Simple question. If life doesn't begin at conception, how can a man be responsible for support of a life he didn't create because he has absolutely nothing to do with that growth within a woman since conception, which isn't life? Apparently only the woman creates this life, well after conception, and hence her soul responsibility.
Just asking. Let the wars begin.
ImLogicallyRight wrote:
Simple question. If life doesn't begin at conception, how can a man be responsible for support of a life he didn't create because he has absolutely nothing to do with that growth within a woman since conception, which isn't life? Apparently only the woman creates this life, well after conception, and hence her soul responsibility.
Just asking. Let the wars begin.
That's cowboy logic. Otherwise, why would cows need a bull? Or mares a stallion?
Like that old song says. "It takes two, Baby. It takes two: me and you."
You're looking at it from the wrong angle.
Amen and Amen now we should revisit Roe vs. Wade and reverse it and outlaw abortions.
Hear hear...
Excellent post Peewee... Hope others read this as well
bahmer wrote:
Amen and Amen now we should revisit Roe vs. Wade and reverse it and outlaw abortions.
YES!!! It was fiction from start to finish. We should not have the legal consent to murder the innocent or to murder at all.
What a bad joke, Mat Staver, another old white man demanding women do as he wants..
To show my commitment i will even show a source that is not a friend of mine..
Bet you will not let that sink in..
Re; heart beat bills...
https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/05/23/mat-staver-accidentally-admitted-the-truth-about-anti-abortion-heartbeat-bills/Someone in that bunch should have let Liberty Counsel’s Mat Staver in on the game plan since he just gave away the truth: The reason these “heartbeat bills” are passing is because they’re abortion bans under a different name. It has nothing to do with the fetus.
As for the WND article, very poor journalism.. in fact non at all.
why not simply present the questions as the were presented to the supposed Biologists??
While I am not the supporter of abortionist you will now insist I am, I do not for moment believe that Life in a human begins at fertilization..
And the lack of proper presentation in this article does nothing to change my mind..
Do it right, or don`t bother doing it..
Far better arguments can and have been made against casual abortion..
permafrost wrote:
What a bad joke, Mat Staver, another old white man demanding women do as he wants..
To show my commitment i will even show a source that is not a friend of mine..
Bet you will not let that sink in..
Re; heart beat bills...
https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/05/23/mat-staver-accidentally-admitted-the-truth-about-anti-abortion-heartbeat-bills/Someone in that bunch should have let Liberty Counsel’s Mat Staver in on the game plan since he just gave away the truth: The reason these “heartbeat bills” are passing is because they’re abortion bans under a different name. It has nothing to do with the fetus.
As for the WND article, very poor journalism.. in fact non at all.
why not simply present the questions as the were presented to the supposed Biologists??
While I am not the supporter of abortionist you will now insist I am, I do not for moment believe that Life in a human begins at fertilization..
And the lack of proper presentation in this article does nothing to change my mind..
Do it right, or don`t bother doing it..
Far better arguments can and have been made against casual abortion..
What a bad joke, Mat Staver, another old white man... (
show quote)
So according to your avatar, you're white and hate yourself. Everyone with a brain cell knows that a human begins at conception. That means two people should have an equal choice and say. But you think women get pregnant by themselves? Guess you're not for equal rights. Even when DNA proves a man isn't the father he still has to pay child support. How unequal is that? You're a little bit dumb on purpose or lying.
permafrost wrote:
What a bad joke, Mat Staver, another old white man demanding women do as he wants..
To show my commitment i will even show a source that is not a friend of mine..
Bet you will not let that sink in..
Re; heart beat bills...
https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/05/23/mat-staver-accidentally-admitted-the-truth-about-anti-abortion-heartbeat-bills/Someone in that bunch should have let Liberty Counsel’s Mat Staver in on the game plan since he just gave away the truth: The reason these “heartbeat bills” are passing is because they’re abortion bans under a different name. It has nothing to do with the fetus.
As for the WND article, very poor journalism.. in fact non at all.
why not simply present the questions as the were presented to the supposed Biologists??
While I am not the supporter of abortionist you will now insist I am, I do not for moment believe that Life in a human begins at fertilization..
And the lack of proper presentation in this article does nothing to change my mind..
Do it right, or don`t bother doing it..
Far better arguments can and have been made against casual abortion..
What a bad joke, Mat Staver, another old white man... (
show quote)
So , if I may ask, when exactly does life in a human begin ?
Peewee wrote:
So according to your avatar, you're white and hate yourself. Everyone with a brain cell knows that a human begins at conception. That means two people should have an equal choice and say. But you think women get pregnant by themselves? Guess you're not for equal rights. Even when DNA proves a man isn't the father he still has to pay child support. How unequal is that? You're a little bit dumb on purpose or lying.
peweee,,
Yes I am a white nordic prince.. no one hates me, I am loved by all.
How could anyone not love one such as I??
Humans start with the breath of live given by God..
that is very far from the point of fertilization.. the fetus can not breath until born to the world..
It is the women who makes birth possable, who carriers the fetus to the point of birth.
as the doer rather then the watcher, it is the women who makes the decision.
If she wishs the share the decision, that is also her choice..
It is the rights of the living and denial of allowing others to force her to their wishes rather then the needs of her own..
I am very much for the true rights of others..
DNA?? what are you trying to say??
I actually knew of more than one man who when the DNA proved he was not the father.. he was sent on his way and never had to pay support for one that was not his.. any thing else is injustice and a violation of the mans rights..
Is the gravity set to high for you today??
son of witless wrote:
So , if I may ask, when exactly does life in a human begin ?
wide debate on that.
Some societies believe when the baby takes its first breath on its own, then it is human as gifted by God.
Our Christian Bible has verses which support this idea..
I fall on the side that the baby must be able to live outside of Mom to be human..
But I have some conflict with just when on a time line that would be..
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.