What Are They Afraid Of? (Page 4): Well, it was important but for us exactly the way they didn't want it to go. 2 non-crimes and 180 days until their articles are rescinded. I don't...

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

rjoeholl wrote:

So, in other words the impeachment farce wasn't all that important.

Well, it was important but for us exactly the way they didn't want it to go. 2 non-crimes and 180 days until their articles are rescinded. I don't see it happening, do you?

federally indicted mattoid

bylm1-Bernie wrote:

Now there's an asinine comment for you.

It's asinine all right. That the R party is now the Russian party

zillaorange

useful mattoid 45 wrote:

It's asinine all right. That the R party is now the Russian party

It's the socialist/ dems who are out to destroy the REPUBLIC ! Hook up with Kev & move to N. Korea. I'm sure they'll luv ya there !!!

jwrevagent

bylm1-Bernie wrote:

"Without assurance of a fair trial"? Ca... (show quote)

I would lay odds that no Dem will be held accountable, never mind what Barr and the other guy investigating-they have not been since Rover was a pup, and he is now in his dotage. Still waiting for Holder to have to go to court about his contempt charge,he should have been disbarred and Hillary and Bill to answer for oh so many lies and cheating, and Obama for his obstruction-will never happen. Only conservatives are fair game, and if they are Christians, well, that makes it even more likely they will be targeted. No liberal ever ever has to pay for their crimes-none! And some one actually calls that "justice", and Nancy is afraid of the Senate being "unfair." Would not know fair or just if it slugged her in the puss!

zillaorange

Kevyn wrote:

Without assurance of a fair trial they can’t effectively confront the imminent threat, Pelosi is carefully playing the hand corrupt sycophant republicans under Moscow Mitch have handed her and she is doing it well.

It's an attempt at a political coup, THEYVE FAILED !!! AS USUAL !!!

zillaorange

Barracuda2020 wrote:

I've read the constitution over several times. I b... (show quote)

The dumb bit-- hasn't got clue what to do next ! Guess we have to wait until Jan. to take care of Trump's threat to national security !!!

zillaorange

Smedley_buzkill wrote:

Just curious, how do you listen to testimony in a trial that has not yet begun?

They know the crimes he's thinking of committing after he's elected AGAIN in 2020 !

zombinis3 Loc: Southwest

bylm1-Bernie wrote:

Why help em?

In both parties there are three types of voters who voted in 2016,
The solid supporters, the ones who voted anyone but, the last voted because they liked what was being said. The first don't need to be convinced, The second are leaning one way or the other but will vote the other way if the right candidate was running. The third ones are having second thoughts. The second and third have to be convinced to stay the course. By allowing the subpoenaed people to say their piece it might be enough to convince the second and third voters.

Auntie Lulu

Kevyn wrote:

Without assurance of a fair trial they can’t effectively confront the imminent threat, Pelosi is carefully playing the hand corrupt sycophant republicans under Moscow Mitch have handed her and she is doing it well.

federally indicted mattoid

Auntie Lulu wrote:

img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)

Everyone should thumbs-down (with enthusiasm, which we all seem to have!) the obvious breach of the constitution. When you ask a foreign country for help with an election, that's BAD. When Nixon had some non-foreign burglars do it, that was Bad. What crosses the threshold for you cultists? Anything? Can he start shooting people?

Singularity

Lonewolf wrote:

No he has been impeached the senate will decide if he should be removed

Whether it is an asterisk or a question mark doesn't really matter, now does it? His name will no longer be clear in the history books.

If all the Senate was going to do was round file the Articles anyway, a question mark may be the more telling for future, less biased readers.

American Vet

zombinis3 wrote:

Impeachment is a two step process the house alread... (show quote)

And the House presented the evidence. Thus there is no need for the Senate to call any further witnesses - they evaluate the "evidence".....they are the jury.

Nancy is wanting more witnesses: Where were they earlier?

zillaorange

Auntie Lulu wrote:

img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)

He's a real JERK Auntie !

zillaorange

useful mattoid 45 wrote:

Everyone should thumbs-down (with enthusiasm, which we all seem to have!) the obvious breach of the constitution. When you ask a foreign country for help with an election, that's BAD. When Nixon had some non-foreign burglars do it, that was Bad. What crosses the threshold for you cultists? Anything? Can he start shooting people?

Yo useless, read muler !!!

zillaorange

Singularity wrote:

Whether it is an asterisk or a question mark doesn't really matter, now does it? His name will no longer be clear in the history books.

If all the Senate was going to do was round file the Articles anyway, a question mark may be the more telling for future, less biased readers.

His name was NEVER going to be clear, now or in the history books. I didn't vote for Trump, I voted AGAINST hitlery ! He said a lot of things I was happy to hear, he's pulled off some impressive hocus pocus. Now let's see what happens ?! It's been stated before, I've said it myself, we sadly vote for the lesser of 2 evils !!!