One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Even Christianity Today Says Trump Has to Go
Page <<first <prev 5 of 6 next>
Dec 26, 2019 19:03:58   #
Rose42
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
I agree only to a certain extent, while I'll agree propaganda is on both sides, I find the intentions of the sides are at different ends of the pole. The left being for the people the right for corporations and the 2 percenters and up. JMO


I disagree. Democrats used to be for the people but those days are long gone. Neither party is. Democrats are also in bed with corporations just not the same ones.

We need a balance, not one or the other. The best of both which I don't think we'll ever get again.

Reply
Dec 26, 2019 19:25:22   #
DM
 
Barracuda2020: Guess any question is PERSONAL, if it involves lying or asking a PERSON what he
is on trial for?????? So, Hunter shouldn't be asked where did he get that PERSONAL INCOME? Gosh,
pretty darn soon, there won't be anything we can ask...and the crooks can have free reign anywhere and
anytime....the real trick, is DON'T GET CAUGHT, HUH? Just wondering?

Reply
Dec 26, 2019 19:26:22   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
slatten49 wrote:
https://www.learnreligions.com/top-christian-magazines-700327

If you want the Truth about Christianity, there is only one source for that and it isn't in a magazine published by postmodern Christians.

Reply
 
 
Dec 26, 2019 19:55:14   #
Cuda2020
 
Rose42 wrote:
I disagree. Democrats used to be for the people but those days are long gone. Neither party is. Democrats are also in bed with corporations just not the same ones.

We need a balance, not one or the other. The best of both which I don't think we'll ever get again.


I realize your stance, both are of the same coin, but I don't agree, all we have to do is look at what takes place under each administration, what freedoms and regulations and for whose benefit. Look at what Obama tried to put in place versus what Trump has come in and squshed not only those but what has also come before. It's all there if you take the time to research it. Tell me what has Trump put in place to help the everyday people? And I referring to what "he's" actually done and not for what he's taking credit for, from the momentum created by Obama.

Reply
Dec 26, 2019 20:00:44   #
Cuda2020
 
DM wrote:
Barracuda2020: Guess any question is PERSONAL, if it involves lying or asking a PERSON what he
is on trial for?????? So, Hunter shouldn't be asked where did he get that PERSONAL INCOME? Gosh,
pretty darn soon, there won't be anything we can ask...and the crooks can have free reign anywhere and
anytime....the real trick, is DON'T GET CAUGHT, HUH? Just wondering?


Tell me why is it so difficult for the right to differentiate between differences, I see it all the time and I'm sincerely wondering?

Income is NOT a personal issue, a BJ is, unless of course it was paid for, but that wasn't the case was it.
FYI all income has to be legally reported...LOL...ah the right

Reply
Dec 27, 2019 04:20:58   #
truthiness
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Tell me why is it so difficult for the right to differentiate between differences, I see it all the time and I'm sincerely wondering?

Income is NOT a personal issue, a BJ is, unless of course it was paid for, but that wasn't the case was it.
FYI all income has to be legally reported...LOL...ah the right
Tell me why is it so difficult for the right to di... (show quote)


Differences---Is there a difference in asking Hunter Biden to reveal his income compared to asking Trump to reveal his tax returns (i.e., his income)?

Reply
Dec 27, 2019 06:35:13   #
Rose42
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
I realize your stance, both are of the same coin, but I don't agree, all we have to do is look at what takes place under each administration, what freedoms and regulations and for whose benefit. Look at what Obama tried to put in place versus what Trump has come in and squshed not only those but what has also come before. It's all there if you take the time to research it. Tell me what has Trump put in place to help the everyday people? And I referring to what "he's" actually done and not for what he's taking credit for, from the momentum created by Obama.
I realize your stance, both are of the same coin, ... (show quote)


My post wasn’t a defense of Trump.

What did Obama do? He drove a wedge in this country. He was a racist. I’d have taken tougher times over that any day. He was a disaster as far as making the country better. He had a chance to really bring the country together and blew it.

Reply
 
 
Dec 27, 2019 22:26:41   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
slatten49 wrote:
https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/hillarys-america-the-secret-history-of-the-democratic-party-2016


Well, I just read roger Ebert's review on "Hillary's America" and find it preposterously biased, totally in denial of the Democrat Party's racist history.

Perhaps we might send Roger Ebert a copy of Jonah Goldberg's book: "Liberal Fascism" and solicit Ebert's review?

Reply
Dec 27, 2019 22:38:15   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
straightUp wrote:
That is literally a false statement because, there ARE people who already DO opt for socialism over capitalism. Maybe you mean to say... "before the majority opts.."?

Actually, I think people get too wound up about this whole "socialism vs capitalism" thing. There's no mutual exclusion. Most countries in the world today use a mix of capitalist AND socialist systems... And in terms of cash flow, the U.S. has both the largest capitalist system AND the largest socialist system in the world. Isn't that cool?
That is literally a false statement because, there... (show quote)


When the United States resorts to Medicare for All, socialized medicine, willfully giving up ownership of our own body, then we are neither a nation of free markets, nor free men.

