One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
As gold and silver catch fire, what's happening?
Page <prev 2 of 2
Aug 7, 2019 09:55:43   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
eagleye13 wrote:
So they (the elitist insiders) are preparing for the plunge they have been designing.


anyone watching today's plunge in the metals?
Kitco.com

Reply
Aug 7, 2019 13:58:56   #
Richard Rowland
 
eagleye13 wrote:
anyone watching today's plunge in the metals?
Kitco.com


Bob Livingston's perspective on the coming
Richard, thanks for subscribing since 10/23/2015. Unsubscribe
Bob Livingston Alerts
This past week's events have sent the economic world into a tailspin. Mainstream analysts were so sure of themselves heading into the July Federal Reserve meeting. The Fed was going to cut rates by respectable margin, or they were going to cut incrementally and promise the markets through thinly veiled language that QE4 was well on the way. They did not get what they were hoping for, but I don't think many people understand why the Fed did what they did.

I have long held that the Fed has no intention of kicking the can on the economic crash that is currently underway, and that the Fed's tightening cycle was a way to restrict liquidity into economic weakness in order to trigger the collapse of the "Everything Bubble." I predicted over the past two years that the Fed would keep liquidity conditions tight until right before or right after an accelerated crash in fundamentals and markets. The crash in fundamentals has already begun in 2018 and 2019. A return to crash conditions in stock markets has also now likely started. We will have to wait and see how the next few months play out.

While I believed the central bank would hold rates steady in July, Jerome Powell's public statements after the Fed announcement of a minor .25 bps rate cut were even worse for market investors to hear and only support my original position. Powell's assertion that the cut was merely a midyear "adjustment" and not the beginning of an easing cycle horrified the investment world. Powell was telling markets quite bluntly that the punch bowl was not coming back anytime soon.

The consensus seems to be that the Fed has offered "too little too late," and I would say that this is a completely deliberate action. Frankly, there was nothing holding the Fed back from a cut of .50 bps and lavishing the financial media with images of QE heaven. Trump says he wants it, the day trading world is begging for it, and central bankers rarely shy away from more money printing. Unless, of course, the banking elites want a crash to happen in the near term, that is.

The Fed has basically admitted to America that yes, we are entering recession territory and that the recovery they have been promoting for the past several years is a fraud. At the same time, they told investors that they aren't going to do jack about it.

The Fed followed its rate adjustment "disappointment" with a large dump of assets from its balance sheet — around $36 billion total in July. With no certainty of new stimulus in the near term, and no certainty of further rate cuts this year, stocks have been pummeled, and this is a trend that is probably going to continue for many months. Of course, the banking elites have a plan, and they intend populists to help them, wittingly or unwittingly.

Que Donald Trump; like clockwork the Trump administration jumped in to distract the media and everyone else away from the Fed's actions by initiating even more surprise tariffs on China. China has now responded with a complete freeze on imports of U.S. agricultural products. Suddenly, the blame for the stock plunge is being attributed to Trump rather than the Fed. How convenient for the central bankers...

Four thoughts on the latest developments:

Trump bringing down stocks on purpose to beat the Fed into submission? This is crazytown talk...
First, I have noticed a narrative going around that Trump has expanded the trade war in a game of chicken with the Fed. His intention? To drive stock markets down in order to force the Fed to cut rates and launch new QE measures. I'm sorry, but this theory makes little sense.

Everyone used to say that Trump was putting pressure on the Chinese in order to reduce the trade deficit and create more fair conditions for U.S. goods overseas, as well as to stop technology theft. Now they are saying that Trump is only using the trade war as leverage against the Fed? Well, which one is it?

Trump has fused the success of his administration to the success of the stock market. He has been so insistent on taking credit for every stock market rally that now there is no separating the two. I have been warning about this for well over a year; Trump has made himself the perfect scapegoat for a collapse of the Everything Bubble should the globalists and their international banking partners decide to start one.

If the battle between Trump and the Fed was actually legitimate rather than staged, then why would Trump want a crash in stock markets? Going into an election year, a crash in stocks would hurt him far more than it would hurt the central bank. The Fed would only need to wait a year for Trump to be buried in the 2020 election after the economic calamity is wrapped around his neck. The same goes for the Chinese. They would only have to wait a year as well for Trump to be unseated. The only incentive for Trump to cause a market panic is if he is intentionally creating a diversion for the central bankers.

Yet, some people are desperately trying to conjure some kind of logical rational for Trump's actions as well as the Fed's actions. They won't find anything logical until they recognize that the Fed is deliberately triggering a crash and that Trump and conservatives (or populists) are meant to take the fall.

The Fed and the elites are against the trade war?
Second, Jerome Powell made it clear in his recent statements that the only reason the Fed was considering a .25 bps cut was because of Trump's trade war and the instability it might cause. Here we see the globalist narrative of the "evil populists" being built into the minds of the public. The assertion? That the crash in fundamentals (and now likely in stocks) is due to the trade war and the trade war alone. And the trade war is a product of nationalism and populism, thus, all populists are culpable for the crash. The central banks that created the massive financial bubble? They get a pass...

