One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Let's make one thing clear
Page <<first <prev 6 of 15 next> last>>
Jul 26, 2019 22:53:51   #
Lonewolf
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Trump supporters are too stupid to understand



Reply
Jul 26, 2019 22:57:46   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
I probably won't, but it will be a challenge to insult people politely.


I say that should be fun for us then.

Reply
Jul 26, 2019 22:57:50   #
Seth
 
Lonewolf wrote:


Yep, Dumb & Dumber.

Reply
 
 
Jul 26, 2019 22:59:00   #
Lonewolf
 
cbpat1 wrote:
That’s because you can’t interview a dead witness.


No that's because your the one's doing the real witch hunt and tray gowedy pissed away 25 million and got nothing and when we found out he never had anything to begin with and you let it slide

Reply
Jul 27, 2019 00:25:45   #
Nickolai
 
maximus wrote:
This IS the rule of law...presumed innocence until PROVEN guilty. No court exonerates a defendant...they either prove guilt or no guilt. Mueller was hired to find guilt and he found none. By the rule of law that you are worried about, Trump remains innocent by lack of any evidence. So, not to worry, your rule of law is safe.
So, tell me...why was the DNC ( Hillary campaign) NEVER investigated for paying money to get dirt on Trump when a 2 1/2 year long 45 million dollar investigation was done on Trump for his son walking out of a meeting, spending NO money, about dirt on Hillary? I'll tell you now that you can't answer that question without some kind of fairy tale conclusion.
This IS the rule of law...presumed innocence until... (show quote)





He found plenty for obstruction and could not find enough for collusion although there were over 100 contacts between trump campaign officials and Russian agents to me that's enough to call it collusion

Reply
Jul 27, 2019 00:28:40   #
Nickolai
 
maximus wrote:
This IS the rule of law...presumed innocence until PROVEN guilty. No court exonerates a defendant...they either prove guilt or no guilt. Mueller was hired to find guilt and he found none. By the rule of law that you are worried about, Trump remains innocent by lack of any evidence. So, not to worry, your rule of law is safe.
So, tell me...why was the DNC ( Hillary campaign) NEVER investigated for paying money to get dirt on Trump when a 2 1/2 year long 45 million dollar investigation was done on Trump for his son walking out of a meeting, spending NO money, about dirt on Hillary? I'll tell you now that you can't answer that question without some kind of fairy tale conclusion.
This IS the rule of law...presumed innocence until... (show quote)





Mueller is was not a court, In other words Mueller could not based on the evidence declare Trump not guilty

Reply
Jul 27, 2019 00:53:14   #
EmilyD
 
Lonewolf wrote:
When I refer to trump and the Republican party as Hitler or hitters party I do so knowing full well I'm giving Hitler a bad name!


Why do you capitalize "Hitler" and use lower case for "trump"?

Reply
 
 
Jul 27, 2019 01:02:37   #
Seth
 
Nickolai wrote:
Mueller is was not a court, In other words Mueller could not based on the evidence declare Trump not guilty


It is not a special counsel's job to declare anybody guilty or not guilty. It is his job to determine whether or not there is sufficient evidence to warrant criminal charges, then to send a recommendation to the appropriate prosecutorial authority.

Since only a complete idiot could possibly believe Mueller & Co's "mission" wasn't specifically to find that evidence against President Trump, the fact that he couldn't and didn't should be "end of story."

Mueller added a caveat that was not "within his purview" to add, that of being unable to exonerate the president, blah, blah... The only reason that was added was essentially for lip service to the Democrats he had "let down," also to allow them a glimmer of hope that there were still avenues they could pursue.

Also, he could have submitted that report months earlier but he intentionally waited until after the midterm elections to give the Democratic Party an edge -- hence, they won the House majority based largely on the false premise that intense revelations condemning the POTUS would be part and parcel of his report.

Had there not been obvious political factors involved, Mueller's little "caveats" would have been branded by any neutral prosecutor or investigator as shoddy workmanship.

I find it very difficult to credit anyone who can't see the above for what it is as possessing even an iota of intelligence, unless he or she is simply blinded by left wing political partisanship or, of course, malignant Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Reply
Jul 27, 2019 01:04:51   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
archie bunker wrote:
You wanna call me stupid moldy, do it to my face like a man, or hush your mouth!!!!!

You keyboard warriors disgust me!!


More like keyboard wimps.
Limp wristed pansies.

Reply
Jul 27, 2019 01:26:48   #
EmilyD
 
Seth wrote:
It is not a special counsel's job to declare anybody guilty or not guilty. It is his job to determine whether or not there is sufficient evidence to warrant criminal charges, then to send a recommendation to the appropriate prosecutorial authority.

Since only a complete idiot could possibly believe Mueller & Co's "mission" wasn't specifically to find that evidence against President Trump, the fact that he couldn't and didn't should be "end of story."

Mueller added a caveat that was not "within his purview" to add, that of being unable to exonerate the president, blah, blah... The only reason that was added was essentially for lip service to the Democrats he had "let down," also to allow them a glimmer of hope that there were still avenues they could pursue.

