One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Leftist policies hurt
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Dec 23, 2019 09:31:00   #
Weasel Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!
 
PeterS wrote:
Homosexuals have been around as long as man has been around. If they are a crime against nature than Man is a crime against nature. The truth is, just as nature made man so to did nature make homosexuals. The mistake made with our constitution is that it was written under the provision that all men are created equal. So until you are able to change the constitution I don't see what you think changing federal judges is going to do for you. Do you think they will rule in favor of a bunch of RW bigots instead of upholding the oath they swore to uphold? It's not the judges that you need to change but the piece of paper they have sworn an oath to uphold.

As for "welcoming 'them' into our communities and workplaces" homosexuals have always been in our communities and workplaces. No one welcomed anybody and certainly not you RW bigots. The only thing that happened was that their rights were recognized and ever since bigots such as yourself have been trying to strip those rights away.

Well, go ahead and try but you better hope that bigotry is contagious else you are going to lose the majority you now hold so fast enough it will make your head spin. Some people may find homosexuality disturbing but far more will find Right-Wing bigotry outright disgusting and something that needs to be banished once and for all...
Homosexuals have been around as long as man has be... (show quote)

As far as being a Right Winged Bigot, I think you misunderstood my reply.
I said that I learned to HATE LGBTQ's.
I am well aware of the presence of homosexuals in our community, going back to 1960 and never had a problem with them. My own brother and sister are homosexuals. No problem with that. They as well as myself know our place in society.
It was the LGBTQ AGENDA that taught me to hate the thought of having them in our world.
They have to push their beliefs with demonstrations, dressing infants up and parading them in their Gay Pride Parades,
and creating the Rainbow Coalition to force their position into places that it did not belong. {I never saw the Whitehouse being used as a billboard for advertising purposes} Until Obama and his administration decided that they had to Fundamentally Change America. It was the LGBTQ Community that taught me to Hate Everything They Stand For.
In closing, would I be able to light up the Whitehouse with colored print that says I want Guns to be accepted and owned by every citizen, including kids under 12 years old? Can I preach anti-gun control in our classrooms and kindergartens?
So you see I do not fit the definition of a Bigot, but I do learn from current events.
MAGA TRUMP 2020.

Reply
Dec 23, 2019 12:52:09   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
PeterS wrote:
You guys are the protectors of the constitution. Does it not protect the rights of the minority? So explain why the percentage of the population matters?


There is nothing that anyone can do to help the homosexuals. Them being made a focal point is not a right of the minority. They deserve to be treated like anyone else. Turning them into a special interest group violates the rights of the majority. I heard it was about 2%.

Reply
Dec 23, 2019 12:56:57   #
Weasel Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!
 
bilordinary wrote:
There is nothing that anyone can do to help the homosexuals. Them being made a focal point is not a right of the minority. They deserve to be treated like anyone else. Turning them into a special interest group violates the rights of the majority. I heard it was about 2%.


Agreed 100%
End of story!

Reply
 
 
Dec 23, 2019 12:59:40   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
Weasel wrote:
As far as being a Right Winged Bigot, I think you misunderstood my reply.
I said that I learned to HATE LGBTQ's.
I am well aware of the presence of homosexuals in our community, going back to 1960 and never had a problem with them. My own brother and sister are homosexuals. No problem with that. They as well as myself know our place in society.
It was the LGBTQ AGENDA that taught me to hate the thought of having them in our world.
They have to push their beliefs with demonstrations, dressing infants up and parading them in their Gay Pride Parades,
and creating the Rainbow Coalition to force their position into places that it did not belong. {I never saw the Whitehouse being used as a billboard for advertising purposes} Until Obama and his administration decided that they had to Fundamentally Change America. It was the LGBTQ Community that taught me to Hate Everything They Stand For.
In closing, would I be able to light up the Whitehouse with colored print that says I want Guns to be accepted and owned by every citizen, including kids under 12 years old? Can I preach anti-gun control in our classrooms and kindergartens?
So you see I do not fit the definition of a Bigot, but I do learn from current events.
MAGA TRUMP 2020.
As far as being a Right Winged Bigot, I think you ... (show quote)


I think the biggest tort against them is them being used as a political tool.