Reply
Dec 27, 2019 23:07:32   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
truthiness wrote:
Differences---Is there a difference in asking Hunter Biden to reveal his income compared to asking Trump to reveal his tax returns (i.e., his income)?


Yes, there is a difference. President Trump's tax returns are reviewed every year by the IRS and he has proven squeaky clean for decades. His business competitors would really like to get hold of these tax returns and the Democrats want to discourage any future capitalist businessmen from presidential ambitions.

Hunter Trump? The jury is out. Obviously, the Democrats are using the Republicans to do their dirty work and diminish Joe Biden's presidential ambitions.

Let's ask questions about presidential contender Hillary Clinton's role in 9/11 with her long affiliation with the CIA and SYSTEMATICS at the Rose Law Firm, and the biggest electronic bank heist of $400 billion dollars funneled into the Bank of New York at 9/11/2001 midnight? The Bank of New York is the bank of choice of the Russian Mafia, now harbored in sanctuary city of San Francisco, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, a mafioso fugitive wanted for murder by INTERPOL, running "Open Russia" to topple Putin.

Read the E.P. Heidner Report "Collateral Damage 9/11" in its full, to the very end ,and you will discover the perpetrators of 9/11: ENRON, Robert Mueller, James Comey, the CIA, SYSTEMATICS, and Hillary Clinton and the Russian Mafia, all lined up like ducks in a row hiding behind very big fig leaves.

The Democrat Party will do anything to reinstate communism in Russia and topple the New Russian Federation, while they themselves are nothing more than a den of thieves.

https://wikispooks.com/w/index.php?title=Document:Collateral_Damage_911&printable=yes
Document:Collateral Damage 911
report by E. P. Heidner dated 2010/09/01From Wikispooks

"How 9/11 buried "the biggest financial crimes in history". An analysis of the highly complex web of US/UK covert operations and criminal banking activities going back to WW2, suggesting Western complicity in the collapse of the Soviet Union and the subsequent looting of Soviet industry. The ostensible settlement/roll-over for these instruments were dated through September 2001 and would have clinched several high-level criminal investigations had they been allowed to settle normally."

"The "tracking the money” project [Nazi and Japanese gold booty of WWII] was conducted over-all by Household International with the assistance reportedly of Systematics, a banking computer services firm, originally a subsidiary of an Arkansas-based operation. Targeted have been the banks of both friends and enemies alike. (Vince) Foster and his crew — Hillary (Rodham Clinton) and Webster (Hubbell) — used as a cover that they were supposedly "attorneys" for Systematics…. Vincent and Hillary's role in this was arranged and supervised by a Chicago-based law firm Hopkins & Sutter… [77].
[77] Clandestine Projects, Sherman H. Skolnick, Conspiracy Nation, — Vol. 8 Num. 18"

Reply
Dec 28, 2019 14:15:07   #
DM
 
TOALL: TO WHOEVER WANTS TO RESPOND....Just think how wonderful it is in NY...the greatest state
or one of the most liberal with crooks getting free reign...Gosh, seems now they can find their own
witnesses...prove their own defense. Is this great, or not? I'm thinking Chicago where Obama is "King On
The Hill," as he WAS King on the Hill during his presidency...Smollett can get out of his attack "on himself"
and prove it and Michelle (THE FOREVER FIRST LADY) can smile and laugh and know, we're out to
save any of you black people that want to destroy. We've got your back! This world isn't "going to
hell in a handbasket"...it is already there! Poor old Biden's son in his mansion need not worry...
gosh, there will be something to get him out of his troubles...just keep demanding Trump's taxes...
because really...we know the IRS didn't do a good enough job. They probably had a whole section
in their quarters with samples of Trump's taxes in every state he had to comply with. Little chance
that the Libs don't know everything already...just a ploy for attention. Didn't we all know that? Keeps
the media hot and the haters loving every minute. And so it goes..

Reply
 
 
Dec 28, 2019 17:39:12   #
truthiness
 
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
Yes, there is a difference. President Trump's tax returns are reviewed every year by the IRS and he has proven squeaky clean for decades. His business competitors would really like to get hold of these tax returns and the Democrats want to discourage any future capitalist businessmen from presidential ambitions.

Hunter Trump? The jury is out. Obviously, the Democrats are using the Republicans to do their dirty work and diminish Joe Biden's presidential ambitions.

Let's ask questions about presidential contender Hillary Clinton's role in 9/11 with her long affiliation with the CIA and SYSTEMATICS at the Rose Law Firm, and the biggest electronic bank heist of $400 billion dollars funneled into the Bank of New York at 9/11/2001 midnight? The Bank of New York is the bank of choice of the Russian Mafia, now harbored in sanctuary city of San Francisco, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, a mafioso fugitive wanted for murder by INTERPOL, running "Open Russia" to topple Putin.

Read the E.P. Heidner Report "Collateral Damage 9/11" in its full, to the very end ,and you will discover the perpetrators of 9/11: ENRON, Robert Mueller, James Comey, the CIA, SYSTEMATICS, and Hillary Clinton and the Russian Mafia, all lined up like ducks in a row hiding behind very big fig leaves.