Also, he could have submitted that report months earlier but he intentionally waited until after the midterm elections to give the Democratic Party an edge -- hence, they won the House majority based largely on the false premise that intense revelations condemning the POTUS would be part and parcel of his report.

Had there not been obvious political factors involved, Mueller's little "caveats" would have been branded by any neutral prosecutor or investigator as shoddy workmanship.

I find it very difficult to credit anyone who can't see the above for what it is as possessing even an iota of intelligence, unless he or she is simply blinded by left wing political partisanship or, of course, malignant Trump Derangement Syndrome.
It is not a special counsel's job to declare anybo... (show quote)


Mark my words. Dems lost this one.
As long as we keep talking about it, we keep it live. STOP talking about it. It's how they work. Imo.

Reply
Jul 27, 2019 01:27:37   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Seth wrote:
It is not a special counsel's job to declare anybody guilty or not guilty. It is his job to determine whether or not there is sufficient evidence to warrant criminal charges, then to send a recommendation to the appropriate prosecutorial authority.

Since only a complete idiot could possibly believe Mueller & Co's "mission" wasn't specifically to find that evidence against President Trump, the fact that he couldn't and didn't should be "end of story."

Mueller added a caveat that was not "within his purview" to add, that of being unable to exonerate the president, blah, blah... The only reason that was added was essentially for lip service to the Democrats he had "let down," also to allow them a glimmer of hope that there were still avenues they could pursue.

Also, he could have submitted that report months earlier but he intentionally waited until after the midterm elections to give the Democratic Party an edge -- hence, they won the House majority based largely on the false premise that intense revelations condemning the POTUS would be part and parcel of his report.

Had there not been obvious political factors involved, Mueller's little "caveats" would have been branded by any neutral prosecutor or investigator as shoddy workmanship.

I find it very difficult to credit anyone who can't see the above for what it is as possessing even an iota of intelligence, unless he or she is simply blinded by left wing political partisanship or, of course, malignant Trump Derangement Syndrome.
It is not a special counsel's job to declare anybo... (show quote)




The truth!

Reply
 
 
Jul 27, 2019 07:14:27   #
cbpat1
 
Lonewolf wrote:
No that's because your the one's doing the real witch hunt and tray gowedy pissed away 25 million and got nothing and when we found out he never had anything to begin with and you let it slide



You and your lib pals are on the wrong side of history on this my friend. Now that the democrats part in this witch hunt is being investigated, it will be fun to see how much obstruction there will be on the democrats side.

Reply
Jul 27, 2019 07:49:33   #
Cuda2020
 
Airforceone wrote:
Could not have said it better. Our country if Trump gets re-elected or not impeached the rule of law will be a thing of the past and the Trump family over Trumps next term will obtain great wealth and power. If you follow the Trump agenda it is exactly the way Putin took over Russia. That’s why he admires people like Puntin, Crown price of Saudi Arabia and North Korea Kim Jong-Un.
(GREAT PERSONAL WEALTH AND POWER IS TRUMPS MAIN AGENDA AND HE WILL LIE, CHEAT, STEAL AND IGNORE THE LAWS OF THIS COUNTRY)
Our democracy is falling and Trump and the Republican are causing it.

The whole Republican Party are now officially afraid of Trump. (TRUMP IS PUNTIN AND THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS ARE HIS COMRADES)
Could not have said it better. Our country if Trum... (show quote)


Amen and Amen

Reply
Jul 27, 2019 08:05:40   #
Cuda2020
 
maximus wrote:
This IS the rule of law...presumed innocence until PROVEN guilty. No court exonerates a defendant...they either prove guilt or no guilt. Mueller was hired to find guilt and he found none. By the rule of law that you are worried about, Trump remains innocent by lack of any evidence. So, not to worry, your rule of law is safe.
So, tell me...why was the DNC ( Hillary campaign) NEVER investigated for paying money to get dirt on Trump when a 2 1/2 year long 45 million dollar investigation was done on Trump for his son walking out of a meeting, spending NO money, about dirt on Hillary? I'll tell you now that you can't answer that question without some kind of fairy tale conclusion.
This IS the rule of law...presumed innocence until... (show quote)


Why? Because he treasonously and covertly was complicit to undermining and sabotaging our government systems which definitely includes our voting system by which he won the election... got it, Hillary did not. He covered his tracks, that is what has done his entire adult life, that is what he means when he says"I know how to play the game", that is what is meant when he says he's a wheeler-dealer, he knows how to make deals, as you should know it is always, always for his benefit first and above all, that's how parasites work. There's your answer.

OJ was found NOT Guilty also, the system is not perfect, is it, especially when it is worked as the president has done.

Reply
Jul 27, 2019 08:09:34   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Lonewolf wrote:
When I refer to trump and the Republican party as Hitler or hitters party I do so knowing full well I'm giving Hitler a bad name!


Lonewolf; You make Hitler look like a representative of the Salvation army.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 15 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.