jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

But Biden is lol

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

WRONG!!!!..Tax cuts helped a lot of people,including me,my family and friends...You are blinded by hate for this President.....And this will hurt you Rats in 2020!!!..RED WAVE 2020!!!

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

NOPE..He is done!!!!

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

and so is TRUMP

Iliamna1

Between the easily available video of Biden boasting how he strong-armed the Ukranian president to fire the prosecutor who was investigating his son, or they wouldn't get the 1 B-B-Billion US tax dollars so his son could get 3 million and all the videos of Biden groping women AND little girls, his campaign is sunk. No one even has to debate whose policies are better for us or not, just the LIVE videos sink his candidacy.
His goose is cooked.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Trump will be reelected again in 2020!!!

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia

I don't agree with Soros, true the Labour Unions are now Gov or protected industries employees and have lost the plot, but that opposition you think is united is part of Trump's wavering supporters who actually in 2016 they were strong Trump MAGA, but now see Trump as a failure, and want to bail before it's too late.

The Commercial Banks in order to sabotarged Trump all they have to do is ratchet up overnight borrowing no matter what, Trump supporters are very well aware of the situation which is why Fed Chair Jay Powell is injecting all this new issue currency, once $ are issued they can't be unissued except by inflation, this is type of injection at these levels is unheard of, never before has it happened, and it's much greater than QE ever was.

Again I repeat, this is unprecedented, in 2008 there was only minor Fed incursions into the overnight market, although when Australia was doing fine a bit after 2009 because of "trade with China", made possible because China retained the only credible currency because it wasn't floating, the US Commercial Banks pushed overnight borrowing for Australian Banks way up to cause a problum for Australian dealings with China, who were being approached by IMF officials to make massive investments in the Fund which China did and was accepted into the IMF's Special Drawing Rights currency Basket of 5 influential fiat currencies in March 2015, the IMF even suggesting in 2012 partnership with the US operations in the IMF and World Bank.

This was badly upsetting the Bankers, so they attacked Australia because they weren't game to attack China then, now behind Trump the do attack China but many are thinking about giving up, that's how come I know about this Bankers tactict.

However Trump's strategy, reluctantly implemented by Powell, is not fool proof, sure the Banks won't be able to ratchet up overnight lending but they will be able to pay into the Repo Money Pool using worthless collateral and recover it years laterwhile extracting $ and filtering them through real "inter bank giving", the Regulators will say nothing because that would undermine credibility probably worse the soaring borrowing costs.

If Trump wins the the Trade War and Sanction strategy, two things will change Trump will be the first ever World Leader and the $ will be " pegged against" by 194 other Nations.

This is the reason Trump"s camp is suffering desetions at the highest level, all he has to do is flip flop, but then he might lose even more credibility, there is no answer that can come from mere mortals.

Fortunately I am connected to Extraterrestrials but am forbidden to divulge information except under rewarding circumstances.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

89%-90% of Trump supporters still support him..And we will till the end!!!!

RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia

That could be delusional, Hillary thought the same thing, depends on who the Dems come up with, I think, Democrats think that the people want another alternative, if the people didn't want another radical alternative like Reagan, Obama and Trump, then Mike Pence would be promoted by the Republicans as the stable face of the Party, but stability is not what people want, they want an alternative to the status quo not more of the same.

US has to change direction, most people think that, Trump is not tied to anyone and can get away with rolling around the deck making changes without any ropes holding him down, people like that, but the Dems can offer more stable radical alternatives.

Ron Paul Liberty Report has been tracking this public attitude since 2016 and has noticeably moved further away from their previous policy promotions due to this public opinion, check out his latest show "Impeachment Hysteria! But Who's Guilty, Trump or Biden" in 3 hours 770 views.

bahmer

Amen and Amen

Radiance3

====================
You believe that president Trump is a failure because your also believe that countries do not like what president Trump has been doing. That countries are deserting him. Wrong. US is now respected because of president Trump.

After president Reagan in 1989, no one had faithfully served the American people faithfully, but they focused to their own political ambitions. The abuses of China over the United States had been ignored and neglected. They focus on their self-interest keeping their power.