Reply
Dec 23, 2019 15:39:01   #
fredlott63
 
PeterS wrote:
And why are you afraid to answer my questions, Fred? Abortions have been around as long as women realized they were pregnant and no man was willing to help them. That's been for thousands of years Fred and no doubt millions of abortions over that time. You and your ilk didn't seem to care about abortions then though did you? Nope, as long as it was out of your sight it was out of your mind. You didn't start caring until we started counting and then suddenly abortion was the most horrible thing to beset this country. Oh, the horror you cry! See what E-vile you liberals have done...sniffle, sniffle!

Well, no one is asking you to have an abortion Fred and no one is pointing a gun at little Suzy's head and making her have an abortion either. The only thing that's been done is to offer little Suzy a better option than a coat hanger--an option that you and those like you are determined to put in her hand. You're a hypocrite and a zealot Fred and would be responsible for the deaths of untold numbers of girls and their fetus if given the opportunity. Your only interest in abortions is in numbers--women and their unwanted babies weren't your concern before RvW and they won't be after RvW.

Pray on that why don't you Fred because if this useless Troll can see right through your sorry ass do you think your god is going to be blind to what you hold in your heart? I think not Fred so while you are pointing your crooked finger at me somehow I think it is pointing right back at you...

And Happy Holidays to you Fred. May goodwill spread your way and none in your family's family ever need an abortion...
And why are you afraid to answer my questions, Fre... (show quote)


The questions are stupid. I raised my kids to know sex leads to pregnancy.

Reply
Dec 23, 2019 15:45:36   #
fredlott63
 
lpnmajor wrote:
70 million? That's pure poppycock. There are far more spontaneous abortions ( miscarriages ) than there are elective abortions, most due to lack of prenatal care, poor nutrition, and genetic damage from man made toxins in the environment. Where's the outrage about that?

The USA has an infant mortality rate on par with 3rd world countries. Where's the outrage about that? The USA has a maternal mortality rate on par with 3rd world countries? Where's the outrage about that?

Please keep your fake righteous indignation to yourself.
70 million? That's pure poppycock. There are far m... (show quote)


no

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 00:13:20   #
JW
 
PeterS wrote:
You guys are the protectors of the constitution. Does it not protect the rights of the minority? So explain why the percentage of the population matters?


It certainly does safeguard the rights of the minorities. Percentage has nothing to do with rights but with cost/benefit calculations. Do you think we should spend the same money on 4% of the population as we spend on the other 96%?

If you say that we should spend the same on each per person, I will agree with you but that still means we spend $96.00 on the majority and $4.00 on the minority. (I'm not representing the reality of every minority, just the generalized reckoning in this example.) It also means the other aspects of the minority should reflect the population numbers. Why should the 96% be required to give up what they have because a minority wants it?

Every American citizen has a right to the Constitutional guarantees and access to government services irrespective of their population size or other minority factors. No American citizen has any right to be artificially established/propped-up as an equal in any outcome determined by that individuals capabilities or efforts.

Reply
 
 
Dec 24, 2019 07:59:13   #
Big Kahuna
 
PeterS wrote:
And what was the body count before abortions were legalized? And remember to throw in all the mothers who died as well as their fetus from the use of coat hanger and other foreign objects--and you need to take your count back to the time when women realized where babies came from because that's when they first started having abortions.

And what do homosexuals being a minority have to do with having the same rights as others? Since when does our constitution not protect the rights of the minority? As for the institution of marriage, mine is doing just fine. If your marriage fell apart then maybe it wasn't built on the right foundation to begin with. Don't blame liberals because you built your marriage on a faux institution. We built our marriages on love as that's the only institution necessary...
And what was the body count before abortions were ... (show quote)

# of women and babies killed yearly by having a coat hanger abortion---- 250. # of babies murdered yearly by women with the help of their leftist baby murdering demorat party--- 1 million. Do you see a little difference in these numbers bonehead??

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 08:02:54   #
Big Kahuna
 
PeterS wrote:
And what was the body count before abortions were legalized? And remember to throw in all the mothers who died as well as their fetus from the use of coat hanger and other foreign objects--and you need to take your count back to the time when women realized where babies came from because that's when they first started having abortions.

And what do homosexuals being a minority have to do with having the same rights as others? Since when does our constitution not protect the rights of the minority? As for the institution of marriage, mine is doing just fine. If your marriage fell apart then maybe it wasn't built on the right foundation to begin with. Don't blame liberals because you built your marriage on a faux institution. We built our marriages on love as that's the only institution necessary...
And what was the body count before abortions were ... (show quote)


Love is fine but you forgot the word "morality". Love and morality is what marriage is built on plus the concept of one "man" and one "woman" as the law of the land and approved by a higher authority, GOD. Keagan and Ginsberg did not recuse themselves as they should have for being biased in this Supreme Court decision. Keagan is a lesbian and Ginsberg had already married a gay couple before this case came to the Supreme Court.

