What troubles me is the lack of boundaries between personal and professional. Clearly this is retribution for performance of her patriotic duty to vote her conscience/belief! Instead of vigorously and virtuously defending his professional behavior which is under impeachment, he offers a bitter and venal personal attack, not upon the congresswoman who cast her vote, but rather upon the memory of a beloved for whom she is still tenderly grieving.

But I realize we are not talking about the same things. He was about a destructive personal ego fluffing errand. She was about a solemn professional/political act of duty.

The fact that he STILL has trouble keeping those categories straight is the reason he should be removed from office and prevented from holding office again. Just as, similarly, multiple and egregious examples of inability to understand and perform basic functions crucial to the task have disqualified his family, legally, from engaging in public/business acts of offering CHARITY!

Trump Faces Backlash After John Dingell Hell Joke During Michigan Rally: 'It's Below Basic Human Decency'

Shane Croucher

President Donald Trump faced a social media backlash after an off-color joke suggesting the late Democratic Congressman John Dingell was in Hell.

Dingell, a WWII veteran who represented Michigan from 1955 to 2015, died in February aged 92. His wife Debbie Dingell fought and won his seat and now sits in Congress.

On Wednesday she voted to impeach Trump over his alleged Ukraine-related misconduct. Trump, who was holding a rally in Michigan's Battle Creek, lashed out at Dingell.

Trump talked about an emotional call from Dingell to say thank you after he gave her husband what he described as "A plus" treatment upon his death, including the lowering of flags and offering the use of the Capitol Rotunda.

"She calls me up. 'It's the nicest thing that's ever happened. Thank you so much. John would be so thrilled. He's looking down, he'd be so thrilled. Thank you so much sir.' I said that's OK, don't worry about it," Trump said, relaying the call.

"Maybe he's looking up, I don't know. Maybe. Maybe. But let's assume he's looking down."

The president then said he "won't go into the conversation because it's not fair to do that" before emphasizing the thankfulness of Dingell's call and then highlighting that she voted to impeach.

Dingell responded on Twitter, describing the hurt Trump's rally comments had caused her.

"Mr. President, let's set politics aside. My husband earned all his accolades after a lifetime of service," she tweeted.

"I'm preparing for the first holiday season without the man I love. You brought me down in a way you can never imagine and your hurtful words just made my healing much harder."

"Standing with my friend @RepDebDingell tonight," tweeted Rep. Elissa Slotkin, another Michigan Democrat.

"Mr. President, shame on you. Going after Rep. John Dingell, a WWII vet and devoted public servant who spent his life fighting for Michiganders, demeans you and your office."

Norman Ornstein, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute think tank, said Dingell "was true a patriot and a sweet, sweet man."

"When I would have lunch with him in the House Dining Room, he made sure to say nice things to every person working there. His staff adored him. He was everything Donald Trump is not," Ornstein tweeted.

Rep. Fred Upton, a Michigan Republican, tweeted that he "always looked up to John Dingell - my good friend and a great Michigan legend. There was no need to 'dis' him in a crass political way. Most unfortunate and an apology is due."

Paul Rieckhoff, who served with the U.S. Army in Iraq and Afghanistan and who is now a prominent activist for veterans, also attacked Trump.

"Congressman John Dingell served in the Army in WW2 and went to college under the GI Bill," Rieckhoff tweeted. "And he's just the latest veteran to be disgustingly disrespected by Trump—a man who knows nothing of honor, respect or service."

Michigan State Senator Curtis Hertel, a Democrat, called the president's comments "below human decency."

"I don't know what's more sad; a President who attacks a deceased Congressman and his widow in their home state two weeks before Christmas or my friends on the other side of the aisle who will refuse to condemn it," Hertel tweeted.

"This is not just below the presidency, it's below basic human decency. The irony of this indecency is that John was one of the most decent people I ever knew.

"To be clear. John Dingell was a Veteran and a Statesman while President Trump is a Coward and blowhard. If you can't tell what side you're supposed to be on you're a d--- fool."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Newsweek asked the Trump 2020 campaign for comment by email and will update this article if one is provided. https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-takes-swipe-michigan-lawmaker-042800241.html

==============
News week is one of the most radical and liberal- biased magazines that portrays lies and falsehoods to the American public.

This was the excerpt from the magazine:
"She calls me up. 'It's the nicest thing that's ever happened. Thank you so much. John would be so thrilled. He's looking down, he'd be so thrilled. Thank you so much sir.' I said that's OK, don't worry about it," Trump said, relaying the call.

"Maybe he's looking up, I don't know. Maybe. Maybe. But let's assume he's looking down."

And the statement and words all blown up to retaliating ugliest description of the president's statement.

These were the words of “up and down” ,uttered by the president and all of a sudden, all the MSM including Slatten and the radical DEMS, and the MSM, had found the ugliest words and statements uttered to retaliate against the president.

The phrase of "up and down" said by the president did not mean ugly, or malicious, but you people made the meaning ugly. How polluted are your brains, just so you could destroy and spew your hatred towards the president? Every word he says or every action he does, you people use magnifying glass and turn the words so bad and ugly to destroy him.

Serving the military is a sacred honor. I salute them and must be respected. I honor and respect Congressman Dingell for that. My husband died for that; my uncles served and died for that. And the president is the only president who've afford them great honor; provided the most decent budget, and ready healthcare for all the sick and the wounded. He did not disrespect Dingell. It was the people who hate the president that made the words ugly, and Slatten called it “beyond human decency”.

Well, if we are just gonna go and make stuff up as we go along, try this one....

https://politics.theonion.com/trump-claims-he-knows-john-dingell-is-in-hell-because-h-1840538904
WASHINGTON—Clarifying controversial remarks he made about the deceased Michigan lawmaker last night, Donald Trump told reporters Thursday he can confirm the late congressman John Dingell is in hell because of the window into a terrifying inferno the president sees every time he closes his eyes. “Each night, when I lie down in bed, I feel the heat of eternal flames and hear the screams of the damned,” said Trump, explaining that he has gazed into the hideous abyss and seen Satan himself feasting upon the maggot-infested corpse of the long-serving former representative. “John’s definitely down there along with all the other poor souls crying out to be released from ceaseless torment. He’s always whispering that the fate awaiting me will be far, far worse than his, beyond anything I could possibly comprehend. Why do you think I barely sleep?” Members of the White House press pool were then seen running from the briefing room as the blood drained from the president’s face, his eyes rolled back in his head, and, using an inhumanly deep, guttural voice, he began to mutter strange incantations in Latin.

I do know if there is a person if pushed far enough that they will not retaliate in some way now whether it becomes a fist fight or something worse is all up in the air. But I suppose that Trump felt that he was being pushed and that it may have gone beyond the point of no return for him. I am not going to point fingers here but what do the democrats expect from the man he is after all only human and the democrats are literally trying to nail him to a tree so to speak. There is only one individual that didn't strike back and the killed him by nailing him to a tree. I am sure that there is enough blame on both sides to suffice for one election cycle. Maybe it will be better if both sides cool their heels for a bit and then try and work together. Just a thought is all.