Trump threatens to sue top Democrats Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi amid impeachment inquiry
This is so funny he pledged while still campaigning he would sue the 20 some women who accused him of sexual assault and hes never don't it!
If had a clue how our government works he would know their doing their jobs!
Lonewolf wrote:
This is so funny he pledged while still campaigning he would sue the 20 some women who accused him of sexual assault and hes never don't it!
If had a clue how our government works he would know their doing their jobs!
If you had clue, you'd be aware that the President isn't being treated with fairness
The left is the party of lies now.
What you've been brainwashed into believing is Bullbiden.
byronglimish wrote:
If you had clue, you'd be aware that the President isn't being treated with fairness
The left is the party of lies now.
What you've been brainwashed into believing is Bullbiden.
whats unfair he being investigated he will get his day in count if it ever gets to the senate then he can ask questions question witnesses what ever. but trump and ruddy already admitted guilt
Lonewolf wrote:
whats unfair he being investigated he will get his day in count if it ever gets to the senate then he can ask questions question witnesses what ever. but trump and ruddy already admitted guilt
Then why do Schitt and Pelunacy refuse to take a vote.
Lonewolf wrote:
This is so funny he pledged while still campaigning he would sue the 20 some women who accused him of sexual assault and hes never don't it!
If had a clue how our government works he would know their doing their jobs!
I think it's a great idea. In the old days if you ran your mouth the way they have you might get challenged to a duel. That way was better.
Lonewolf wrote:
whats unfair he being investigated he will get his day in count if it ever gets to the senate then he can ask questions question witnesses what ever. but trump and ruddy already admitted guilt
He should get his day in court in the House, too. In both the Nixon and Clinton impeachment proceedings, the House ran the proceedings in a fair way. Both sides could call witnesses, ask questions of those witnesses, witnesses were allowed to bring counsel, etc., etc. And, before any of these proceedings took place, the entire House voted on whether or not to go forward with impeachment, which means that ALL people had a voice, through their Representatives, on whether to even hold these hearings or not. That is precedent. That is fair. That is due process. That is not what is happening here.
Instead, Pelosi and Schiff, along with a handful of DEMS at the top of the House food chain, have declared that this "impeachment inquiry" should go forward based on second-hand evidence. And they are planning to do all of it in secret, so that only the bits and pieces of testimony that fit their narrative are leaked to the public. What they are hoping is that, with the help of the media and skewed polls, these deceptive tactics will sway public opinion enough that they can get enough votes from the entire House. This is entirely unfair and unprecedented, and they know it.
And Trump knows it, too. He already gave them a transcription of the phone call, which I am pretty sure surprised the heck out of all of them and threw a great big wrench in their plans. But they march on … an impeachment mob looking for something else … anything else … they can use to start the next big witch hunt.
Trump has said he would be happy to provide documents and allow testimony IF these proceedings are done in a fair way. All Pelosi and the rest have to do is follow precedent. But they know they can't win that way.
Lonewolf wrote:
whats unfair he being investigated he will get his day in count if it ever gets to the senate then he can ask questions question witnesses what ever. but trump and ruddy already admitted guilt
What's unfair is being subjected to all this bullsht by the Dems and media for the sake of an elite class we intend on taking out no matter what you say because they are criminals.
byronglimish wrote:
Then why do Schitt and Pelunacy refuse to take a vote.
They won't either...and they won't get their impeachment. Period.
If they do...and I kinda hope they do...they'll either lose or win...
I hope they lose but if they win Trump will declassify EVERYTHING in a
televised Senate trial!
Part of me wants the Senate trial...am I
bad?
byronglimish wrote:
Then why do Schitt and Pelunacy refuse to take a vote.
they never have to vote they can just send it to the senate
Lonewolf wrote:
they never have to vote they can just send it to the senate
Wrong, they have to impeach for it to go to the Senate. That takes a vote.
I think a Trump-owned winery in San Francisco makes a lot of sense.
Take the money from Schiffs lawsuit and do a "redistribution of his wealth" to the homeless people in his great state of California.
BigMike wrote:
They won't either...and they won't get their impeachment. Period.
If they do...and I kinda hope they do...they'll either lose or win...
I hope they lose but if they win Trump will declassify EVERYTHING in a
televised Senate trial!
Part of me wants the Senate trial...am I
bad? I don't think that's bad at all. It's about time to get it on!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.