Mikeyavelli

Omar ain't in jail because no one has the courage to prosecute her or any member of the Obama Clinton Cabal or the New Socialist Democrats.
Not until Trump appoints a new Attorney General after the election.

Mikeyavelli

👍👍👍

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

I'm just glad that unemployment is low because there are more people who work and contribute to my social security; a Ponzi scheme. I didn't create the system but I sure won't refuse the benefits.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

By that time, maybe she also won't be re-elected. I don't understand how these idiots get elected in the first place. I suppose it is human nature for people to say every congressperson is a crook and wants them gone, except for their own crook.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

I'm still working.

straightUp Loc: California

Please tell me you're not THAT naive. It's well known that crooks use ambiguous language to disguise their intentions. Putin has a long standing reputation for saying things without actually being literal. It's so common in fact that it finds its way into our film culture where we hear mob bosses say things like "take care of that thing"

So you really think anyone bribing a foreign government over the phone is going to make it crystal clear for all the records? No. He's going to be as vague as he can. Nowhere in that transcript do we actually see where Trump explains what that "favor" is. Obviously, he was assuming Zelensky knew what he meant without saying it.

Wow, it's just mind boggling what you folks expect us to believe. "Oh, he didn't actually say the word 'demand' so he's innocent." LOL!!!!


Actually it wasn't. The first article is titled as "abuse of power" but that is a direct reference to bribery which IS an abuse of power.


Oh, so all of a sudden opinions count? LOL Should I just assume than opinions that don't help Trump are without merit and the opinions that DO help Trump are gospel?

Also, saying they didn't know doesn't mean it wasn't delayed. It just means they didn't know about it. And maybe they didn't because their president didn't tell them yet. Or maybe they lied. Were they under oath when they said they didn't know?

The one thing we DO know for a fact is that OUR records show the funds were delayed. I want to say nice try but I can't really even say that.


Not without status reports and explanations. What we had here was an order from Trump to delay the funds without any explanation at all. Not the same thing.


Neither of us can because we were never involved with the process, although the timing was pretty dang suspicious. But people who WERE involved can certainly provide insight through their testimonies and they did. When you add that to everything else, a picture of the truth emerges. Have you ever heard of a little thing called deduction? You might not have since so many people on the right depend on Fox to spoon feed them with pre-assembled conclusions, but deduction is a way of finding those conclusions based on available evidence.


Uh-huh... well, I know what THAT means, LOL. Better luck next time.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

I’m simply arguing the law. Just because you call it bribery doesn’t mean shit there one trick. You are basing everything on assumptions. This would never go anywhere in an actual criminal case. Nothing criminal about a delay. Nothing. He’d have had to be on the record saying you either help me get Biden or you don’t get the aid. Furthermore they got the aid and there was no investigation started into Biden. So where did Trump receive anything of value? Oh, that’s right. He didn’t. Exactly why you are full of yourself. Your opinions aren’t fact. You’re actually starting to sound dense.

straightUp Loc: California

No you're not. You haven't even mentioned a law or so much as a legal precedent.


Article II, Section 4 of the U.S.Constitution:
The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

And we all know what bribery means.


There are different types of assumptions. Some are baseless and some are well-founded. My assumptions which are really the assumptions of the committee are well-founded.


Actually, it would. Most cases of non-violent crime are convicted on well-founded assumptions. Look up that word "deduction" it might help you understand things a little better. I kid you not, our legal system doesn't depend on criminals giving us step by step illustrations of their crimes.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Actually most convictions are not based on assumptions. They are based on facts and evidence; especially white collar crime. I know what article II says. Nowhere in the articles of impeachment do I see the word bribe. Believe me, if they could prove bribery it would be in there. You are looking foolish. Unless you have a paralegal certificate I guarantee I know more law than you do one trick. Give it up.

Cadillac

Better question; why hasn’t Obama come forward and admitted that Russian interference on his watch. Also better yet......why haven’t the Democrats offered evidence or allowed any witnesses?

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

There is your real Russian collusion. Obama promised Putin that after he was re-elected he would have greater latitude; all caught on an open microphone. Trump has enacted stronger sanctions and embargoes on Russia than Obama ever did. Trump has also warned the Russians to not meddle in our elections or face even greater consequences. By making America an energy exporter, Trump is hurting Russia's economy by lowering the price of oil and thus weakening Putin. This is something the environmentalists and the left don't understand.

debeda

Because that would illustrate that they've got NUTHIN

Mikeyavelli

I thought that you were retired.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Not yet.

Mikeyavelli

Omagosh.
...it's better than you imagine.