAILED IT!!

Reply
Jan 6, 2020 17:27:15   #
Kevyn
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
What would you do if there were no government officials whose asses you could kiss?

It seems like it is you on bent knee puckered up behind the Orange Anus, defending his lies, crimes and buffoonery. And he is the grandest of Poobas in your book. Personally I wouldn’t piss on the man if he was on fire, and I had just finished a six pack of Iron City beer.



Reply
 
 
Jan 6, 2020 17:29:41   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Kevyn wrote:
It seems like it is you on bent knee puckered up behind the Orange Anus, defending his lies, crimes and buffoonery. And he is the grandest of Poobas in your book. Personally I wouldn’t piss on the man if he was on fire, and I had just finished a six pack of Iron City beer.



Reply
Jan 6, 2020 17:31:43   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
Kevyn wrote:
It seems like it is you on bent knee puckered up behind the Orange Anus, defending his lies, crimes and buffoonery. And he is the grandest of Poobas in your book. Personally I wouldn’t piss on the man if he was on fire, and I had just finished a six pack of Iron City beer.




Yet you want his piss tapes.........hypocrite!

Reply
Jan 6, 2020 17:46:38   #
Dwight Logan
 
proud republican wrote:
Did obama asked Congress permission to go after him?? I don't remember Democrats accusing obama of committing war crimes!! I remember everyone cheering for the killing of that terrorist!! So please tell me how is it different from what President Trump did last Thursday by getting rid of one of the monsters!!! We should be applauding President Trump,not calling him names!!!!


True Americans are behind his efforts to make America great again. It is the poor losers over the election that fight everything that he does. If Hillary had won the whole country would have lost.

Reply
Jan 6, 2020 18:33:29   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Dwight Logan wrote:
True Americans are behind his efforts to make America great again. It is the poor losers over the election that fight everything that he does. If Hillary had won the whole country would have lost.


I agree!!!!

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2020 05:24:12   #
Tug484
 
proud republican wrote:
Did obama asked Congress permission to go after him?? I don't remember Democrats accusing obama of committing war crimes!! I remember everyone cheering for the killing of that terrorist!! So please tell me how is it different from what President Trump did last Thursday by getting rid of one of the monsters!!! We should be applauding President Trump,not calling him names!!!!



Me either .

Reply
Jan 7, 2020 05:25:45   #
Tug484
 
Seth wrote:
The Dems have a double standard: Obama could do as he pleased, Trump needs their permission to use the restroom.


That's what's irritating about them.
They agreed to everything that mozzie did.

Reply
Jan 7, 2020 06:14:00   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
Kevyn wrote:
It seems like it is you on bent knee puckered up behind the Orange Anus, defending his lies, crimes and buffoonery. And he is the grandest of Poobas in your book. Personally I wouldn’t piss on the man if he was on fire, and I had just finished a six pack of Iron City beer.




Iron city beer.......I bet that piss you drink makes one have to piss more.

Pennsylvania beer.....if it only didn't taste like crap.

explains a lot.

Reply
Jan 7, 2020 06:14:30   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
Could be that as usual you have no idea what you are talking about.


He never does, just in his little warped mind!

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2020 06:20:01   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
The difference is Congress didn't hate barry. Plus barry didn't do it, he kissed their ass a sniper did.


Absolutely correct, Oblamo could do no wrong in with the dem's eyes, and most republicans!

Reply
Jan 7, 2020 06:29:19   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
The difference is Soliemani was a bigger fish than al-Baghdadi and Osama bin Laden combined. Neither ISIS nor Al Qaeda are national military forces, they are not state sponsored terrorist organizations. OTH, Soliemani, Iran's golden boy, commanded the Iranian Quds force, designated a terrorist group in 2007.

The CIA described Soliemani as the single most powerful operative in the Middle East today. Soliemani was Iran's number 2 general, but he was the Ayatollah's number one boy. Ali Khamenei loved this guy, looked upon him as a son, even groomed him to become Iran's president when he took off the uniform. Essentially, Soliemani was Iran's number two leader after Khamenei. Guess who was the driving force behind the infamous "nuclear deal"? Yep, dear old general Soliemani, he definitely wanted to get his hands on nuclear weapons. Obama Did More Than Just Look the Other Way at Soleimani; the Iran Deal Gave Him Amnesty

General Qassem Soleimani instructed Iraqi militia leaders, including his top ally in the country, Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, to step up attacks on US targets in the country during a meeting in October at a villa across the Tigris River from the US embassy complex in Baghdad.

The attacks would deploy sophisticated new weapons provided by Iran, including Katyusha rockets and shoulder-fired missiles that could bring down helicopters.

The strategy session took place as mass protests against Iran’s growing influence in Iraq were gaining momentum. Soleimani’s plan to attack US forces was designed to provoke a military response that would redirect that anger toward America.

Soleimani, 62, the leader of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards’ Quds Force, ordered a new militia group formed to carry out rocket attacks on Americans housed at Iraqi military bases. Muhandis’ Kataib Hezbollah force was to direct the operations, because the militia had the capability to use drones to scout targets for rocket attacks. Soleimani’s forces supplied its Iraqi militia allies with a drone Iran had developed that could elude radar systems last fall.

By late December, attacks by Iranian-backed groups on bases hosting US forces in Iraq were increasing to include firing more than 30 rockets at an Iraqi military base near Kirkuk that killed a US civilian contractor. US airstrikes followed, which set off two days of violent protests at the US embassy in Baghdad.

On Thursday — the day before the attack that killed Soleimani and Muhandis — US Defense Secretary Mark Esper warned that the United States might have to take preemptive action to protect American lives from expected attacks by Iran-backed militias.


In the space of 3 months, US troops eliminated two mortal enemies of the United States, Israel, and the civilized world in general. This is the work of a Commander-in-Chief with a humongous pair of cojones.
The difference is Soliemani was a bigger fish than... (show quote)


Amen, but these idiotic dem's in Comgress are so determined to remove Trump, they are now using this as another excuse to add impeachment charges against him. They should be applauding him, not condemning him. They all need to be removed from office, along with some of the rino's, like Romney!

Reply
Jan 7, 2020 09:10:53   #
rebob14
 
proud republican wrote:
Did obama asked Congress permission to go after him?? I don't remember Democrats accusing obama of committing war crimes!! I remember everyone cheering for the killing of that terrorist!! So please tell me how is it different from what President Trump did last Thursday by getting rid of one of the monsters!!! We should be applauding President Trump,not calling him names!!!!


It’s not!

Reply
Jan 7, 2020 10:52:43   #
JediKnight
 
proud republican wrote:
Did obama asked Congress permission to go after him?? I don't remember Democrats accusing obama of committing war crimes!! I remember everyone cheering for the killing of that terrorist!! So please tell me how is it different from what President Trump did last Thursday by getting rid of one of the monsters!!! We should be applauding President Trump,not calling him names!!!!


The most obvious difference is that Bin Laden was "known for" attacking the WTC in '93 as well as '01. Bin Laden had made many public videos displaying his intent to utterly destroy America. What concrete evidence did Trump have on Soleimani other than knowing he was an Iranian General?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.