glad this got done in quick step. Glad we cleared that up! And all it required was the destruction of the United States. About this website WASHINGTONPOST.COM State Department probe of...

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Glad we cleared that up! And all it required was the destruction of the United States.

About this website
WASHINGTONPOST.COM
State Department probe of Clinton emails finds no deliberate mishandling of classified information

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

permafrost wrote:

Glad we cleared that up! And all it required was the destruction of the United States.

About this website
WASHINGTONPOST.COM
State Department probe of Clinton emails finds no deliberate mishandling of classified information

I know for a fact this there was true mishandling of classified information in her emails and her "private" server. That is undeniable. What is concerning is IF the State Department has actually made this proclaimed determination.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

permafrost wrote:

Glad we cleared that up! And all it required was the destruction of the United States.

About this website
WASHINGTONPOST.COM
State Department probe of Clinton emails finds no deliberate mishandling of classified information

They'll have to go after Obama or some other Democrat - because if they can just show that someone was WORSE than Trump, he won't seem quite as ridiculous as he does now. The "phony emoluments clause", really?! Maybe it's time to talk about the phony second amendment.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

nwtk2007 wrote:

I know for a fact this there was true mishandling of classified information in her emails and her "private" server. That is undeniable. What is concerning is IF the State Department has actually made this proclaimed determination.

Those of us in America who do obey the law, gasp in amazement at how your orange thing skirts the law in full view of the world; and are also amazed at how you fume and fuss over the exoneration of Lady Hillary again and again from the false claims made by the republicans/right wingers..

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

lpnmajor wrote:

They'll have to go after Obama or some other Democrat - because if they can just show that someone was WORSE than Trump, he won't seem quite as ridiculous as he does now. The "phony emoluments clause", really?! Maybe it's time to talk about the phony second amendment.

i can not conceive of anyone worst then trump..

But of course you are correct as far as intent is concerned...LOL

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

permafrost wrote:

Those of us in America who do obey the law, gasp in amazement at how your orange thing skirts the law in full view of the world; and are also amazed at how you fume and fuss over the exoneration of Lady Hillary again and again from the false claims made by the republicans/right wingers..

How many of those "indictments" are for foreigners who have never set foot in the US nor will they ever? LOLOL! Like I have said many times, they might as well have indicted Putin himself! LOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

nwtk2007 wrote:

How many of those "indictments" are for foreigners who have never set foot in the US nor will they ever? LOLOL! Like I have said many times, they might as well have indicted Putin himself! LOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

It would be nice if we could do that.. but in the real world, I would be very happy to simply indict the co-conspirator wearing the orange spray..

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

permafrost wrote:

It would be nice if we could do that.. but in the real world, I would be very happy to simply indict the co-conspirator wearing the orange spray..

Who knows? He might send his attorneys they way some of those other Russians did! Russians love discovery.