One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
A question regarding self defense shootings
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Jan 5, 2020 11:03:03   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
1ProudAmerican wrote:
...because kevy doesn't like the kid across the street because his (kevy's) mom likes him better than kevy….kevy is trying to find out his options....




Ha! Sounds reasonable to me

Reply
Jan 5, 2020 11:03:40   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
archie bunker wrote:
Kev, Kev, Kev, are you trying to tailor the conversation here?

I mean, you bring the AR-15, 30 round mag, and a dead kid into it, and all.

Sorry, but I can see where you're going with this. It's obvious to me anyway.




Yep, he covered all the talking points.

Reply
Jan 5, 2020 13:06:12   #
woodguru
 
bggamers wrote:
They can be held liable but if they just hit the bad guy no that's one reason most legal gun owners don't engage. Here in ga we have the castle law that protects you from intruders or castle doctrine it is in Alabama/Georgia (home/car/business) you have the right to defend yourself in these 3 areas but the shooting must be while your inside and threatened so I'm really not sure how that scenario would work while in public

Successfully shoot the bad guy and you are a hero, miss and hurt a bystander and you are guilty of a form of manslaughter, not intentional murder in the first degree.

I have carried concealed and done the processing on when it's my place to interfere with an armed robbery, if the person carries out his robbery and it doesn't look like anyone is going to get hurt I'll keep it to myself, if it looks like people could be killed I will intervene. The other factor here is the degree I have competed in pistol speed events, I know what I can do, and the chances of me missing is fairly low. I'm not a hero but I won't stand by and watch people get killed either, there is a line.

Trying to intervene and save people is not a free pass to screw it up and kill innocent people, there are robbery situations where it's best just to cooperate and get the robber on his way without shots being fired. Every situation is obviously different....and there are tow types of people, those who think you do something no matter what, you don't let the bad guy get away, the other weighs whether it's worth unnecessarily endangering innocent people. Hero types can get people killed.

Reply
 
 
Jan 5, 2020 13:07:45   #
woodguru
 
Hug wrote:
Lot of difference between Zimmerman and a guy bashing a mail box.

Zimmerman was worse...

Reply
Jan 5, 2020 13:08:54   #
Hug
 
woodguru wrote:
Successfully shoot the bad guy and you are a hero, miss and hurt a bystander and you are guilty of a form of manslaughter, not intentional murder in the first degree.

I have carried concealed and done the processing on when it's my place to interfere with an armed robbery, if the person carries out his robbery and it doesn't look like anyone is going to get hurt I'll keep it to myself, if it looks like people could be killed I will intervene. The other factor here is the degree I have competed in pistol speed events, I know what I can do, and the chances of me missing is fairly low. I'm not a hero but I won't stand by and watch people get killed either, there is a line.

Trying to intervene and save people is not a free pass to screw it up and kill innocent people, there are robbery situations where it's best just to cooperate and get the robber on his way without shots being fired. Every situation is obviously different....and there are tow types of people, those who think you do something no matter what, you don't let the bad guy get away, the other weighs whether it's worth unnecessarily endangering innocent people. Hero types can get people killed.
Successfully shoot the bad guy and you are a hero,... (show quote)


Very good post and great advice.

Reply
Jan 5, 2020 13:21:31   #
F.D.R.
 
Kevyn wrote:
I am curious, if you are in a shootout in your house and one of your shots go’s through a window and kills a neighbor kid are you liable. If someone kicks down my door and I dump a 30 round AR-15 mag on them am i on the hook for the stray shots that go through or past him.


In this day and age it would certainly involve a wrongful death lawsuit and, depending on the local authorities, whether criminal charges would be filed. As an Endowment member of the NRA I find it hard to fathom that any responsible gun owner would empty a 30 rd clip on an intruder, BUT if that were the case then he/she should be held liable.

Reply
Jan 5, 2020 13:23:54   #
F.D.R.
 
woodguru wrote:
Successfully shoot the bad guy and you are a hero, miss and hurt a bystander and you are guilty of a form of manslaughter, not intentional murder in the first degree.

I have carried concealed and done the processing on when it's my place to interfere with an armed robbery, if the person carries out his robbery and it doesn't look like anyone is going to get hurt I'll keep it to myself, if it looks like people could be killed I will intervene. The other factor here is the degree I have competed in pistol speed events, I know what I can do, and the chances of me missing is fairly low. I'm not a hero but I won't stand by and watch people get killed either, there is a line.

Trying to intervene and save people is not a free pass to screw it up and kill innocent people, there are robbery situations where it's best just to cooperate and get the robber on his way without shots being fired. Every situation is obviously different....and there are tow types of people, those who think you do something no matter what, you don't let the bad guy get away, the other weighs whether it's worth unnecessarily endangering innocent people. Hero types can get people killed.
Successfully shoot the bad guy and you are a hero,... (show quote)


110% correct !

