One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
A&E for 9-11 Truth and UAF release 4 Yr in depth study on WTC 7 Collapse
Page 1 of 2 next>
Sep 6, 2019 07:19:36   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
While it should come as no surprise to anyone with properly functioning neurons, here is the following conclusion of the just released study:

"Fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building."
--------------------
This week, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth announced their partnership with the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in releasing a draft report of an in depth four-year study on what actually brought down WTC 7. According to the press release, the release of the draft report begins a two-month period during which the public is invited to submit comments. The final report will be published later this year.

According to the study’s authors:

The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.

https://thefreethoughtproject.com/tower-7-office-fires-study-collapse/

Now, let's hear from the brain washed masses on why this study is flawed, and just another "conspiracy theory".

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 08:32:54   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
ACP45 wrote:
While it should come as no surprise to anyone with properly functioning neurons, here is the following conclusion of the just released study:

"Fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building."
--------------------
This week, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth announced their partnership with the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in releasing a draft report of an in depth four-year study on what actually brought down WTC 7. According to the press release, the release of the draft report begins a two-month period during which the public is invited to submit comments. The final report will be published later this year.

According to the study’s authors:

The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.

https://thefreethoughtproject.com/tower-7-office-fires-study-collapse/

Now, let's hear from the brain washed masses on why this study is flawed, and just another "conspiracy theory".
While it should come as no surprise to anyone with... (show quote)


Wow! I can’t wait to now hear from some resident loons now in hiding.

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 08:55:05   #
okie don
 
Bldg#7 gave the whole thing away regarding explosives.
It's hard to believe our own gubment would do this!
Kinda like the Gulf of Tonkin episode leading to Viet Nam.

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 08:55:31   #
okie don
 
Both lies!!!!

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 10:20:12   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
okie don wrote:
Both lies!!!!


OK. Where is Whole2th and Payne 1000?? How did all those unseen minions plant those kosher explosives?
Inquiring gentiles want to know!!!

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 12:56:38   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
amadjuster wrote:
OK. Where is Whole2th and Payne 1000?? How did all those unseen minions plant those kosher explosives?
Inquiring gentiles want to know!!!


Once you accept the fire that fire did not cause building 7 to collapse at near free fall speed (and by implication the other two towers), and that there "was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building", what does that mean to you?

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 13:24:52   #
okie don
 
BBC already broadcast it's collapse before it came down.
DUH...

Reply
Sep 6, 2019 14:30:18   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
ACP45 wrote:
Once you accept the fire that fire did not cause building 7 to collapse at near free fall speed (and by implication the other two towers), and that there "was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building", what does that mean to you?
Means nothing, because none of this is true. UAF published this bullshit over a year ago, it didn't sell then, it isn't going to sell now.

Accurate Collapse History of WTC7

Reply
Sep 7, 2019 11:19:00   #
Radiance3
 
ACP45 wrote:
While it should come as no surprise to anyone with properly functioning neurons, here is the following conclusion of the just released study:

"Fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building."
--------------------
This week, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth announced their partnership with the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in releasing a draft report of an in depth four-year study on what actually brought down WTC 7. According to the press release, the release of the draft report begins a two-month period during which the public is invited to submit comments. The final report will be published later this year.

According to the study’s authors:

The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.

https://thefreethoughtproject.com/tower-7-office-fires-study-collapse/

Now, let's hear fromThi the brain washed masses on why this study is flawed, and just another "conspiracy theory".
While it should come as no surprise to anyone with... (show quote)

================
These mystical events are so confusing to fathom. Only God actually knows what exactly happened. Scientists seem to bring most compelling evidence based on science and physics theories. Their comprehensive studies appear very credible and compelling. But on the other hand, other theories also compound and complicate my lost thoughts and emotion which way to believe.

I watched the whole events unfold when both buildings were burning at the World Trade Center in NYC on 9/11. About 6:20 AM, I was leaving for office early that morning for a project report fo finalize. I turned on the TV to check the traffic. What I saw was a plane rapidly approaching the 2nd tower as the first one was already on flame. The impact of the plane suddenly burst the 2nd building into explosions. It was rapid. Immediately, I called my nephew in NYC, whose office was in one of the towers at the 11th floor.

