Albuquerque woman is suing Samsung for $1.8 million after pushing her cell phone into her vagina !!!!!!
I think we have another Darwin winner here!!!
WHY? WHY? WHY? You can't make this stuff up.
Woman sues Samsung for $1.8M after cell phone gets stuck inside her vagina.
An Albuquerque woman is suing Samsung for $1.8 million after she necessitated medical attention after inserting her cell phone inside her vagina and was unable to retrieve it for 96 hours. Salma Briant, 39, claims her medical bills at the University of New Mexico Hospital amount to $1,168,000 and that she has suffered from severe psychological distress because of the whole ordeal. Briant said she first inserted the cell phone inside her vagina as a dare from one of her friends but quickly realized that the phone would not come out.
Attorney Jim McAfee's claims his client was forced to undergo a cesarean section to remove the cell phone because of the atypical shape of her pelvis and had no insurance at the time.
A Samsung spokesman said they would not comment on this case.
"I wanted to see how it would feel to put my cell phone on vibration mode inside of me, just for fun, but it soon turned out to be a nightmare," she told judge Andrew Peterson in tears. "Samsung is definitely at fault here as they offer no warning about the dangers and potential risks during the insertion of their products inside their clients male or female body cavities or genitals" Salma Briant's lawyer, Jim McAfee said in court.
I wager she votes for the left!
I wonder if she irons her underwear while wearing it.
MR Mister wrote:
I think we have another Darwin winner here!!!
WHY? WHY? WHY? You can't make this stuff up.
Woman sues Samsung for $1.8M after cell phone gets stuck inside her vagina.
An Albuquerque woman is suing Samsung for $1.8 million after she necessitated medical attention after inserting her cell phone inside her vagina and was unable to retrieve it for 96 hours. Salma Briant, 39, claims her medical bills at the University of New Mexico Hospital amount to $1,168,000 and that she has suffered from severe psychological distress because of the whole ordeal. Briant said she first inserted the cell phone inside her vagina as a dare from one of her friends but quickly realized that the phone would not come out.
Attorney Jim McAfee's claims his client was forced to undergo a cesarean section to remove the cell phone because of the atypical shape of her pelvis and had no insurance at the time.
A Samsung spokesman said they would not comment on this case.
"I wanted to see how it would feel to put my cell phone on vibration mode inside of me, just for fun, but it soon turned out to be a nightmare," she told judge Andrew Peterson in tears. "Samsung is definitely at fault here as they offer no warning about the dangers and potential risks during the insertion of their products inside their clients male or female body cavities or genitals" Salma Briant's lawyer, Jim McAfee said in court.
I wager she votes for the left!
I wonder if she irons her underwear while wearing it.
I think we have another Darwin winner here!!! br ... (
show quote)
Hopefully the damage has made her sterile. Stupid is as stupid does, but at least that way she would not reproduce.
Good morning every one, I'M Back Warning to the progressives, SWMBO is much more polite than I am, and I am ready to GO!!!
NPP
MR Mister wrote:
I think we have another Darwin winner here!!!
WHY? WHY? WHY? You can't make this stuff up.
Woman sues Samsung for $1.8M after cell phone gets stuck inside her vagina.
An Albuquerque woman is suing Samsung for $1.8 million after she necessitated medical attention after inserting her cell phone inside her vagina and was unable to retrieve it for 96 hours. Salma Briant, 39, claims her medical bills at the University of New Mexico Hospital amount to $1,168,000 and that she has suffered from severe psychological distress because of the whole ordeal. Briant said she first inserted the cell phone inside her vagina as a dare from one of her friends but quickly realized that the phone would not come out.
Attorney Jim McAfee's claims his client was forced to undergo a cesarean section to remove the cell phone because of the atypical shape of her pelvis and had no insurance at the time.
A Samsung spokesman said they would not comment on this case.
"I wanted to see how it would feel to put my cell phone on vibration mode inside of me, just for fun, but it soon turned out to be a nightmare," she told judge Andrew Peterson in tears. "Samsung is definitely at fault here as they offer no warning about the dangers and potential risks during the insertion of their products inside their clients male or female body cavities or genitals" Salma Briant's lawyer, Jim McAfee said in court.
I wager she votes for the left!
I wonder if she irons her underwear while wearing it.
I think we have another Darwin winner here!!! br ... (
show quote)
Bottom of page on the very article you are posting as "fact" wrote:
World News Daily Report assumes all responsibility for the satirical nature of its articles and for the fictional nature of their content. All characters appearing in the articles in this website – even those based on real people – are entirely fictional and any resemblance between them and any person, living, dead or undead, is purely a miracle.
When you post satire, you should make it known in your post, otherwise the many fools will assume that it is real. Want proof?
no propaganda please wrote:
Hopefully the damage has made her sterile. Stupid is as stupid does, but at least that way she would not reproduce.
Good morning every one, I'M Back Warning to the progressives, SWMBO is much more polite than I am, and I am ready to GO!!!
