None of it gets to me. I am able to sort out the BS and go on. Some folks can't get past it and they get filled with anger and worries.
docwill wrote:
You're asking rhetorical questions so 1) maybe answer them yourself and 2) keep your scandals and numbers straight.
Beck was too conspiratorial for Fox; his numbers and ad revenue did, and do, smoke the competition; seems Fox isn't the "right-wing" medium you Leftists lie about. Fox has nothing to do with the U.K. Murdoch empire. But, interestingly, James Rosen WAS personally targeted by Holder. I'm sure that has you v. upset...
MSNBC has very little news so it's difficult for liberals to tell news from commentary. Key word for FOX is they report, you decide and that requires thought which liberals don't seem to like.
vernon wrote:
o'rilley and hannity are not news programs,they are commentary on news of the day, now explain why the absolute lise that msnbc spreads as news.
Nickolai wrote:
The techniques Roger Ailes uses to mold the opinion of conservsatives is a form of brain washing The word play they use, the way they distort ,omit, and, selectivly edit video. The dedicated watchers don't seem to notice, they just like to get there news and opinion mixed together and presented the way they like to hear it.
You almost hit the nail right on it's head, Nick. To do so, you should have substituted MSNBC for Roger Ailes and LIBDEMS for conservatives! That way it's a perfect post!
BTW it's "their" not "there."
docwill wrote:
yourquote=Nickolai]Are you kidding .
Like I said, go back to Ed Schultz and Co.; you'll get your snark, nasty personal attacks and no heartburn from severe cognitive dissonance.
Do you even recognize your contradictions and false assumptions?[/quote]
To this day I can close my eyes and still see Schultz striding toward the camera, pointing his finger at it and ranting, "The Republicans are evil. They want you dead!"
Btfkr wrote:
Just shows to go how stupid Americans are. Sad.
bmac32 wrote:
Yeah they voted for a DEMOCRAT!
Well, sure, but he was the least objectional of the two choices to most Americans...TWICE! :lol:
Has it yet sunk into the neocon/Defective general mindset that your GOP "leaders" (the .01% that lead the rest of y'all around by your collective nose)
intentionally picked the worst possible candidates to run?
THEY DIDN'T WANT TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING UP BU$$H'S MESS!
The GOP plan, from the very beginning, was "
Let the n****r clean up things, that why he have 'em...but make sure he doesn't get another term"...until mid 2007, when they discovered they'd hampered Obama too much, so there was still a lot of fixing to do, when it became "
The n****r didn't get finished in time, so we have to lose this one, too...let's see, who're are the least likely of our Useful Idiots to win...ok, let's get this dog-and-pony show started"...
2016 may be just as bad for The Dreaded Republican Menace, though...the American people may have started paying attention! ;-)
Have never denied Bush made a mess but he had lots oh help with a 10 trillion debut, so 17 trillion is fixing that mess and that was with his own party.
Terry Allan Hall wrote:
Well, sure, but he was the least objectional of the two choices to most Americans...TWICE! :lol:
Has it yet sunk into the neocon/Defective general mindset that your GOP "leaders" (the .01% that lead the rest of y'all around by your collective nose) intentionally picked the worst possible candidates to run?
THEY DIDN'T WANT TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING UP BU$$H'S MESS!
The GOP plan, from the very beginning, was "Let the n****r clean up things, that why he have 'em...but make sure he doesn't get another term"...until mid 2007, when they discovered they'd hampered Obama too much, so there was still a lot of fixing to do, when it became "The n****r didn't get finished in time, so we have to lose this one, too...let's see, who're are the least likely to win...ok, let's get this dog-and-pony show started"...
2016 may be just as bad for The Dreaded Republican Menace...the American people have started paying attention! ;-)
Well, sure, but he was the least objectional of th... (
show quote)
bmac32 wrote:
Have never denied Bush made a mess but he had lots oh help with a 10 trillion debut, so 17 trillion is fixing that mess and that was with his own party.