Reply
 
 
Jan 5, 2020 13:31:48   #
F.D.R.
 
This is sort of related and something I've thought about for years. What's your opinion? Has a crime been committed ? It's the early morning hours and the streets are deserted you're walking along and you see someone approaching about a block away. As you get closer you happen to be directly in front of the individual so you both stop. At that moment you say to him "Nice watch, may I have it?" and he complies giving you his watch. Then you say, "May I have your wallet?" and he turns it over. You thank him and continue past. A minute later a police car rounds the corner and the man hails the officer and points to you saying you just robbed him. Would that be considered robbery? No threat, force or coercion was used.

Reply
Jan 5, 2020 14:13:07   #
Kevyn
 
archie bunker wrote:
Kev, Kev, Kev, are you trying to tailor the conversation here?

I mean, you bring the AR-15, 30 round mag, and a dead kid into it, and all.

Sorry, but I can see where you're going with this. It's obvious to me anyway.


Make it a dead old lady, letter carrier whatever you want.

Reply
Jan 5, 2020 14:52:48   #
moldyoldy
 
F.D.R. wrote:
This is sort of related and something I've thought about for years. What's your opinion? Has a crime been committed ? It's the early morning hours and the streets are deserted you're walking along and you see someone approaching about a block away. As you get closer you happen to be directly in front of the individual so you both stop. At that moment you say to him "Nice watch, may I have it?" and he complies giving you his watch. Then you say, "May I have your wallet?" and he turns it over. You thank him and continue past. A minute later a police car rounds the corner and the man hails the officer and points to you saying you just robbed him. Would that be considered robbery? No threat, force or coercion was used.
This is sort of related and something I've thought... (show quote)


This is where the silliness of stand your ground comes from.

Reply
Jan 5, 2020 14:53:43   #
moldyoldy
 
This seems a little bit relevant.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/10/us/florida-ups-truck-police-chase-shooting/index.html

Reply
 
 
Jan 5, 2020 15:35:16   #
Hug
 
F.D.R. wrote:
This is sort of related and something I've thought about for years. What's your opinion? Has a crime been committed ? It's the early morning hours and the streets are deserted you're walking along and you see someone approaching about a block away. As you get closer you happen to be directly in front of the individual so you both stop. At that moment you say to him "Nice watch, may I have it?" and he complies giving you his watch. Then you say, "May I have your wallet?" and he turns it over. You thank him and continue past. A minute later a police car rounds the corner and the man hails the officer and points to you saying you just robbed him. Would that be considered robbery? No threat, force or coercion was used.
This is sort of related and something I've thought... (show quote)


Of course it is robbery. The request carries an implied threat.

Reply
Jan 6, 2020 02:38:28   #
Cadillac
 
Kevyn wrote:
There have been a couple of recent shootings that have killed an intruder and a madman. Both have been applauded and fortunately ended with no innocents injured in the gunfights and the criminal killed. This brings up a question I would like opinions on. In the event that an armed citizen witnesses an armed robbery, engages the criminal and in the process accidentally injures or kills someone other than the assailant with a bullet passing through the assailant, missing the assailant or ricocheting off a surface should they be held criminally liable for the injury or death? In this scenario the robber has brandished his gun and demanded money but not fired a shot.
There have been a couple of recent shootings that ... (show quote)


Kevyn
I say the shooting lacks intent. However did the civilian follow safe shooting guidelines? “Be sure of your target, backstop & beyond”. He could be in serious trouble.

Reply
Jan 9, 2020 09:41:36   #
promilitary
 
Kevyn wrote:
There have been a couple of recent shootings that have killed an intruder and a madman. Both have been applauded and fortunately ended with no innocents injured in the gunfights and the criminal killed. This brings up a question I would like opinions on. In the event that an armed citizen witnesses an armed robbery, engages the criminal and in the process accidentally injures or kills someone other than the assailant with a bullet passing through the assailant, missing the assailant or ricocheting off a surface should they be held criminally liable for the injury or death? In this scenario the robber has brandished his gun and demanded money but not fired a shot.
There have been a couple of recent shootings that ... (show quote)


You're making up scenarios that aren't going to happen. Anyone who has firearms in his home in order
to protect life and property knows how to use that gun.

Reply
Jan 9, 2020 10:31:53   #
moldyoldy
 
promilitary wrote:
You're making up scenarios that aren't going to happen. Anyone who has firearms in his home in order
to protect life and property knows how to use that gun.


I would not count on that, too many accidental shootings.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.