One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Well, so how did the Mueller Hearing go ?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 6 next>
Jul 25, 2019 22:08:18   #
Elmer Werth
 
I agree with the many replies that thought Mueller was an attempt to give credibility to the gang of Demo vultures attempting to frame Trump. If the pattern were to stand that it is obstruction of justice to defend against any accusation; all the criminal defense
lawyers would be in jail. Guilt must be proved, not innocence.
Elmer Werth

Reply
Jul 25, 2019 22:08:18   #
Elmer Werth
 
I agree with the many replies that thought Mueller was an attempt to give credibility to the gang of Demo vultures attempting to frame Trump. If the pattern were to stand that it is obstruction of justice to defend against any accusation; all the criminal defense
lawyers would be in jail. Guilt must be proved, not innocence.
Elmer Werth

Reply
Jul 25, 2019 22:08:18   #
Elmer Werth
 
I agree with the many replies that thought Mueller was an attempt to give credibility to the gang of Demo vultures attempting to frame Trump. If the pattern were to stand that it is obstruction of justice to defend against any accusation; all the criminal defense
lawyers would be in jail. Guilt must be proved, not innocence.
Elmer Werth

Reply
Jul 25, 2019 22:08:18   #
Elmer Werth
 
I agree with the many replies that thought Mueller was an attempt to give credibility to the gang of Demo vultures attempting to frame Trump. If the pattern were to stand that it is obstruction of justice to defend against any accusation; all the criminal defense
lawyers would be in jail. Guilt must be proved, not innocence.
Elmer Werth

Reply
Jul 25, 2019 22:25:03   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Elmer Werth wrote:
I agree with the many replies that thought Mueller was an attempt to give credibility to the gang of Demo vultures attempting to frame Trump. If the pattern were to stand that it is obstruction of justice to defend against any accusation; all the criminal defense
lawyers would be in jail. Guilt must be proved, not innocence.
Elmer Werth


LOL. I think we know you agree.

Reply
Jul 25, 2019 22:42:28   #
Iliamna1
 
JFlorio wrote:
LOL. I think we know you agree.


Writing it in capitals once would have sufficed.

Reply
Jul 25, 2019 23:51:54   #
Radiance3
 
son of witless wrote:
Perhaps old Bob was merely the figurehead of the investigation. Maybe a demented puppet.


==============
Mueller was terribly used and abused by the democrats. I think Mueller's prior close ties to Comey induced him to accept this hoax investigation. He chose Wiesman to lead the 19 Grand Jury all of whom were donors and supporters of Hillary Clinton. Some had worked for Hillary and had conflict of interest.

Mueller allowed Wiesman to put together all this saga, and Wiesman prepared the report. Thus Mueller's performance yesterday was incompetent, which lost his integrity, credibility, and respect.

He wasted his years of being a good lawyer and public servant, only to be destroyed by this almost 3 years of the fabricated hoax against president Trump, by the radical DEMS.

Due to his age and helpless appearance, my hatred turned to sympathy, despite of his wrongful alliance with the crimes of the RADICAL DEMS headed.by Obama, Hillary, and the overall DEEP STATE.

Reply
Jul 26, 2019 00:04:00   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
karpenter wrote:
HA-HAA !!

Mueller Didn't Read The Report
That He Didn't Write
That His Underlings Investigated !!

HA-HAA !!

Uh, What's Fusion GPS ??


Yeah! Wonder if Kev knows "what's Fusion GPS??"

Reply
Jul 26, 2019 00:08:16   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Radiance3 wrote:
==============
Mueller was terribly used and abused by the democrats. I think Mueller's prior close ties to Comey induced him to accept this hoax investigation. He chose Wiesman to lead the 19 Grand Jury all of whom were donors and supporters of Hillary Clinton. Some had worked for Hillary and had conflict of interest.

Mueller allowed Wiesman to put together all this saga, and Wiesman prepared the report. Thus Mueller's performance yesterday was incompetent, which lost his integrity, credibility, and respect.

He wasted his years of being a good lawyer and public servant, only to be destroyed by this almost 3 years of the fabricated hoax against president Trump, by the radical DEMS.

Due to his age and helpless appearance, my hatred turned to sympathy, despite of his wrongful alliance with the crimes of the RADICAL DEMS headed.by Obama, Hillary, and the overall DEEP STATE.
============== br b Mueller was terribly used and... (show quote)


We've endured "government by blackmail" since the Klintons absconded with all those FBI files and then let them be found in a public way as a message to Washington. "We have your secrets! You be loyal and you can do whatever you want with our blessings!"

Looks like that era is coming to a close. Thank God!!!

Reply
Jul 26, 2019 00:09:56   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
cSc61 wrote:
Blade Runner, your namesake died today. Rest in peace Rutger Hauer. A great talent that left a legacy of many great performances.
Rutger Hauer was magnificent as Roy Baty. Harrison Ford was Deckard, the Blade Runner. Tis my all time favorite SciFi movie.

But, yeah, Hauer was one of my favorites. God bless him.



Reply
Jul 26, 2019 09:08:53   #
starman722
 
Plain and simple, he did not want to be there. He said he was done, closed the case and the office. He was not versed at all on the details and did not want to let Trump off the hook. He did not know the facts and was flying by the seat if his pants...scared.

Reply
 
 
Jul 26, 2019 09:17:08   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
starman722 wrote:
Plain and simple, he did not want to be there. He said he was done, closed the case and the office. He was not versed at all on the details and did not want to let Trump off the hook. He did not know the facts and was flying by the seat if his pants...scared.


