One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Sound Familiar??
Oct 9, 2019 13:15:12   #
Auntie Dee
 
Seems I've heard this verse before!



Reply
Oct 9, 2019 13:21:27   #
Carol Kelly
 
Auntie Dee wrote:
Seems I've heard this verse before!


She is a dumb broad isn’t she and it appears she’s over her head letting Schiff take the lead. He needs to be taken down.

Reply
Oct 9, 2019 13:22:22   #
CarryOn
 
Auntie Dee wrote:
Seems I've heard this verse before!


Perfectly put!

Reply
 
 
Oct 9, 2019 13:25:55   #
Kevyn
 
Auntie Dee wrote:
Seems I've heard this verse before!


Ten counts of obstruction of justice, extortion of a foreign government, racketeering, and blatant violations of the emoluments clause are a damn good start. Now it is time to start digging into his finances.

Reply
Oct 9, 2019 13:32:46   #
Lonewolf
 
Kevyn wrote:
Ten counts of obstruction of justice, extortion of a foreign government, racketeering, and blatant violations of the emoluments clause are a damn good start. Now it is time to start digging into his finances.



Reply
Oct 9, 2019 13:38:05   #
Auntie Dee
 
Kevyn wrote:
Ten counts of obstruction of justice, extortion of a foreign government, racketeering, and blatant violations of the emoluments clause are a damn good start. Now it is time to start digging into his finances.


10 possible counts of obstruction; alleged extortion, racketeering??, accusations of violations of emoluments clause.

Really Kevy when are you going to learn what is & isn't reality? Stating something just doesn't make it FACT! Something you Dem's just do not seem to understand is that you have to have proof and a legal process called a conviction! Accusations just don't do it anymore, we are onto your games!

Reply
Oct 9, 2019 14:46:05   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Kevyn wrote:
Ten counts of obstruction of justice, extortion of a foreign government, racketeering, and blatant violations of the emoluments clause are a damn good start. Now it is time to start digging into his finances.


I'll bet you can just list them here, can't you? With proof. Without proof, I could just as easily accuse you of the same thing and it would be just as valid.

Reply
 
 
Oct 10, 2019 06:16:19   #
Tug484
 
Auntie Dee wrote:
Seems I've heard this verse before!


She's starting to look like the crypt keeper.

Reply
Oct 10, 2019 12:08:15   #
Fit2BTied Loc: Texas
 
Auntie Dee wrote:
10 possible counts of obstruction; alleged extortion, racketeering??, accusations of violations of emoluments clause.

Really Kevy when are you going to learn what is & isn't reality? Stating something just doesn't make it FACT! Something you Dem's just do not seem to understand is that you have to have proof and a legal process called a conviction! Accusations just don't do it anymore, we are onto your games!
You were being a bit too solicitous, Aunti Dee.

- 10 possible counts of obstruction, which, if there was any validity to any of them, would be what the left would be investigating instead of a phone-call to Ukraine.
- Alleged extortion, juxtaposed to in-your-face, on tape, actual evidence of extortion by Creepy Uncle Joe
- Racketeering or the Emoluments Clause? Compared to the Clinton Foundations taking in hundreds of millions from foreign countries...

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/04/hillary_and_the_emoluments_clause_of_the_constitution.html
"Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as “other expenses.” Official IRS forms do not list cigar or dry-cleaning expenses as a specific line item. The Clinton Foundation may well be saving lives, but it seems odd that the costs of so many life-saving activities would be classified by the organization itself as just random, miscellaneous expenses."

Just sayin'

Reply
Oct 10, 2019 17:42:39   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
I'll bet you can just list them here, can't you? With proof. Without proof, I could just as easily accuse you of the same thing and it would be just as valid.


I haven't seen any of them. If he means trying to get a country to look into something for him. Zelensky ran on a get rid of corruption ticket and believe me Burisma is only the tip of the iceberg. But then, explain Tony Blair and Slick Willy, yes it is documented. Or the treaty of cooperation between the US and Ukraine Willy signed.

Reply
Oct 11, 2019 16:06:27   #
herbie
 
Auntie Dee wrote:
10 possible counts of obstruction; alleged extortion, racketeering??, accusations of violations of emoluments clause.

Really Kevy when are you going to learn what is & isn't reality? Stating something just doesn't make it FACT! Something you Dem's just do not seem to understand is that you have to have proof and a legal process called a conviction! Accusations just don't do it anymore, we are onto your games!


and what makes you right and Kevyn wrong ?

Reply
 
 
Oct 22, 2019 11:16:30   #
promilitary
 
Kevyn wrote:
Ten counts of obstruction of justice, extortion of a foreign government, racketeering, and blatant violations of the emoluments clause are a damn good start. Now it is time to start digging into his finances.





None of which have any factual backup.
Unless we take the word of Shifty Schiff

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.