We need to get rid of this woman! (Page 2): Palestine existed under British mandate until 1948.

Fodaoson Loc: South Texas

Palestine existed under British mandate until 1948.

bggamers Loc: georgia

Kevyn wrote:

This article is unsubstantiated propaganda against a woman simply because she is standing up for the rights of the people in illegally occupied Palestine. She is doing exactly what the people in her district sent her to Washington to do and is wildly popular.

apparently not because they arent real happy with her and sevral people plan to run for seat because of it

Ricktloml

nwtk2007 wrote:

You don't really think we are afraid of her, do you?

Well we certainly should be concerned that jihadists have infiltrated our government. That of course happened en-masse during the Obama administration. Brennan was recruited by the Saudi Secret Police while he was section chief back in the 1990s. And he allowed the Muslim Brotherhood to fully infiltrate our security agencies and have access to our national secrets. Our records concerning radical Islamic terrorists were scrubbed to protect them. It was a travesty

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Ricktloml wrote:

Well we certainly should be concerned that jihadists have infiltrated our government. That of course happened en-masse during the Obama administration. Brennan was recruited by the Saudi Secret Police while he was section chief back in the 1990s. And he allowed the Muslim Brotherhood to fully infiltrate our security agencies and have access to our national secrets. Our records concerning radical Islamic terrorists were scrubbed to protect them. It was a travesty

Absolutely.

Cuda2020

nwtk2007 wrote:

You don't really think we are afraid of her, do you?

That's a big 10-4

Afraid of losing votes.

Cuda2020

padremike wrote:

You might ought to look closer at the women representatives in the Democrat/progressive line up. There is only one who may not be a disgrace to womanhood.

Funny how you point out only the women, I detect some bias there. I think women who are against their own gender rights are the ones who ought to be shamed, not to mention just plain dumb, kinda like rednecks being republicans. LOL

Rose42

Barracuda2020 wrote:

I've never seen a party so afraid of a little lady. LOL

In my lifetime I’d never have thought the once great democrat party would stoop to defending the likes of Omar who supports a known terrorist front organization.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Funny how you point out only the women, I detect some bias there. I think women who are against their own gender rights are the ones who ought to be shamed, not to mention just plain dumb, kinda like rednecks being republicans. LOL

p

You forgot to include racial bias - typical progressive trash talking. You jokers are so predictable. Gender rights? Women ashamed of their gender rights? That would not include the new right to kill their unborn child wouldn't it? Unfortunately, this new woman's right presumes that a father, one of the male gender, has no prenatal parental rights and should be rightly ashamed because he cannot protect his child wouldn't it? Here is where we find very real shame; shame that our society is thoroughly confused and corrupt. Generally speaking though, respect for women has seriously declined over the past 50 years. Society once trusted women to care for children.

I hold no bias towards women. I've been married to and deeply cherish my wife and mother of our children, a woman who has filled my life full of joy for 57 years. I do, however, believe that women have been deceived by other women to believe that unless they are able to do the same things a man can do they have no worth of merit. Close examination reveals this thought to be about as sexist as it gets.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Barracuda2020 wrote:

That's a big 10-4

Afraid of losing votes.

No effect on us.