One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
What Are They Afraid Of?
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
Dec 22, 2019 21:58:00   #
zillaorange
 
lindajoy wrote:
Myself included~~ 👏🏻👏🏻💫✨❤️


Why am I not suprised ?

Reply
Dec 22, 2019 22:47:46   #
Kickaha Loc: Nebraska
 
The Democrats don't know how to handle Trump. They are used to Republicans caving in at the least opposition. Support him or not, you have to give him credit for fighting back. Maybe he could be a bit more 'diplomatic' in how he does it, but that wouldn't be him.

Reply
Dec 22, 2019 23:49:12   #
Willy46 Loc: Lalland
 
Kevyn wrote:
Without assurance of a fair trial they can’t effectively confront the imminent threat, Pelosi is carefully playing the hand corrupt sycophant republicans under Moscow Mitch have handed her and she is doing it well.


Kevyn: you are such a piece of work. Now, after the dems did all they could to assure that Trump would not be shown even one iota of fairness in the House proceedings (and, by the way, that fact was painfully obvious to all), Pelosi and what's his name want a quid pro quo to assure, to quote you, a "fair trial" in the Senate. Give me a fricking break! Delusional....Love and kisses from a dedicated American.

Reply
 
 
Dec 23, 2019 00:23:11   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
Good bye to all the morally lost bootlickers. Get rid of them all!
Merry Christmas to all ( but the morally corrupt - you guys n gals can suck a lemon)!

The country is more important than the party

Reply
Dec 23, 2019 05:24:23   #
JIM BETHEA
 
lindajoy wrote:
Myself included~~ 👏🏻👏🏻💫✨❤️


Back at you comrade....

Reply
Dec 23, 2019 05:40:17   #
zillaorange
 
Kickaha wrote:
The Democrats don't know how to handle Trump. They are used to Republicans caving in at the least opposition. Support him or not, you have to give him credit for fighting back. Maybe he could be a bit more 'diplomatic' in how he does it, but that wouldn't be him.



Reply
Dec 23, 2019 05:45:09   #
zillaorange
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
In my experience, there's never been a spin, but rather a comprehension and perspective problem should I say from only the right, as you would say only the left?

Just as before, I made a post and I mentioned the efforts to finding an honorable candidate, that was all, but somehow in the perception of the person reading it, they concluded I only meant a lefty, I did not, that was completely on him and his narrow viewpoint.


Except for Abe & probably George, he could have been king, honorable candidates do not politicians make !!!

Reply
 
 
Dec 23, 2019 05:46:34   #
zillaorange
 
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
I thought that McConnell's response re: Pelosi's House inaction was classic. He said that he didn't understand her trying to leverage anything by withholding from the Senate something they didn't want anyway.


This should be fun, watching two old (too) war horses have at it !

Reply
Dec 23, 2019 05:47:43   #
zillaorange
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
These are words the right wing talking point synchophants don't want to read/hear.

If he's not guilty of either article of impeachment, he should let the people in his administration answer their subpeonas and testify. Simple pimple. What is he afraid of? (Lol, we know the answer.)


Why give anything to a kangaroo court ?

Reply
Dec 23, 2019 05:49:04   #
zillaorange
 
zombinis3 wrote:
Impeachment is a two step process the house already has the articles approved and ready so Trump has been impeached.
Now the articles have to be sent to the senate for the second step the impeachment trial.
Sorry reread, may not be considered formal until presented.

Impeachment. If a federal official commits a crime or otherwise acts improperly, the House of Representatives may impeach—formally charge—that official. If the official subsequently is convicted in a Senate impeachment trial, he is removed from office.

Senate.gov › reference › Index › Impeachment

U.S. Senate: Impeachment
Impeachment is a two step process the house alread... (show quote)


Somehow slick willy got around that. How would you explain that ?

Reply
Dec 23, 2019 05:51:13   #
zillaorange
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Yeah!!! Why help your countrymen when you can help Russia instead?


useful at what ?

Reply
 
 
Dec 23, 2019 05:53:45   #
zillaorange
 
jwrevagent wrote:
I would lay odds that no Dem will be held accountable, never mind what Barr and the other guy investigating-they have not been since Rover was a pup, and he is now in his dotage. Still waiting for Holder to have to go to court about his contempt charge,he should have been disbarred and Hillary and Bill to answer for oh so many lies and cheating, and Obama for his obstruction-will never happen. Only conservatives are fair game, and if they are Christians, well, that makes it even more likely they will be targeted. No liberal ever ever has to pay for their crimes-none! And some one actually calls that "justice", and Nancy is afraid of the Senate being "unfair." Would not know fair or just if it slugged her in the puss!
I would lay odds that no Dem will be held accounta... (show quote)


Excellent points, sadly that pig won't fly.

Reply
Dec 23, 2019 06:35:06   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
lindajoy wrote:
Ohhh hush it mister 😂💋🤪😂

Soooooooo nice to see you!!! Ahhhhh, feeling home settling in...💋✨❤️

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you..




There you are....so nice to see you back LJ.

I hope all is well with my friend and her family.

You have a fantastic Christmas....again, great ro see you back on forum for a bit

Reply
Dec 23, 2019 06:42:28   #
zillaorange
 
Seems you've got the TOUCH ! Missed by many, many happy to see you again !

Reply
Dec 23, 2019 07:37:28   #
zombinis3 Loc: Southwest
 
zillaorange wrote:
Somehow slick willy got around that. How would you explain that ?


Bill got impeached and then it went to the Senate it was determined that the articles weren't enough to remove Clinton from office. So in response the Reps lost seats. Ether it was because the general public thought it was not enough reasons presented for impeachment or that the Senate fumbled the ball.
It may have been one reason why it took so long for the house to agree that an impeachment was needed. According to the polls the public was ready , what really pushed it over was the Ukraine call. Someone reported the conversation
it was checked, then verified then sent up the chain. One thing is for sure it appeared that both Nixon and Clinton both respected the system which gave Congress the power to check and balance the high office.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.