Beyond this, there are also some rather ridiculous mainstream reports of members of Trump's cabinet, including Mnuchin and Ross, advising him against the latest tariffs on China. Really? The same banking elites and CFR members that were all for the trade war six months ago are now against it? Again, this only makes sense if you look at it from the perspective that Trump and conservatives are supposed to take the blame for the crash while the bankers escape any scrutiny. They "tried" to warn Trump after all, but he wouldn't listen. He "went rogue." This is absurd theater designed for gullible people.

Trump doesn't do anything without the approval of the elites in his cabinet. There is no internal battle. Everything Trump does is for the benefit of the role he is playing within the globalist script.

Trump is secretly trying to bring down the U.S. economy to defeat the globalists in a game of 74D chess?
This theory stems from a subset of people within the liberty movement that would give anything to believe that a hero on a white horse is coming to fight their battles against the globalists for them; but it's simply not reality. Also, again, it makes no sense.

If Trump had detached his administration completely from the economic bubble and said "Hey, I don't take credit for the stock market boom because it's a fraud created by the Fed," only then would the above theory have any potential. If Trump said to the Fed and to the American people, "I will try to MAGA whether the Fed raises rates or cuts rates, and when the economy inevitably crashes the American people should blame the central bank," then perhaps we might consider him a heroic statesman. This is not the case.

Also, only people who do not understand how the globalist cabal functions believe that the Fed and other U.S. based structures are at the top of the pyramid of control. The globalists are global, the Fed is nothing more than a franchise and the dollar nothing more than a sacrificial mechanism that can be replaced. They have done it once in the past century and they can do it again. In fact, that is a plan they openly admit to.

As it stands, there will be unimaginable consequences for a crash within the U.S. financial system, and many people will aim their hatred at Trump and conservatives for these developments. But by that time, I expect that Trump will be long gone. Far from being a moment of triumph, it will be a moment that the global elites hope will bury sovereignty ideals for generations.

Bringing down the U.S. economy will do nothing to stop the globalist plan for "new world order" centralization and a single cashless global currency system. The truth is, the collapse of the U.S. economy is a necessary part of the economic reset that the globalists desire.

It's not over yet — the next stage is a no deal Brexit
As I predicted in March of this year, a No Deal Brexit event is the most likely outcome as it most serves the interests of globalists in pinning a crash in the U.S. and parts of Europe on populists and sovereignty activists. With the exit of Theresa May and the rise of Boris Johnson, a 'no deal' event is all but assured. The EU banking system is on the verge of a Lehman moment. Deutsche Bank is in shambles. Italy's banks are ticking time bombs. Many EU nations have national debts well above their annual GDP. It is only a matter of time before a crisis in the European Union occurs. Any person that is educated on the weaknesses of economic interdependency would tell you that this crash is the fault of no-borders globalists. But, with populists rising to a moderate extent in the U.K., Germany, France, etc., the globalists don't have to take the blame for the failure of their supranational experiment.

Actually, they can use the crash to blame nationalism and then use it as a springboard to launch a global supranational union, first economically, and then in the form of a single world government. Why else would the ECB be taking on Christine Lagarde, the most vocal proponent of the global economic reset, as chairman at this time? This is about engineered chaos. This is about a Hegelian problem, reaction, solution dynamic.

As already mentioned, the Fed has just admitted in an indirect way that there is no economic recovery, and that there will be no QE until it is too late to even stall a crisis for a short amount of time. Trump has just admitted that the trade war is not going to end in his first term as president and that it will only get much worse from here on. All that is left is for a No-Deal Brexit to send shockwaves through Europe, and maybe another shooting war (blockade of Venezuela, or Strait of Hormuz?).

Understanding the deeper objectives of the globalists can help us to prevent them from succeeding. At the very least, it helps us to avoid being duped into helping them. At any rate, the rest of this year is surely going to lead to what they call "interesting times."

To truth and knowledge,
crash.

Reply
Aug 7, 2019 14:09:50   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
eagleye13 wrote:
As gold and silver catch fire, what's happening?
https://www.goldmoney.com/research/goldmoney-insights/the-reasoning-behind-gold-s-breakout

A friend who has not been paying close attention to the gold market for a while asked your secretary/treasurer this afternoon for a summary of his outlook. With the monetary metals on fire tonight as they have not been for a long, long time, maybe the reply is worth sharing:

1) The gold market has felt very different for months -- felt much stronger.

2) The usual central bank-instigated smashdowns, which used to depress the price for weeks or months, now are failing to keep the price down for more than a day or two.

