teabag09

New Finnish Study Finds No Evidence For Man-Made Climate Change
























A new study by researchers at Turku University in Finland found that the human contribution to a rise of 0.1°C in global temperatures over the last century is just 0.01°C.

The paper, titled ‘No experimental evidence for the significant anthropogenic climate change’ was published by Jyrki Kauppinen and Pekka Malmi.

The study found that, “During the last hundred years the temperature is increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C.”

Kauppinen and Malmi conclude that global temperatures are controlled primarily by cloud cover and that “only a small part” of the increased carbon dioxide concentration is anthropogenic.



The study also calls into question the claims of the UN IPCC, which concluded that global temperatures are largely driven by human activity.

While the methods and results of the study can be debated, this once again illustrates how there is no overwhelming consensus on man-made global warming as the media often claims.

In reality, there are dozens of prominent scientists who believe that climate change is driven by natural forces or that the United Nations’ climate projections are unreliable.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

Climate change is certainly real... How much of it is caused by human activities is uncertain... I'm planning to live a long and glorious life... With plenty of great weather days

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

They "Finnished" their study too soon and missed some details.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Did you finish high school? Let's say the earth is 4.5 billion years old. That's what scientists tell us, right? Assuming this you'd have to be a moron by predicting cause and effect on the climate using 200 years of data about the climate. No true statistician would even try to make an accurate guess because the comparison of 200 years to 4.5 billion would be ridiculous. We also know that much of the data from the previous 200 years is skewed or inaccurate.