That neglect allowed China taking advantage over the US trade imbalance, and at the same time stealing the US Intellectual Properties. Perhaps those presidents did not want conflicts, or perhaps because of ignorance how economy works, they didn't realize that China had been materially taking advantage of the US. As a result, that enabled China to rapidly advance on its economy over the US and above every country in the world. China had enriched against the US in trillions of dollars during those years before president Trump.

When president Trump came in, he noticed the problems. If US continue allowing China taking advantage over its trade business, and allowing to continue stealing US intellectual properties, the end results could be US economic failures that could never be restored.

But he dared put up a solution to correct the trade imbalance, and the intellectual property thievery. The only way to correct that was the tariffs imposition on China's exports to the US. Effects: US consumers could be paying a little more, but the tariffs go to the US Treasury anyways.

The China problems have gone so huge, and precisely correcting the problems require time, risks, and a lot of patience and works to be done.

President Trump has created the lowest unemployment since 59 years ago. Blacks, Hispanics, and women have the lowest unemployment since history. Wages have gone up at least 3.5% to 5%. President Trump has corrected the illegal immigration that has been abused to much our sovereign rights. That is why you conclude that countries don't like president Trump. I don't care, but those countries illegally violating our own. What I care is the welfare of the American people and our safety. That is what the president is doing. No more Muslims please!!

The whole world economy is slowing down including China. It is possible that US could be affected. But at present US is more stable than other countries.
You are blaming that the US banks are slowing and the Federal system has been pumping amount of cash to restore its liquidity. We know that banks have cash reserves at the Federal system to protect the peoples' money in case of insolvency.

The Federal system pumps its liquid assets to banks, but that has been a normal process when the banks get more repos. It is a solution to restore its operating capacity. Except the effects could trigger higher interest rates. Banks have to do that to restrain inflation.

I believe you hate president Trump and all your negative critics are focused on him, but ignored the travesties and failures of Obama. Having that kind of biased support for Obama, won't persuade me. For I know that Mr. Obama had lots of more failures and destruction made during his tenure which left marks of his footprints all over his failed policies.

. China is a very clever country. It has been expanding all over the world for dominance, and even the islands in the Pacific that don't belong to China have been taken and made strategic defense against any country that could interfere its global ambitions.

President Trump is working for the American people. Unfortunately, you dislike him, discredit him for all the achievements he does for the American people. He has no self-interest but his attention is to serve the American people. Unlike the prior presidents whose ambitions were all focused to elevate their position of power and greed.

Notice that the democrats in Congress since January have focused on the impeachment of president Trump. Taxpayers pay them so much salaries and benefits, but all they do is political ambitions for their own. That itself is a constitutional violation.

President Reagan was an exception. He was one of the greatest presidents.
Thank you.

RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia

I never said Trump was a failure, I said he's able to be played by both sides, so Trump can't be a failure, that's impossible one side definitely will but Trump won't be on it, Trump will be looking good when the end is nigh.

Nigh means incredibly difficult to accomplish.

Political ambitions was all what Trump's speech at the General Assembly yesterday was about, so Trump is unconstitutional according to you, if I was proud republican I'd put you on an ignore list, but I'm not so I will address your concerns about inflation which hasn't happened this century because Reagan tilted the field so all benefits trickle to the lowest order, bankers real-estate dealers, or Capital Gains going down on interest rates. Only hope no ladies read that one, I haven't been the same since I watched Trump's speech.

Do you think pundits are going over the top when they say it was the best ode to the Universal Soldier never written just popped up out of thin hair.

Your easily taken in, I guess your too young to remember Donovan, his rendition of Universal Soldier was great, I didn't realise just how old I was since I watched Trump's speech, I've been lying down ever since I don't even really feel like breathing, maybe I'm dying, that surely was a powerful speech, if I die on proud republicans thread do you think she will honour me, maybe Donovan can come sing at my funeral, I went to see him when he came to Sydney 1970 I remember asking, when is the show going to start, never got a reply and never found out but I sat through it all , Trump was at the wrong venue same as me.

Radiance3

================
I have so much questions on all your initial assertions that commercial banks could sabotage Trump via a ratchet overnight borrowing as Jay Powell the Fed Chair has been injecting too much currency into the market.

