johnsorrell7

Educate yourself a little. Hillary sold tons of it to the Russians and we are now probably buying it back f on them. Wonder what she made on that deal???

emarine

Big buddy, Trump's all about the caste system & always has been …

Radiance3

==============
Hillary got $145 million for that 20% Uranium One sold to Russia. For her corrupt foundation, only 5 % went to charity.

acknowledgeurma

The Clinton Foundation is a charity. Most of its funds go to direct programs. The 5% are grants to other charities. It's not nice for you to deceive in such a way.
https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680

Radiance3

==============
Clinton Foundation is a window dressing in the guise of a 501(c) 3 charitable organization.
Most of the money raised went to overhead expenses like salaries, travel, conference, and many others. About 95 %went to operating cost. It is a very deceptive operation in disguise of a foundation.

https://psmag.com/news/whats-going-on-with-the-clinton-foundation

https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37826098

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/clinton-foundation-donations/

kemmer

You're confusing CA with ALL of the Southern states.

kemmer

The Trump Foundation was outlawed by NY as corrupt. Trump was using it as an ATM for personal use.

acknowledgeurma

Did you even read these links?
From:
https://psmag.com/news/whats-going-on-with-the-clinton-foundation

"While it is highly inappropriate for a sitting president to call on his own Department of Justice to investigate his political opponents, Trump has nevertheless openly pushed for investigations of the Clintons while in office."

"The charges against the foundation have ranged from ridiculous to serious. Two days after the initial reports of the Trump administration's new probe, multiple conservative websites falsely claimed that 22 of the foundation's employees had been arrested. There were no arrests.

Many charges are trivial. Fox News reported that a donor to the foundation, Terrence Duffy, asked then-Secretary Clinton for help in setting up business meetings in Singapore and Hong Kong. Yet United States embassies do this routinely.

Other accusations are far more troubling. Human rights-abusing governments, including Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Oman, have donated millions to the Clinton Foundation. Saudi Arabia alone has contributed $10 million to $25 million.

Ukrainian steel magnate Victor Pinchuk also gave the foundation $10 to $25 million. And he was by many accounts not shy about asking for help from Hillary Clinton when she served as secretary of state. While there's been no indication of what the new FBI investigation is looking into, over the years these probes have usually focused on influence peddling allegedly enabled by the Clinton Foundation's fundraising."

"The foundation has made notable contributions in global health, HIV/AIDS, and women's empowerment. Perhaps its most notable success was in negotiating a significant drop in the price of drugs used to fight AIDS and then bringing those drugs to Africa, where an epidemic was ravaging the continent.

Despite the suspicions conservatives have long raised about the Clinton Foundation, Charity Navigator, a group that rates the fundraising and spending practices of non-profits, gives it high marks. The foundation spends 87 percent of what it raises on the programs it supports, a higher share than most of its peers."

Oh here's something "bad":
"I believe that the foundation's high ambitions and thirst for funds make it too open to unsavory gifts that, in turn, damage its reputation.

Foreign governments find the foundation attractive because they are limited in what they can otherwise do to improve their access and influence with American policymakers. The law prohibits their donations to American political candidates, although they may hire lobbyists.

With or without an indictment, fines, or other punishment, the Clinton Foundation's outlook will remain murky as long as its endowment remains small. Should the Clinton Foundation ultimately fold, its legacy is likely to be its fundraising practices, not its good works."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From:
https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37826098

"Jake Johnston, an analyst with the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a nonpartisan group that has studied the quake reconstruction, told the BBC "it's hard to say it's been anything other than a failure".

But he believes the State Department and IHRC simply replicated the mistakes of the whole foreign aid industry by chasing short-term gains instead of building longer-term capacity on the ground.

"They relied too much on outside actors," Mr Johnston says, "and supplanted the role of the Haitian government and domestic producers."

While the Clintons in their respective roles clearly had a say over where some of the quake relief cash flowed, their political enemies have wrongly claimed the family foundation directly controlled all the billions in funds.

The foundation itself raised a relatively modest $30m for aid projects in Haiti.

A spokeswoman for the charity told the BBC: "Every penny of the more than $30m raised was deployed on the ground, with no overhead taken by the Clinton Foundation."

----------------------------------------------------------------------
From:
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/clinton-foundation-donations/
"
Throughout all this, the Clinton's and their defenders insisted that foundation was doing great work for mankind. It was helping the poor and sick around the world. It got top ratings from charity rating agencies. They said there wasn't any hard evidence of wrongdoing."

Now here's a big shocker:
"If the Clinton Foundation was as good as defenders claimed, why did all its big-time donors suddenly lose interest? The only reasonable explanation is that donors weren't interested in what the foundation supposedly did for humanity. They were interested in the political favors they knew [sic] their money would buy."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This sounds more like an indictment of the donors than the Clintons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even though it might seem to be a bit of "what-about-ism", compare:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_J._Trump_Foundation

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Doesn't act much like it. I think you're making excuses for people who have been abusing their offices for decades and we're sick of them.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Grow up, Guido. Your biases are stinking up your red/yellow diaper.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Give it up. The Klinton Foundation will be the hag's downfall.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Outlawed in New York as corrupt? That's rich!

By who? The judge who had to resign as a perv or was it someone else in the corruptededest district in the whole corrupt state?

kemmer

Trump will be taken away by the men in white coats before anything happens to Clinton.

Lonewolf

Recently many psychiatrist and step forward very worried about the president's Behavior this crazy stuff about buying Greenland then calling the queen of Denmark nasty Hotel on and I was not for sale he's on Twitter constantly obsessing about the election no sane person would just keep digging this shut up day after day. If anyone disagrees with him he literally goes crazy like the squad they dare to stand up to him and he uses the religion family anything to destroy then and his base lapes it up!
He needs to be measured for a straitjacket

woodguru

Trump was reported to have said that idea is abzurd...the response was "exactly"