2bltap wrote:
I have truly tried to understand why the progressive left are so angry that an outsider like President Trump won the 2016 election? Prior to that they all wanted to either be him or like him. The music and acting communities were in all in love with him. Famous rappers like snoop dog and many many more were all about him and how cool he was/is. So what is the real reason that they are so pissed off about. I have yet to understand. The only plausible thing that I have read about this phenomenon is that as soon as he decided to run on the Republican ticket all of a sudden all of the money he had donated to both parties as well his phylanthropy (spelling?) endeavors to all of these organizations all of the good things he did for them and then they can't stand him. Can anyone here please help me to understand? I would really appreciate it very much!!!!!
I have truly tried to understand why the progressi... (
show quote)
I never imagined Trump as a philanthropist, only ever saw his input to our human subjective discernment as an input from out there somewhere, which is what most people also saw Obama and Reagan as, or so I imagine.
This Trump phenomena is not a one-off, Trump is not one-out standing by himself, Trump is a reoccurring theme representing the psychological ethos of the US social agreement, John Dewey's summary ascribed it as a Darwinian Pragmatism, itself encapsulated by wild west synergy. (John Dewey America's most popular Philosopher 1859 - 1952).
There are three types of discernment spiritual, subjective and objective.
Spiritual discernment is a conditional reasoning, heart to heart, subjective discernment is intuitive, and objective discernment is logical.
No rational humans believed Trump Obama or Reagan was the Starman so that counted spiritual out, also because I am the Starman, anyhow again also, none of the three were logical so that eliminated objective discernment leaving only subjective discernment as a bipartisan proposition for most Americans to factor Trump Obama and Reagan into reality.
Maybe we should consider what reality is before delving deeper into this conundrum, here we go, wrap your head around this if you're up for an intellectual challenge..
The Institute of Art and Ideas - Donald Hoffman | Full Interview | The Case Against Reality. (iai).
The scientific problumm Trump Obama and Reagan represents is more to do with consciousness than reality, which explains why they all lost touch, consciousness is the most elusive contemporary scientific inquiry.
A small fortune is on offer for anyone who can answer the question "what is consciousness" not only will that correct conclusion explain what Trump is about and why he dropped off, it will hitherto, maybe, answer as David Hoffman asks why is the taste of vanilla caused by our nurerological system ? Hoffman mentioned this vanilla aspect 11 minutes into the interview.
This perplexing question is the most pressing scientific black hole needing a Theory, usually the question goes along the lines of why does a rose smell the way that it does, I think it's similar to asking, - political ring-ins, - where do they come from, where do they go too.
Here's my contention.
Consciousness is a databased structure that we create as a survival tool similar to stone axes, agreement on what we perceive becoming the portal of convenience, refinement, security, comfort and allurements, causing agreement to be a blunt object smashing up against the continuum of randomised probabilities effecting cognitive refinements to validate pre-existing rudiments adding to validities agreed upon in the past.
Idealism couldn't be used to describe what Trump Obama and Reagan represent politically, but Idealism is what consciousness is, Philosophy had the answer long before science was invented and the Trump phenomenon is a thing of the past if he can't adapt his version of the wild west to international discernment in a hurry.