The Democrat Party will do anything to reinstate communism in Russia and topple the New Russian Federation, while they themselves are nothing more than a den of thieves.

https://wikispooks.com/w/index.php?title=Document:Collateral_Damage_911&printable=yes
Document:Collateral Damage 911
report by E. P. Heidner dated 2010/09/01From Wikispooks

"How 9/11 buried "the biggest financial crimes in history". An analysis of the highly complex web of US/UK covert operations and criminal banking activities going back to WW2, suggesting Western complicity in the collapse of the Soviet Union and the subsequent looting of Soviet industry. The ostensible settlement/roll-over for these instruments were dated through September 2001 and would have clinched several high-level criminal investigations had they been allowed to settle normally."

"The "tracking the money” project [Nazi and Japanese gold booty of WWII] was conducted over-all by Household International with the assistance reportedly of Systematics, a banking computer services firm, originally a subsidiary of an Arkansas-based operation. Targeted have been the banks of both friends and enemies alike. (Vince) Foster and his crew — Hillary (Rodham Clinton) and Webster (Hubbell) — used as a cover that they were supposedly "attorneys" for Systematics…. Vincent and Hillary's role in this was arranged and supervised by a Chicago-based law firm Hopkins & Sutter… [77].
[77] Clandestine Projects, Sherman H. Skolnick, Conspiracy Nation, — Vol. 8 Num. 18"
Yes, there is a difference. President Trump's tax ... (show quote)


...
Sounds like two different juries: the IRS for Trump and __?___ for Biden? How do we know that the IRS has not "cleared" Biden?

I am not sure what Hillary has to do with the Trump and Biden issues. Looks like the frequently used "bait and switch" ploy that we see on this site so often. In this case connecting A to Z with no interacting connectors or worse information from Wikispooks, the conspiratorial rag.

At least Meryl Streep's version of tax evasion in "The Laundromat" contains a bit of humor. Maybe Scott Burns got the plot from wikispooks :).

Reply
Dec 30, 2019 01:42:41   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
truthiness wrote:
...
Sounds like two different juries: the IRS for Trump and __?___ for Biden? How do we know that the IRS has not "cleared" Biden?

I am not sure what Hillary has to do with the Trump and Biden issues. Looks like the frequently used "bait and switch" ploy that we see on this site so often. In this case connecting A to Z with no interacting connectors or worse information from Wikispooks, the conspiratorial rag.

At least Meryl Streep's version of tax evasion in "The Laundromat" contains a bit of humor. Maybe Scott Burns got the plot from wikispooks :).
... br Sounds like two different juries: the IRS f... (show quote)


Truthiness, don't forget that Hillary Clinton's handling of Benghazi and Judicial Watch's quest for her emails were whitewashed by FBI Director Comey when she was running for President against Donald Trump. In typical Alinsky style, the democrats are flipping the focus on Trump instead of Clinton.

Now, to further shield any further investigation into crooked Hillary's role in hiring the highly suspect Ukrainian CrowdStrike to analyze the DNC computer for evidence of "Russian hacking," Joe Biden is pushed to the forefront as a presidential contender, a sacrificial lamb to impede any further probing into Ukrainian corruption.

Don't forget, before the CIA sponsored Ukrainian civil war; the Russian Federation had offered to build a gas pipeline through the Ukraine to access the European Union with a cheap fuel supply. In turn the Ukrainians were guaranteed gas at such a low cost, it was nearly free.

Instead, the Obama administration wanted the Ukraine to abandon this huge windfall of freebee energy, so that the EU would purchase its energy from Iran, the biggest world sponsor of terrorism, China's proxy.

With Iran's sponsor of world terrorism, sending HAMAS and Hezbollah to Venezuela, we were being surrounded by an armed madhouse. This is the result of Hillary Clinton and John Kerry's foreign policy regarding the EU, Ukraine, China, Iran and Latin America. Imagine all of this with open borders to all illegal immigration under the Obama administration. This is unacceptable.

Reply
Dec 31, 2019 08:29:20   #
Cuda2020
 
truthiness wrote:
Differences---Is there a difference in asking Hunter Biden to reveal his income compared to asking Trump to reveal his tax returns (i.e., his income)?


Is Hunter running for the presidency? You guys really have a hard time connecting the dots.lol

Reply
Dec 31, 2019 08:37:03   #
Cuda2020
 
Rose42 wrote:
My post wasn’t a defense of Trump.

What did Obama do? He drove a wedge in this country. He was a racist. I’d have taken tougher times over that any day. He was a disaster as far as making the country better. He had a chance to really bring the country together and blew it.


He didn't drive the wedge, it's the people's own prejudices that created that. He can't change his skin color. He's no racist. No, who was a disaster was Bush who tanked the country, Obama brought it back even with the complete opposition from the right to make him fail, but he didn't. Now Trump, if reelected, will tank the country again.

Who blew it was the GOP as they turned their backs against our country all in their efforts to regain power and position.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 6 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.