Your assumptions I believe is wrong considering that i don't see any evidence of proof where you've taken the issue. Powell is not over the president and his actions when wrong could trigger the economic failures which the president tries to avoid. In addition, your report was obtained via the Washington Post which has not objective but to provide fake news reporting, and I don't trust that outlet.

You've dismissed the fact that the 2008 Sub Prime failures were the most devastating event in the US economy. About $2 trillion dollars were lost . The Federal Reserve and its decision making body the FOMC (Federal Open Marker Committee) were slow in providing solutions due to the complexities of the problems. But finally later on Congress designed an act to issue initial amount of $720 billion for 91.5 % for the 3 fiscal years. These were the $189 billion for 2009, $400 billion in 2010, and $135 billion on 2011.

All these under the administration of Obama, and I was not sure if they were all properly used to the intended purpose. Additional funding was added later to reach total amount to $865 billion, money I did not see how it was allocated to the projects intended purpose. For I am aware so much was diverted to areas not useful to stimulate the economy. I wrote this because you've ignored the gravity of the problems.

Another concern I have is how president Trump got involved in your assertions about the Australian economy along with that of China. Those events I believe happened prior to his administration. You did not provide source of your information. Your theories and speculations, in which I have no basis to depend on.

This second reply was written because of the other unanswered questions bothering me. Your imaginations being not consistent is unreliable. Good night.

RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia

Sorry; I didn think you were serious, the $2 trillion wasn't lost because it was wasn't there to begin with, the $2 trillion wasn't anything to do with those sub prime mortgages that triggered the run on the banks the sub prime mortgages were genuine commitments by home owners who signed up without much of a deposit.

The $2 trillion was speculative asset adjustments of value which first took hold in the futures markets that all turned bearish, and then that contagion spread to all equities and property markets, and after that then resulted the original home owners who has signed up for a debt found that the value of their property was much less than the amount owed by them on the mortgage.

Some banks were given bail out money and Congress was involved but the Fed has authority to inject funds where necessary with the oversight of the Treasury Dept I think the figures you drew our attention to were to begin the nascent process of Quantative Easing, the Fed has never been audited so how much they give out and get back is always only ever conjecture.

The mortgages that ended up oversees as bundles were not bad debts until the banks started to fight each other and that was when Obama arrived a couple of year's later the repco market were one of the first signs that the Banks were digging into survival trenches, but last weeks injection were 10 times bigger sums of $ needed to prop up the inter bank over night lending market than was needed in 2008, officially the story is as you point out something to do with companies borrowing to pay taxes, well see.

The sub prime mortgages were Bushes bright idea to consolidate support for the invasion of Iraq, almost identical to Modern Monetary Theory just pust the $ out there as fast as possible.

Bank employees got a bonus for every mortgage they sold the builders got work people who otherwise couldn't afford homes were set for life, but property values plummeted when Obama came to Office.

Obama was a charismatic leader like Trump both above party politics so the deep State Henry Kissinger didn't have as much authority over the Government because of the charisma of the President.

The deep State controls the Party machine at branch level and when there is no charismatic leader, the deep State control everything that's why they call it deep.

If McCain and Palin would have won 2008 all hell would for sure have broken loose WW 3.

It's the Party machine that Powell will respond to because his home base is the branch banks same as a lack luster President is always threatened by the rank and file unless he has something over them, it all becomes very local grass roots family against family when there is no ultimate authority.

Australian Banks got involved when the Australian Wheat Board was had-up-for violating sanctions in the wheat for oil scheme which was said to be corrupt like Huawei is now, you'd probably find Trump wasn't responsible for that.

The Australian Wheat Board was smashed out of existence and became a private company owned by the growers in 1999, but now is much less effective especially in times of drought. .

The reason Australian banks were set upon by US deep State is because they didn't like us being strong and healthy so the Over Night Lending Rate was used to create liquidity problems for us by pushing up over night interst rates, that was Obama you're right to deduce that it was his Term.of Office but I'm sure he wasn't pulling the strings.

However it also happened in the Asian Financial crisis late 1990's and the one before before that was early 1990''s, I had a Government protected mortgage so was OK but 2 work mates were on the open market their interest rate went from 6% to 15% one had to sell up.

Australian Banks balance their day to day ledgers using the US banking overnight market.