Now what do the cons want? So the 'whistleblower' has agreed to answer con questions in writing, and still the congress cons are whining and crying. Their only hope is to find a way to...

factnotfiction

So the 'whistleblower' has agreed to answer con questions in writing, and still the congress cons are whining and crying.

Their only hope is to find a way to discredit this person, so no matter what the answers are, the cons will carry on like the rowdy little children they are when they can't get their way.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/whistleblower-gop-questions-lawyer-nunes-schiff

Liberty Tree

[quote=factnotfiction]So the 'whistleblower' has agreed to answer con questions in writing, and still the congress cons are whining and crying.

Their only hope is to find a way to discredit this person, so no matter what the answers are, the cons will carry on like the rowdy little children they are when they can't get their way.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/whistleblower-gop-questions-lawyer-nunes-schiff[/quote
]
You mean Schiff will tell him how to not answer questions fully. You do not want him to be discredited the way Democrats try to discredit everyone who gets in their way.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

factnotfiction wrote:

So the 'whistleblower' has agreed to answer con questions in writing, and still the congress cons are whining and crying.

Their only hope is to find a way to discredit this person, so no matter what the answers are, the cons will carry on like the rowdy little children they are when they can't get their way.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/whistleblower-gop-questions-lawyer-nunes-schiff

The whistleblower has already discredited his self...by conspiring With Schiff to perjure himself.

teabag09

[quote=Liberty Tree]

factnotfiction wrote:

So the 'whistleblower' has agreed to answer con qu... (show quote)

Schitt is the whistleblower. He's at it again making crap up. Just like his definite evidence that the President colluded that Schitt has had for three years and yet has not produced one single piece.

When everything is exposed to the light of day, Schitt, Madam Antsy Nancy, Monsur Schumer are going to be in as Ms. Warren would say be in heap big trouble. Mike

PeterS

factnotfiction wrote:

So the 'whistleblower' has agreed to answer con questions in writing, and still the congress cons are whining and crying.

Their only hope is to find a way to discredit this person, so no matter what the answers are, the cons will carry on like the rowdy little children they are when they can't get their way.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/whistleblower-gop-questions-lawyer-nunes-schiff

Very true. Discrediting him is the only argument they know how to make.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

factnotfiction wrote:

So the 'whistleblower' has agreed to answer con questions in writing, and still the congress cons are whining and crying.

Their only hope is to find a way to discredit this person, so no matter what the answers are, the cons will carry on like the rowdy little children they are when they can't get their way.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/whistleblower-gop-questions-lawyer-nunes-schiff

If he were discredited it wouldn't phase you?

Odd....

It would bother most people to know the source of the information was compromised...

waltmoreno

factnotfiction wrote:

So the 'whistleblower' has agreed to answer con questions in writing, and still the congress cons are whining and crying.

Their only hope is to find a way to discredit this person, so no matter what the answers are, the cons will carry on like the rowdy little children they are when they can't get their way.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/whistleblower-gop-questions-lawyer-nunes-schiff

Hmmmm. I'm trying to imagine how fair that would be in a trial. Where you can't (1) observe the person's demeanor when answering, (2) where you can't ask a quick follow up question after an unsatisfactory answer, and (3) where answers would obviously be prepared by attorneys and then signed by the whistleblower.
No court proceeding would allow that as due process for cross examination.
It shouldn't be allowed to thwart the will of the public who elected Donald Trump.

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

factnotfiction wrote:

So the 'whistleblower' has agreed to answer con questions in writing, and still the congress cons are whining and crying.

Their only hope is to find a way to discredit this person, so no matter what the answers are, the cons will carry on like the rowdy little children they are when they can't get their way.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/whistleblower-gop-questions-lawyer-nunes-schiff

In other words, you're OK with the dems continuing to get "special" treatment and procedures to undermine the truth. That's typical liberal crap!

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

factnotfiction wrote:

So the 'whistleblower' has agreed to answer con questions in writing, and still the congress cons are whining and crying.

Their only hope is to find a way to discredit this person, so no matter what the answers are, the cons will carry on like the rowdy little children they are when they can't get their way.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/whistleblower-gop-questions-lawyer-nunes-schiff

They know Trumps guilty, so this kind of foolishness is all they've got.

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

lpnmajor wrote:

They know Trumps guilty, so this kind of foolishness is all they've got.

The whole fake impeachment scam is the dem's kind of foolishness. It's going to boil down to "opinion" and "interpretation" of a few words. There was no need for opinion or interpretation of Biden's shake-down of the Ukraine....it was clear, but the Dems/libs didn't raise and eyebrow.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

waltmoreno wrote:

Hmmmm. I'm trying to imagine how fair that would be in a trial. Where you can't (1) observe the person's demeanor when answering, (2) where you can't ask a quick follow up question after an unsatisfactory answer, and (3) where answers would obviously be prepared by attorneys and then signed by the whistleblower.
No court proceeding would allow that as due process for cross examination.
It shouldn't be allowed to thwart the will of the public who elected Donald Trump.

That's why they use soviet style.

okie don

snowbear37 wrote:

The whole fake impeachment scam is the dem's kind of foolishness. It's going to boil down to "opinion" and "interpretation" of a few words. There was no need for opinion or interpretation of Biden's shake-down of the Ukraine....it was clear, but the Dems/libs didn't raise and eyebrow.

Biden was guilty of extortion. eg quit investigating my son or no.money...Plain and simple and Trump wanted to see what occurred. So Trump's guilty.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

okie don wrote:

Biden was guilty of extortion. eg quit investigating my son or no.money...Plain and simple and Trump wanted to see what occurred. So Trump's guilty.

Strait forward plain truth.

waltmoreno

okie don wrote:

Biden was guilty of extortion. eg quit investigating my son or no.money...Plain and simple and Trump wanted to see what occurred. So Trump's guilty.

You've hit the nail on the head! Trump's guilty because he whupped Hillary fair and square and therefore he must be punished.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

factnotfiction wrote:

Now what do the cons want?f

We want progs like you to pack your bags and haul ass to a country that will satisfy your totalitarian world view.