"Plain and simple, he did not want to be there. He said he was done, closed the case and the office. He was not versed at all on the details and did not want to let Trump off the hook. He did not know the facts and was flying by the seat if his pants...scared."
AND
This is what the Demons were relying on. LOLOLOL

Reply
Jul 26, 2019 09:53:29   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
eagleye13 wrote:
"Plain and simple, he did not want to be there. He said he was done, closed the case and the office. He was not versed at all on the details and did not want to let Trump off the hook. He did not know the facts and was flying by the seat if his pants...scared."
AND
This is what the Demons were relying on. LOLOLOL


Notice they moved on immediately. Now subpoenaing Ivanka and Kushner's private e-mails. What a joke this bunch is. Do the peoples work for a change What was I thinking? Like that's gonna happen

Reply
Jul 26, 2019 10:06:26   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
JFlorio wrote:
Notice they moved on immediately. Now subpoenaing Ivanka and Kushner's private e-mails. What a joke this bunch is. Do the peoples work for a change What was I thinking? Like that's gonna happen


After Mueller Debacle, Where Do Democrats Go?
https://townhall.com/columnists/patbuchanan

The Democrats who were looking to cast Robert Mueller as the star in a TV special, "The Impeachment of Donald Trump," can probably tear up the script. They're gonna be needing a new one.

For six hours Wednesday, as three cable news networks and ABC, CBS and NBC all carried live the hearings of the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, the Mueller report was thoroughly trashed.

The special counsel stood by his findings. His investigation was not a "hoax" or "witch hunt," he said. He admitted that he had found no Trump-Russia conspiracy. He denied he exonerated Trump of obstruction of justice.

All this we knew, and all of it we have heard for months.

What was new, what was dramatic, what was compelling was how the House Republicans arrived with their war paint on and ripped Mueller and his investigation to such shreds that viewers were feeling sorry for the special counsel at the end of his six hours of grilling.

The Republicans exposed him as only vaguely conversant with his own report. They revealed that he had probably not written his own statement challenging the depiction of his findings by Attorney General Bill Barr.

Mueller's staff of lawyers, Republicans showed, reads like a donors list for Hillary Clinton. The FBI contingent that started the investigation was a cabal so hateful of Trump that some had to be fired.

Republicans raised questions about the origins of the investigation, tracing it back to early 2016 when Maltese intelligence agent Joseph Mifsud leaked to a staffer of the Trump campaign, George Papadopoulos, that Russia had Clinton's emails. That and subsequent meetings have all the marks of an intel agency set-up.

CARTOONS | AF BRANCO
VIEW CARTOON
Repeatedly, Republicans brought up the dossier written by British spy Christopher Steele, who fed Russian-sourced disinformation to Clinton campaign-financed intel firm, Fusion GPS, who passed it on to the FBI, which used it as evidence to justify warrants to spy on Trump's campaign.

To many in the TV audience, this was fresh and startling stuff.

Yet Mueller's response to all such allegations was that they were outside his purview and that other agencies were looking into them.

Wednesday's hearings often proved painful to watch.

Mueller, a 74-year-old decorated Marine veteran of Vietnam and a former director of the FBI, sat mumbling his dissents as one charge after another was fired at him, his associates and his investigation.

For this disaster, the Democrats are alone to blame.

Mueller had wanted to file his report and leave it to the attorney general and Congress to act, or not act, on its contents. His job was done, and he did not want to testify publicly.

Democrats, desperate for impeachment hearings, wanted him to recite for the TV cameras every charge against the president.

What Democrats hoped would be a recital of Trump's sins, Republicans turned into an adversarial proceeding that ended Mueller's public career in a humiliating spectacle lasting a full day.

Where do Democrats go from here?

Their goal from the outset has been to persuade the nation that Trump colluded with Putin's Russia to steal the 2016 election, and that the progressives are the true patriots in seeking to impeach and remove an illegitimate president and prosecute him for acts of treason.

The Republican position is that, for all his flaws and failings, Trump won the 2016 election fairly and squarely. He is our president, and the drive to impeach and remove him is an attempted constitutional coup d'etat by a "deep state" terrified that it cannot win against him in 2020....

Reply
Jul 26, 2019 12:54:26   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Elmer Werth wrote:
I agree with the many replies that thought Mueller was an attempt to give credibility to the gang of Demo vultures attempting to frame Trump. If the pattern were to stand that it is obstruction of justice to defend against any accusation; all the criminal defense
lawyers would be in jail. Guilt must be proved, not innocence.
Elmer Werth


What Mueller Was Trying to Hide

“Special counsel Robert Mueller testified before two House committees Wednesday, and his performance requires us to look at his investigation and report in a new light,” Kimberly Strassel writes in The Wall Street Journal.

“We’ve been told it was solely about Russian electoral interference and obstruction of justice. It’s now clear it was equally about protecting the actual miscreants behind the Russia-collusion hoax. The most notable aspect of the Mueller report was always what it omitted: the origins of this mess.”

What were those origins? “Christopher Steele’s dossier was central to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s probe . . . The report ignored Mr. Steele’s paymaster, Fusion GPS, and its own ties to Russians. It also ignored Fusion’s paymaster, the Clinton campaign, and the ugly politics behind the dossier hit job.”


Nine times during Wednesday’s hearing, Robert Mueller answered that something was not in his “purview” to investigate. And each time, it was “in response to questions about the origin story of the FBI counterintelligence operation against the Trump campaign,” The Wall Street Journal editorial board writes. “Americans need to know how and why a U.S. intelligence and law-enforcement agency came to spy on a presidential campaign . . . The good news is that [Attorney General] Barr does seem determined to find the truth.”

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 6 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.