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 08:03:56   #
cbpat1
 
PeterS wrote:
And what was the body count before abortions were legalized? And remember to throw in all the mothers who died as well as their fetus from the use of coat hanger and other foreign objects--and you need to take your count back to the time when women realized where babies came from because that's when they first started having abortions.

And what do homosexuals being a minority have to do with having the same rights as others? Since when does our constitution not protect the rights of the minority? As for the institution of marriage, mine is doing just fine. If your marriage fell apart then maybe it wasn't built on the right foundation to begin with. Don't blame liberals because you built your marriage on a faux institution. We built our marriages on love as that's the only institution necessary...
And what was the body count before abortions were ... (show quote)



Well that answered that question

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 08:16:31   #
Big Kahuna
 
PeterS wrote:
And how do the rights of homosexuals supersede the rights of the majority? Give me an example. As for Hollywood, I don't see what that has anything to do with anything? Is homosexuality represented anymore then is typical in our country. The only thing that has happened is that if we see two men or two women together we no longer sit there and whisper...whispers that more often than not, were wrong in their meaning.

The only thing Hollywood has done is to get us to stop judging people simply by the company they keep. Two men eating lunch together might just be two men eating lunch together and no more worth a second look then they were a first.
And how do the rights of homosexuals supersede the... (show quote)


Did you forget about the cake makers who were Christians and did not want to make a homosexual wedding cake?? The militant homosexual lgbtqxyz bigoted anti -Christian group forced the issue and put the moral company out of business. The Supreme Court then ruled in favor of the Christian bakery. There are many other examples of this going on in our country. Moral values and a contract between one man and one woman has been watered down. Soon it will be 1 man marrying 10 women and polygamy will be enforced by people like you. Women already want to marry their dogs. Where does this stop?? Will incestual marriages be approved? There is love between a father for his daughter. Why should they not be allowed to marry? Small minded people like you have no reasoning power.

Reply
 
 
Dec 24, 2019 08:20:08   #
Big Kahuna
 
Kickaha wrote:
You misunderstand what I was saying. When you start forcing people to support something against their religious principles you are forcing the rights of the minority to supersede the rights of the majority. The case of the baker who offered to sell the gay couple a generic wedding cake, but wouldn't do a custom cake is a case in point. As for Hollywood and its programs, I merely said don't force a social agenda into the story if it doesn't advance the story. I don't care if a character is gay or straight, if the sexual orientation doesn't play a role in the story, don't force it in there. Some times I think its done just to stir up controversy and try to get some free publicity.
You misunderstand what I was saying. When you star... (show quote)


The minute I see a program endorsing homosexuality, I shut the tv off. This has become too commonplace. You would think at least 80% of Americans are gay considering how the media continually pushes this perverted lifestyle.

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 08:22:34   #
Big Kahuna
 
American Vet wrote:
And what rights are homosexual being denied?


The right to have superior rights is being impeeded. The lgbtqxyz terrorists don't like that.

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 08:25:30   #
Big Kahuna
 
lpnmajor wrote:
70 million? That's pure poppycock. There are far more spontaneous abortions ( miscarriages ) than there are elective abortions, most due to lack of prenatal care, poor nutrition, and genetic damage from man made toxins in the environment. Where's the outrage about that?

The USA has an infant mortality rate on par with 3rd world countries. Where's the outrage about that? The USA has a maternal mortality rate on par with 3rd world countries? Where's the outrage about that?

Please keep your fake righteous indignation to yourself.
70 million? That's pure poppycock. There are far m... (show quote)


Oh please cut the crap. Since when was a spontaneous abortion the same as a planned immoral abortion promoted by the demorat party and leftists like you? ? You are a phoney.

Reply
Dec 24, 2019 08:29:55   #
Big Kahuna
 
Kevyn wrote:
There is a church near my home that puts up a display of crosses with a sign saying something like each cross represents 100 abortions, last year someone swapped the sign with one that said each cross represents 100 children molested by priests. The entire display was removed that day.


Homosexual priests should indeed be castigated and thrown out of the Catholic church. I have said that for years, their closeness to little boys and their sexual drive gets them in trouble. Gay priests molesting little boys is a serious crime and a great moral offense to God.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.