Fortunately, he was still on his way to his office, not aware what was going on. So, he escaped the tragedy. That was about 9:20 AM East Coast time, 6:20 here at the West Coast. I did not proceed to office that time. I was so confused and nervous what was happening. I watched the whole events that whole day. I can't hold myself but cried.

Then on 2017, I had a debate with another OPP contributor. I think he was a civil engineer, insisted a conspiracy theory I thought. But he insisted that the Towers were purposely brought down using a controlled demolition substance. I did not believe. We continued debating for several weeks, and ended with no resolution but agreed to disagree with each other. I got tired.

So now, what was really the cause of these series of buildings burning at the same time? So much sufferings of almost 2,997 people and their families, plus those who were affected by the toxic substance now clinging to their lives.

If this was on purpose what kind of human being could that be? That must be the most evil of all living things on earth. I can't understand but pray because only God really knows what happened.

Justifications of scientists seem very credible. But the other way was also credible. So, ladies and gentlemen, which way do you believe?

Reply
Sep 7, 2019 20:38:47   #
Tug484
 
ACP45 wrote:
While it should come as no surprise to anyone with properly functioning neurons, here is the following conclusion of the just released study:

"Fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building."
--------------------
This week, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth announced their partnership with the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in releasing a draft report of an in depth four-year study on what actually brought down WTC 7. According to the press release, the release of the draft report begins a two-month period during which the public is invited to submit comments. The final report will be published later this year.

According to the study’s authors:

The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.

https://thefreethoughtproject.com/tower-7-office-fires-study-collapse/

Now, let's hear from the brain washed masses on why this study is flawed, and just another "conspiracy theory".
While it should come as no surprise to anyone with... (show quote)

Even a janitor that survived heard blasts inside before the "plane" ever hit.

Reply
Sep 8, 2019 06:21:00   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Means nothing, because none of this is true. UAF published this bullshit over a year ago, it didn't sell then, it isn't going to sell now.

Accurate Collapse History of WTC7


If you choose to believe that bullshit Blade, that is your choice. After all, why listen to a bunch of architects and engineers, what the hell do they know. It does not take a giant leap of logic to realize that 3 steel and concrete buildings (one of which was not even hit by a plane) do not fall at near free fall speed, and collapse within it's own footprint. Fire was not the cause, something else was - plain and simple.

Reply
Sep 8, 2019 06:37:00   #
Tug484
 
ACP45 wrote:
If you choose to believe that bullshit Blade, that is your choice. After all, why listen to a bunch of architects and engineers, what the hell do they know. It does not take a giant leap of logic to realize that 3 steel and concrete buildings (one of which was not even hit by a plane) do not fall at near free fall speed, and collapse within it's own footprint. Fire was not the cause, something else was - plain and simple.

They imploded and there's only one explanation for that.

Reply
Sep 8, 2019 08:31:41   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
Tug484 wrote:
They imploded and there's only one explanation for that.


You and I believe it, but others require "baby steps". First, let them come to the realization that fire did not cause the collapse. Then, let them dwell on what could have caused the implosion. Only one rational explanation.

Reply
Sep 8, 2019 10:52:48   #
Radiance3
 
ACP45 wrote:
You and I believe it, but others require "baby steps". First, let them come to the realization that fire did not cause the collapse. Then, let them dwell on what could have caused the implosion. Only one rational explanation.


==================
I watched the whole day as the fire engulfed the buildings. Then following after that, one by one the structures begun to fall. That means the fire had something to do with the fall.

Reply
Sep 8, 2019 17:47:56   #
Tug484
 
ACP45 wrote:
You and I believe it, but others require "baby steps". First, let them come to the realization that fire did not cause the collapse. Then, let them dwell on what could have caused the implosion. Only one rational explanation.


People were seen painting something on the structures.
I watched a special and they were testing some steel beams.
Coated in thermite that is highly flammable.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.