NPP
Considering that it is not uncommon for homosexual males to insert large objects into their rectums as part of their sex "play", why should it be considered a joke that a deranged woman would insert a phone into her vagina for sexual pleasure. After all the vagina is a larger organ more easily expanded since it has to be able to provide room for a baby during birth? Unfortunately I do remember two boys we have worked with over the years who had large things like broom handles inserted into their rectums by the men who abused and tortured them. There for it is not a joke from my frame of reference.
NPP
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
When you post satire, you should make it known in your post, otherwise the many fools will assume that it is real. Want proof?
Don't be so quick to call others fools - there are a lot of crazies out there. And yes, there is an x-ray of some idiot with a cell phone up their anus in the below article. I grew up in the SF area which had its fair share of perverts.
https://www.ems1.com/trauma/articles/134776048-29-shocking-X-ray-images-of-rectal-foreign-bodies/
Pathetic isn't it? I don't want to know what these fools were thinking of, because they probably have no brain power to use.
Since that is a satirical website and it clearly states that fact at the bottom of the page, also in top right corner, where it states "Where facts don't matter", I would think that would be a good indication that the story is NOT real. Those that fall for it are not very bright. That and did anyone other than me bother noticing that no reputable sites are publishing the article? Another great indicator that it isn't actual news.
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Since that is a satirical website and it clearly states that fact at the bottom of the page, also in top right corner, where it states "Where facts don't matter", I would think that would be a good indication that the story is NOT real. Those that fall for it are not very bright. That and did anyone other than me bother noticing that no reputable sites are publishing the article? Another great indicator that it isn't actual news.
Where facts don't matter is the policy of the Progressives.
no propaganda please wrote:
Pathetic isn't it? I don't want to know what these fools were thinking of, because they probably have no brain power to use.
I grew up in the SF area where city councilmen shoved things up their rectum. Not much surprises me.
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Since that is a satirical website and it clearly states that fact at the bottom of the page, also in top right corner, where it states "Where facts don't matter", I would think that would be a good indication that the story is NOT real. Those that fall for it are not very bright. That and did anyone other than me bother noticing that no reputable sites are publishing the article? Another great indicator that it isn't actual news.
He didn’t provide a link and I didn’t care enough to search for it. If you are that innocent to what perversions are out there thats a good thing.
Rose42 wrote:
He didn’t provide a link and I didn’t care enough to search for it. If you are that innocent to what perversions are out there thats a good thing.
Over 40 years working with boys who have been abused, the evil that men do is no longer surprising, unfortunately.
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Since that is a satirical website and it clearly states that fact at the bottom of the page, also in top right corner, where it states "Where facts don't matter", I would think that would be a good indication that the story is NOT real. Those that fall for it are not very bright. That and did anyone other than me bother noticing that no reputable sites are publishing the article? Another great indicator that it isn't actual news.
The article I posted was in a news site, it had photos of the woman and her lawyer in a courthouse.
If you have a problem with it don't read it. If you hate the truth and you see a post by me don't open it, then you won't feel shocked by the true facts.
MR Mister wrote:
The article I posted was in a news site, it had photos of the woman and her lawyer in a courthouse.
If you have a problem with it don't read it. If you hate the truth and you see a post by me don't open it, then you won't feel shocked by the true facts.
So, this is yet another hill you wish your integrity to die on then, so be it.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/world-news-daily/https://hoax-alert.leadstories.com/3469792-fake-news-woman-sues-samsung-for-18m-after-cell-phone-gets-stuck-inside-her-vagina.htmlhttps://www.snopes.com/fact-check/samsung-cellphone-stuck/Edit:
Snopes debunking satirical article you posted wrote:
The photograph included with the story does not show a woman named Salma Briant but rather Kiersten Pyke, who filed a lawsuit against actor Tom Sizemore alleging that he had molested her when she was 11 years old:
Proof of that assertion posted in an image from an article on the incident posted below.
Notice the dates, Your article was posted on or about "SEPTEMBER 20, 2018" as that site does NOT attribute the author of the article nor state when it was first published, but the very first comment on the article dates back to this comment:
Quote:
MARY E HURLBURT | SEPTEMBER 20, 2018 AT 10:48 PM | REPLY
I bet she likes Tide pods,Snorting condoms and Licking toilets too. Does IDIOT ring a bell. No common sense for sure! I hope like hell that she loses
The REAL article where they snatched the picture for their satirical article was published "MAY 8, 2018 / 4:23 PM" and was attributed to "/ CBS/AP"
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tom-sizemore-sued-for-allegedly-groping-child-in-2003/ (Real article)
https://worldnewsdailyreport.com/woman-sues-samsung-for-1-8m-after-cell-phone-gets-stuck-inside-her-vagina/comment-page-1/#comments (Satirical article)
Upper right corner, where it says "Where facts don't matter".
The entirety of the text listed.
Feeling stupid yet? If not, just wait, it'll sink in.
It has got to suck being as gullible as you obviously are.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.