Hadenough wrote:
Permanut,
Get off your lazy ass and go back and read. I know your comprehension is limited along with your attention span, so I only used limited syllables for you.
I am referring too his live testimony, not his report that he couldn’t remember, like you.
I know you want President Trump out of the White House, but he will always live inside your head, rent free!
Lol, you talk about diversion, yet that’s all you do.
Dem 5D mode, Disrupt, Deceive, Deny, Deflect and you’re Delusional.
Cool your jets turbo, you might pop a blood vessel in your arse and in your case that could lead to brain damage.
Go back and read.
You poor little hating troll!
Tick Tock Tick Tock TDS boom
MAGA
God Bless the USA and President Trump
Permanut, br br Get off your lazy ass and go back... (
show quote)
I think Mueller, a life long Republican and being appointed to many high and demanding positions by Republicans. Wanted to appear, above all as impartial. and never wished to damn anyone of his chosen party. not even trump.
It looked as if he was having a difficult day.. and I felt a bit of sympathy for him being put in that position..
In order to not make a verdict on the russian meddling, he had to adopt a "no indictment of a sitting president" policy. which was in keeping with a DOJ policy..
but while we will see much more details about this, these two early posted cover my expectations and the outcome as most saw it..
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/07/robert-mueller-donald-trump-unpatriotic-unethical.html?fbclid=IwAR2KarTIyIcDiUObmxS3dRl9y5e3rrDi4DRURkMpytwyPV4gGekH27no9OY&fbclid=IwAR3rUXwMYJFk9HJEGzOnRhtOVDQQ2Nn-qWN-jFmb_X-A_MZyQYfyANLh5O8Taking his final questions of the day, though, from Intel chairman and California Rep. Adam Schiff, Mueller briefly became non-noncommittal. Schiff and the other Democrats on the committee had spent two-plus hours enumerating the various ways in which the Trump campaign, while it may have stopped short of joining an illegal conspiracy, had nonetheless welcomed, celebrated, and encouraged the crimes that Russian intelligence operatives committed against his opponent, Hillary Clinton. Schiff asked Mueller, essentially, what he thought about all that—and Mueller, however monosyllabically, told him.
SCHIFF: I’d like to see if we can broaden the aperture at the end of the hearing. From your testimony today, I gather that you believe that knowingly accepting foreign assistance during a presidential campaign is an unethical thing to do.
MUELLER: And a crime.
SCHIFF: And a crime.
MUELLER: And a crime in given circumstances.
SCHIFF: And to the degree that it undermines our democracy and institutions, we can agree that it’s also unpatriotic.
MUELLER: True.
SCHIFF: And wrong.
MUELLER: True.
it followed another exchange in which Mueller, after being shown a slide of Trump’s enthusiastic comments about WikiLeaks’ publication of Democratic emails, responded that to call the president’s remarks about the stolen material “problematic” would be “an understatement”; it also took place just after Mueller told Florida Rep. Val Demings* that it would be “generally” fair to say that the president’s written answers to investigators’ questions were not entirely truthful or complete. If you cared to hear it, the message was there: After two years, Schiff was able to get Mueller to be as direct as he’s ever going to be about judging the way that Donald Trump and the people close to him conducted themselves in 2016—and we learned that the words that Mueller thinks it’s fair to use to describe that conduct are ones like unethical, criminal, unpatriotic, and simply wrong. True, indeed.
>>>>>>>>
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/07/mueller-testimony-congress-optics/594676/But the larger problem with Mueller’s case was neatly summed up in his exchange with Republican Representative Guy Reschenthaler of Pennsylvania. “You made a decision not to prosecute?” Reschenthaler asked.
“No,” Mueller replied, “we made a decision not to decide whether to prosecute or not.”
That one fundamental decision—the decision not to decide, because he believed doing so would be inherently unfair, given Justice Department guidelines barring indictment of a sitting president and Trump’s corresponding inability to have his day in court—ensured that Mueller’s testimony, like his investigation itself, wouldn’t resolve anything. And that’s far more than a matter of mere optics. It’s a built-in flaw in the basic script, one that Charlton Heston as Moses himself couldn’t counter—and one that Mueller would strenuously argue was neither his preference nor of his own making, but one that he, and the rest of us, must to learn to live with. To act on, or not.
The Navy commendation that Mueller won for his combat action in April 1969 in Vietnam noted that “although seriously wounded during the firefight, he resolutely maintained his position.” The same could be said, for better and worse, of his career-capping appearance—all right, performance—on Capitol Hill: It was much more than a mere show.