Yes, the GOP added
greatly to the National Debt, partially by not standing
with the President, but by throwing as many roadblocks in his way as they could, out of fear that the American people might re-elect him...remember how that worked for The Dreaded Republican Menace,
The Party Of Personal Responsibility... ;-) 8-) :lol:
Slamdunk wrote:
You apparently STILL don't know that "George Soros" isn't "George Soros's real name!
You need to get a copy of Zev Chafets great book, "Roger Ailes Off Camera" and read it; then you'd know why Fox News consistently makes "Commie News Network" and "Misguided Suckers & Nothing But Communists" cry their eyes out every month.
Look I couldn't care less about George Soros. To me he is just a Hungarian immigrant and that he was born and lived under both the Nazias and communist fled to London and the US and that he made a Billion Dollars on the British Pound one and that's what brought him to my attention. So he donates a lot of money to progresive casuses so what . How about Shelden Adelson, the Koch brothers and all the billionares who pour millions into right wing causes.
Btfkr
Loc: just outside the Mile High City
Terry Allan Hall wrote:
Well, sure, but he was the least objectional of the two choices to most Americans...TWICE! :lol:
Has it yet sunk into the neocon/Defective general mindset that your GOP "leaders" (the .01% that lead the rest of y'all around by your collective nose) intentionally picked the worst possible candidates to run?
THEY DIDN'T WANT TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING UP BU$$H'S MESS!
The GOP plan, from the very beginning, was "Let the n****r clean up things, that why he have 'em...but make sure he doesn't get another term"...until mid 2007, when they discovered they'd hampered Obama too much, so there was still a lot of fixing to do, when it became "The n****r didn't get finished in time, so we have to lose this one, too...let's see, who're are the least likely of our Useful Idiots to win...ok, let's get this dog-and-pony show started"...
2016 may be just as bad for The Dreaded Republican Menace, though...the American people may have started paying attention! ;-)
Well, sure, but he was the least objectional of th... (
show quote)
HAHAHA! Could not have said it better my own self :thumbup: :thumbup: :mrgreen:
Nickolai wrote:
Look I couldn't care less about George Soros. To me he is just a Hungarian immigrant and that he was born and lived under both the Nazias and communist fled to London and the US and that he made a Billion Dollars on the British Pound one and that's what brought him to my attention. So he donates a lot of money to progresive casuses so what . How about Shelden Adelson, the Koch brothers and all the billionares who pour millions into right wing causes.
i dont think they are trying to over throw our capitolest society for communism or natziism.
vernon wrote:
i dont think they are trying to over throw our capitolest society for communism or natziism.
If we listen to hate radio, conservative web sites and Faux News channel it soon becomes apparent that George Soros has been turned into a boogey man. The boogey man is worth 20 billion dollars and the Koch brothers are worth over 70 billion combined. Right away common sense should prevail upon a conservative afraid of Soros. He doesn't have the resources of the megalomaniac brothers. A visit to the aformentioned sites in the conservative media-sphere you will hear that Soros has spent $550 million since 1979 in the US on liberal causes. and fail to note that he has disclosed every dollar, because he believes in transparency and an open society.
Btfkr
Loc: just outside the Mile High City
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
I love it and that's just the tip of the iceberg.
Nickolai wrote:
If we listen to hate radio, conservative web sites and Faux News channel it soon becomes apparent that George Soros has been turned into a boogey man. The boogey man is worth 20 billion dollars and the Koch brothers are worth over 70 billion combined. Right away common sense should prevail upon a conservative afraid of Soros. He doesn't have the resources of the megalomaniac brothers. A visit to the aformentioned sites in the conservative media-sphere you will hear that Soros has spent $550 million since 1979 in the US on liberal causes. and fail to note that he has disclosed every dollar, because he believes in transparency and an open society.
If we listen to hate radio, conservative web sites... (
show quote)
there are several
front groups that he supports
Btfkr
Loc: just outside the Mile High City
Nickolai wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
I love it and that's just the tip of the iceberg.
:thumbup: :thumbup: one could spend the whole day just watching videos of the foxters lying their asses off :XD:
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.