Republicans and the Whistleblower (Page 4): Since when is lying an issue when dealing with trump?... I think I will follow the peoples testimony's & see what makes sense... so far its...

emarine

byronglimish wrote:

See...? More running away from the question of Schitt being a liar.

You are complicit with schitts vial behavior

Since when is lying an issue when dealing with trump?... I think I will
follow the peoples testimony's & see what makes sense... so far its not looking real good for trump... but Putin has been winning to date and enjoying trumps help... Schiff & Nunes are both annoying ... do you have a point?...

Seth

emarine wrote:

Quit making excuses Seth... your problem is the lefties have finally grown some balls and are following our Constitutional process to the T... trump is just too stupid to know when to shut up same as corrupt republicans... enjoy your fake reality on Fox ... trump manipulated the rule of law with Barr to slow down what was coming from being corrupt ... poor trump the victim, Hillary just couldn't get over losing 3 years ago right... you honorably served our Constitutional republic not trump...

You folks have pretty much shown that a Democrat can do anything he wants to do and it's fine. Hillary, Biden, whomever. You won't acknowledge a lie by Obama, 20+ flights logged on Epstein Air by Bill Clinton, nothing, but let anyone accuse Trump of whatever strikes their fancy, you're right on top of it, it's got to be 100% true because it's about Trump.

At what point do you see your side's credibility falling into question? Or don't you?

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

emarine wrote:

Since when is lying an issue when dealing with trump?... I think I will
follow the peoples testimony's & see what makes sense... so far its not looking real good for trump... but Putin has been winning to date and enjoying trumps help... Schiff & Nunes are both annoying ... do you have a point?...

Do I have a point? Not when in discourse with maroon.

emarine

Seth wrote:

You folks have pretty much shown that a Democrat c... (show quote)

Seems you're regressing further back in time again... as I remember slick Willie was impeached over a blow job in the oval office... or lying about it... trump lies much more every day about more important issues... you're full of excuses, how far back will you go to support trumps corrupt actions ...

Seth

emarine wrote:

Seems you're regressing further back in time again... as I remember slick Willie was impeached over a blow job in the oval office... or lying about it... trump lies much more every day about more important issues... you're full of excuses, how far back will you go to support trumps corrupt actions ...

When I see a corrupt action on Trump's part, I'll call it what it is. So far, all I see is a non-politician doing the best job as president of anyone in my 60+ years and losing somewhere in the ten digits in order to occupy the office.

emarine

Seth wrote:

When I see a corrupt action on Trump's part, I'll call it what it is. So far, all I see is a non-politician doing the best job as president of anyone in my 60+ years and losing somewhere in the ten digits in order to occupy the office.

losing somewhere in the ten digits in order to occupy the office.[/quote].... no problem when Putin covers your losses ...

Seth

emarine wrote:

.... no problem when Putin covers your losses ...

That's exactly what I mean. Pure bullshit, no suggestion of evidence whatsoever to support this constant "Putin this, Putin that" rhetoric where Trump is concerned.

You people have nothing but B.S. to offer in that regard, then you believe you actually deserve to be viewed as being in any way credible. Right.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

emarine wrote:

.... no problem when Putin covers your losses ...

Even Hillary laughs at your premise.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Seth wrote:

That's exactly what I mean. Pure bullshit, no suggestion of evidence whatsoever to support this constant "Putin this, Putin that" rhetoric where Trump is concerned.

You people have nothing but B.S. to offer in that regard, then you believe you actually deserve to be viewed as being in any way credible. Right.

He's full of schitt.

emarine

Seth wrote:

That's exactly what I mean. Pure bullshit, no suggestion of evidence whatsoever to support this constant "Putin this, Putin that" rhetoric where Trump is concerned.

You people have nothing but B.S. to offer in that regard, then you believe you actually deserve to be viewed as being in any way credible. Right.

trumps son stated they were funded by Russia after losing close to a billion in business failures dumped on the taxpayer... someone kept trump crapping on gold ...

Seth

emarine wrote:

trumps son stated they were funded by Russia after losing close to a billion in business failures dumped on the taxpayer... someone kept trump crapping on gold ...

So that somehow means that even years later, as POTUS, he's working for Putin?

What happened to "that was then, this is now?"

If Trump was catering to Putin, he wouldn't have armed the Ukrainians with anti-tank weapons, for example.

promilitary

PeterS wrote:

The only reason Republicans want to know who the whistleblower is to denigrate, demean, and otherwise reduce him to nothing because they can't beat the argument so they have to try to destroy the one making it!

The content of the complaint is suspect without the whistleblower testifying.