3) The New York Commodities Exchange's gold market has been operating very differently, with most contracts seeking delivery converted into a formerly rarely used mechanism called "exchange for physicals" whereby they are settled somewhere off the exchange, apparently in London. Until recently this mechanism was said to be used only in emergencies. Now it seems to be settling most Comex gold contracts. The implication is that there is little or no gold available immediately in Comex vaults. Whatever it means, there is a huge change here.
4) The "exchanges for physicals" seem to be rolled over in London every two weeks to escape ordinary reporting requirements. This implies that the sellers are trying to hide something. Of course that the major powers in the gold market are trying to hide things is not new, but that they are using new mechanisms of concealment is new.

5) Of course central banks, if you believe their announcements, have turned into big net buyers of gold in the last couple of years and have let the European Central Bank's longstanding gold sale agreements lapse. That is, central banks are not selling much if any gold anymore, and sales and leases of central bank gold long have provided a big part of supply.

6) The Bank for International Settlements is the major broker for central bank gold trades and long has been heavily involved with trading, leasing, and swapping gold and trading its derivatives. But the bank's recent monthly reports show a sharp decline in its gold trading. The implication is that the BIS, like the European central banks, is reducing its gold trading.

7) Many central bankers and President Trump himself are screaming for devaluing their currencies. Of course many European government and private-sector bonds are carrying negative interest rates, which is insane. Essentially it proclaims that government-issued money is hardly worth anything anymore, except for paying taxes.

8) But at least one sovereign, probably the United States, still has been trying to contain the gold price, while the strength in the market suggests that at least one sovereign has been acquiring whatever physical gold and silver are available. This is to be expected as the United States has been weaponizing the dollar and throwing sanctions at anyone who disagrees with U.S. policy. Lately there have been serious defections from the dollar system, and the defectors may have nowhere to go except to gold. But as much as central banks and President Trump want to devalue, they may want to devalue only against each other, not against gold, since -- if it is done gradually rather than suddenly, as in an international currency reset -- devaluing against gold risks prompting a flight out of all currencies, bonds, and equities. That is, a comprehensive market crash.

9) Ordinarily it would seem that circumstances are hugely favorable to gold and silver. But if governments lose on the market-rigging front, they can always become more openly totalitarian -- confiscating gold or outlawing private possession of monetary gold, imposing windfall profits taxes on capital gains in gold, raising royalty requirements on gold-mining companies to prohibitive levels, and so forth. So even as we all may hope for the best -- free and transparent markets, and limited and accountable government -- your secretary/treasurer's only prediction is borrowed from Orwell's "1984": "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face, forever."

To prevent that is another reason to press on in the morning.

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
CPowell@GATA.org
As gold and silver catch fire, what's happening? b... (show quote)


I have always marveled at the worth of rare rocks and minerals. To me, real worth is found in things created in unique ways. I know demand is really the driving force. Who ever has the most of it, can dump it into the world circulation and bring down the worth. Russia has this power right now with diamonds. They ahve enough stockpiled diamonds to make diamond a common rock and worthless in terms of their rarity.

And look at the dollar. Nixon took us off the gold standard so what is a dollar worth? Would it have value at all if we didn't have a big old military machine and thousands of nukes that we could use to destroy the world??

Now oil, that is a valuable commodity! We all need it and we all use it, but is it worth more than food?

I had a point I was going to make but just now, my liver metabolized the last of the caffeine in my system and I can't follow my train of thought. But that brings me to another item. Is there anything more valuable than chemicals; namely medicines, drugs and alcohol. But where was I going with this. I'll need a beer to figure out this one!

Reply
 
 
Aug 7, 2019 18:06:25   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
I have always marveled at the worth of rare rocks and minerals. To me, real worth is found in things created in unique ways. I know demand is really the driving force. Who ever has the most of it, can dump it into the world circulation and bring down the worth. Russia has this power right now with diamonds. They ahve enough stockpiled diamonds to make diamond a common rock and worthless in terms of their rarity.

And look at the dollar. Nixon took us off the gold standard so what is a dollar worth? Would it have value at all if we didn't have a big old military machine and thousands of nukes that we could use to destroy the world??

Now oil, that is a valuable commodity! We all need it and we all use it, but is it worth more than food?

I had a point I was going to make but just now, my liver metabolized the last of the caffeine in my system and I can't follow my train of thought. But that brings me to another item. Is there anything more valuable than chemicals; namely medicines, drugs and alcohol. But where was I going with this. I'll need a beer to figure out this one!
I have always marveled at the worth of rare rocks ... (show quote)


For one thing. Gold and Silver is a hedge against paper.
Always manipulated to the down side, by those that want it all.

Reply
Aug 7, 2019 21:34:26   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
eagleye13 wrote:
For one thing. Gold and Silver is a hedge against paper.
Always manipulated to the down side, by those that want it all.


It's just weird it has global value.

Reply
Aug 7, 2019 21:53:22   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
It's just weird it has global value.


Bankers have a great business model
Create "money" out of thin air, and charge interest.

Reply
Aug 8, 2019 14:30:00   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Bankers have a great business model
Create "money" out of thin air, and charge interest.


You're right!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.