byronglimish wrote:
We'll continue to garner all of the "White Privileges" available.
How did the conversation come to this?
emarine wrote:
I don't play the side game … you're all hung up on winners & losers to figure out you're being robbed of an American future ...
So how did a conversation that started with "being robbed of an American future..."
byronglimish wrote:
Which party is trying their best to give the U.S. to all comers?
Switch to "[giving] the U.S. to all comers", a standard talking point trying to make us think all our problems are due to an invasion of immigrants taking our jobs. For information countering this, see:
https://www.bushcenter.org/publications/resources-reports/reports/immigration.html?gclid=CjwKCAjwqZPrBRBnEiwAmNJsNuUx9eTZZlZcD2_sQIO9k6l-WMYgRCkbboQ_spn_OMgOK60At-HVYxoC15MQAvD_BwEemarine wrote:
The party that follows the constitution...
byronglimish wrote:
So to you the constitution gives the U.S. to any foreigner.
Still dwelling on the immigrant invasion with an undertone of some foreigners may be worse than others.
acknowledgeurma wrote:
The US Constitution puts no limits on immigration.
byronglimish wrote:
So just let anybody and everyone in..got it.
Continues on the immigrant invasion and doubling down on the undertone of some foreigners...
Here I gave some links to information about just what class (debtors, vagabonds, former soldiers, evicted peasants, ... throw-aways) many of the early settlers came from.
byronglimish wrote:
So you're another black racist or a wimp who is embarrassed of being white?
Where did this come from? Did byronglimish read or view any of the links? Is byronglimish resorting to ad hominem attacks because he can't think of a valid argument? Is byronglimish playing the "race card"? Surely not.
acknowledgeurma wrote:
Care to share your chain of logic (?) that led you to that conclusion?
Giving byronglimish the benefit of doubt, I ask him to explain his logic.
byronglimish wrote:
No chain at all, you buy into that white privilege jealousy promulgated by the racist Kenyan.
Here byronglimish admits to no logic and continues his ad hominem attacks and brings in the "white privilege jealousy" talking point.
acknowledgeurma wrote:
Ah, as I thought, no logic at all, just a spew of bile.
After a spew from others of "white people who hate being white", and "We'll stay white, and proud of it!"
byronglimish wrote:
We'll continue to garner all of the "White Privileges" available.
byronglimish ends with this, possibly with ironic intent, but maybe not.
Had byronglimish followed any of the links, he would have known that they had nothing to do with any concept of "white privilege", but rather looked at the travails of poor "white" people in America and how they were/are anything but privileged and possibly not even inside the boundaries of "whiteness".