I love the comment by EPA official J. William Hirzy (6:32 mark in video), "If this stuff gets into our air it's a pollutant, if it gets into a river it's a pollutant, if it gets into a lake it's a pollutant, but if it goes right into your drinking water system, it's not a pollutant. That's amazing, there's got to be a better way.."
https://youtu.be/YjG2xjHn-50This video was made in 2012, and YouTube shows 1,145 views. What an insidious idea, convince the public that pharmaceutical grade fluoride is the same as the "toxic waste" sodium silica fluoride, and then sell it to municipalities to add to their water supply on the premise that it strengthens teeth.
Love the part, "that despite 50 years of water
07:21
fluoridation the EPA has no chronic
07:24
health studies on silica fluorides. All
07:26
safety studies on fluoride to date have
07:28
been conducted using pharmaceutical
07:30
grade sodium fluoride not industrial
07:32
grade silica fluorides"
Most developed nations, including all of Japan and 97% of western Europe, do not fluoridate their water.
http://flouridealert.org/issues/water/What does that imply?
This pitch is intelectual garbage
ACP45 wrote:
I love the comment by EPA official J. William Hirzy (6:32 mark in video), "If this stuff gets into our air it's a pollutant, if it gets into a river it's a pollutant, if it gets into a lake it's a pollutant, but if it goes right into your drinking water system, it's not a pollutant. That's amazing, there's got to be a better way.."
https://youtu.be/YjG2xjHn-50This video was made in 2012, and YouTube shows 1,145 views. What an insidious idea, convince the public that pharmaceutical grade fluoride is the same as the "toxic waste" sodium silica fluoride, and then sell it to municipalities to add to their water supply on the premise that it strengthens teeth.
Love the part, "that despite 50 years of water
07:21
fluoridation the EPA has no chronic
07:24
health studies on silica fluorides. All
07:26
safety studies on fluoride to date have
07:28
been conducted using pharmaceutical
07:30
grade sodium fluoride not industrial
07:32
grade silica fluorides"
Most developed nations, including all of Japan and 97% of western Europe, do not fluoridate their water.
http://flouridealert.org/issues/water/What does that imply?
I love the comment by EPA official J. William Hirz... (
show quote)
To me it says that those countries are full of cavities.
vernon wrote:
To me it says that those countries are full of cavities.
I lived in Germany for four years and never saw anyone with bad teeth. Went sightseeing in France, Holland, Belgium, and Switzerland and didn't see any bad or missing teeth. The ones I did see were in older people in the 70 to 80 age range. They lived through some really tough times. Starvation rations will make your teeth fall out sometimes.
ACP45 wrote:
I love the comment by EPA official J. William Hirzy (6:32 mark in video), "If this stuff gets into our air it's a pollutant, if it gets into a river it's a pollutant, if it gets into a lake it's a pollutant, but if it goes right into your drinking water system, it's not a pollutant. That's amazing, there's got to be a better way.."
https://youtu.be/YjG2xjHn-50This video was made in 2012, and YouTube shows 1,145 views. What an insidious idea, convince the public that pharmaceutical grade fluoride is the same as the "toxic waste" sodium silica fluoride, and then sell it to municipalities to add to their water supply on the premise that it strengthens teeth.
Love the part, "that despite 50 years of water
07:21
fluoridation the EPA has no chronic
07:24
health studies on silica fluorides. All
07:26
safety studies on fluoride to date have
07:28
been conducted using pharmaceutical
07:30
grade sodium fluoride not industrial
07:32
grade silica fluorides"
Most developed nations, including all of Japan and 97% of western Europe, do not fluoridate their water.
http://flouridealert.org/issues/water/What does that imply?
I love the comment by EPA official J. William Hirz... (
show quote)
It implies that Americans have better teeth than they do.
ACP45 wrote:
I love the comment by EPA official J. William Hirzy (6:32 mark in video), "If this stuff gets into our air it's a pollutant, if it gets into a river it's a pollutant, if it gets into a lake it's a pollutant, but if it goes right into your drinking water system, it's not a pollutant. That's amazing, there's got to be a better way.."
https://youtu.be/YjG2xjHn-50This video was made in 2012, and YouTube shows 1,145 views. What an insidious idea, convince the public that pharmaceutical grade fluoride is the same as the "toxic waste" sodium silica fluoride, and then sell it to municipalities to add to their water supply on the premise that it strengthens teeth.
Love the part, "that despite 50 years of water
07:21
fluoridation the EPA has no chronic
07:24
health studies on silica fluorides. All
07:26
safety studies on fluoride to date have
07:28
been conducted using pharmaceutical
07:30
grade sodium fluoride not industrial
07:32
grade silica fluorides"
Most developed nations, including all of Japan and 97% of western Europe, do not fluoridate their water.
http://flouridealert.org/issues/water/What does that imply?
I love the comment by EPA official J. William Hirz... (
show quote)
Well...fluoride never prevented tooth decay for me...and it's in toothpaste...which also didn't prevent tooth decay.
Seems unnecessary to me.
peg w wrote:
This pitch is intelectual garbage
Read the label on your favorite brand of toothpaste. It will say "Do not swallow". Why do you think that is Peg?
vernon wrote:
To me it says that those countries are full of cavities.
And to me, it means they take their health seriously and are careful what they put into their bodies.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.