rumitoid

Wow, talk about brain-washed. Sorry, but you need to expand your sources of information.

rumitoid

Love you, you old rascal.

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Say what you will, but, I'll watch it all play out, then make up my own mind.
If I'm wrong, I'll admit it.
How about you?

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Yep!

Congress Exposes FBI Coup Against Trump
https://youtu.be/HCNhEwEK40Y

The best 30 minutes from Inspector General Horowitz's testimony -- Want to know what the Inspector General's investigation into the FBI handling of the Clinton emails really says? Watch Congressman Trey Gowdy and Senator Lindsey Graham blow the lid off the scheme to take down President Trump, from inside the FBI.

The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump

https://www.amazon.com/Russia-Hoax-Illicit-Hillary-Clinton/dp/0062872745
Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett reveals the real story behind Hillary Clinton’s deep state collaborators in government and exposes their nefarious actions during and after the 2016 election.
The Russia Hoax reveals how persons within the FBI and Barack Obama’s Justice Department worked improperly to help elect Hillary Clinton and defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.
When this suspected effort failed, those same people appear to have pursued a contrived investigation of President Trump in an attempt to undo the election results and remove him as president.
The evidence suggests that partisans within the FBI and the Department of Justice, driven by personal animus and a misplaced sense of political righteousness, surreptitiously acted to subvert electoral democracy in our country.
The book will examine:
• How did Hillary Clinton manage to escape prosecution despite compelling evidence she violated the law?
• Did Peter Strzok, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Loretta Lynch, and others obstruct justice by protecting Clinton?
• Why was there never a legitimate criminal investigation of Clinton in the Uranium One case?
• Are the text messages exchanged between Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page evidence of a concerted effort to undermine the electoral process?
• Was there ever any real evidence of "collusion" between Trump and the Russians?
• Did Trump obstruct justice in the firing of Comey or was he legally exercising his constitutional authority?
• Did the FBI and DOJ improperly use a discredited "dossier" about Trump to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on Trump associates?
• Should Mueller have disqualified himself under the special counsel law based on glaring conflicts of interest?
• Was fired National Security Adviser Michael Flynn unfairly charged with making a false statement?
With insightful analysis and a fact-filled narrative, The Russia Hoax delves deeply into Democrat wrongdoing.

rumitoid

Great questions. I will attempt my best left-leaning mind to answer. Oops, did I say left-leaning mind? I meant to say my best critical and unbiased thoughts. Yes, that is what I meant. Swear to God. Scout's honor. On my mother's grave, so help me Sata...er, God.

"How did Hillary Clinton manage to escape prosecution despite compelling evidence she violated the law?
-Interesting anecdote about the Hillary emails is the devastating force Comey's announcement about new investigations into that issue less than a week before the election probably sabotaged her presidential bid: and the Right wants to label him a deep-state operative for the Left? What twisted logic arrives at that conclusion? Deep-state for the Right seems far more apt.

"Did Peter Strzok, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Loretta Lynch, and others obstruct justice by protecting Clinton?"
-Zero evidence for this. Strzok, Lynch, and McCabe had nothing to with investigation, and Comey threw a monkey wrench into Hillary's run.

"Why was there never a legitimate criminal investigation of Clinton in the Uranium One case?"
-There was a two year investigation by Republican-held Congress that could not any clear wrong-doing. Hillary was just one of eight that had to sign off on the deal. It was totally legit. Low grade uranium, not nuclear compatible. This issue has been dead, dead, dead for years. Just Conspiracy theorists, with their tin-foil triangular hats, still wonder.

"Are the text messages exchanged between Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page evidence of a concerted effort to undermine the electoral process?"
-Sorry, but this is way too funny. How do personal exchanges between lovers who find Trump a loser and disgusting effect the electoral process? Hope you can see the absurdity. Oh, except for this: two votes for Hillary.

"Was there ever any real evidence of "collusion" between Trump and the Russians?"
-Yes and no, but the Mueller Probe never focused on collusion because it was too vague; they investigated possible obstruction of justice. Was Trump cleared of collusion? No, because no attempt was made to make a case for it. But the Obstruction of Justice inquires produced ten possible incidences Of Trump's interefence. Mueller did not make any indictments for those because it was unclear if a sitting president could be indicted: he specifically left it up to Congress, and not Bill Barr, to decide.

"Did Trump obstruct justice in the firing of Comey or was he legally exercising his constitutional authority?"
-That is a question way beyond me. Executive authority carries a lot of weight, and justly so. But we have the situation when Nixon fired Cox. Do you feel that should be a crime?

"Did the FBI and DOJ improperly use a discredited "dossier" about Trump to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on Trump associates?"
-First and foremost and glaring is that the Steele dossier is not--not!--discredited. Not all of it has been proven or disproved. Certain timelines of meetings with Russinas by Americans in the dossier have been shown to be accurate. Maybe the rest is wild fantasy.

"Should Mueller have disqualified himself under the special counsel law based on glaring conflicts of interest?"
-There are no "glaring conflicts of interest." This is just absurd and desperate.

"Was fired National Security Adviser Michael Flynn unfairly charged with making a false statement?"
- Simple: No! And he said as such.

jeff smith

you know those anti Trumpers can do wonders . you are the ones " dem. followers " that for nearly three years have been fed lies . you want to believe your bimbocratic leaders . yet all this time they keep spitting out lie after lie concerning President Trump . the puppet masters must of really done a number on all of you " dem. followers " going through the education process . or should I say the indoctrination process . while they pretended to educate you . I did not read much of your hate sense that's all it is . but I do know that President Trump has done more for this country than ANY president I quite some time . what about all the lies from obumer , or hitlary . you think he was so good . that she was some thing special . what about all of their LIES .

jeff smith

not at all bobo . I see very clearly . it is the dem. followers who have been brain washed . just look at all of you candidates . socialist verging into communist . yep you people are real Americans . destroy this country and tear up the constitution and the bill of rights . that's what they have been spitting out of their mouths sense they hit the campaign trail . in very small comments open boarders , drivers license for illegals not renew gun dealer license , free medicare for illegals , medicare for all , free collage and sorry bobo NOTHING IS FREE . how high are you willing to go on taxes ? 50% 60% the rich can move corporations can move , all of them out of the country . I can't leave the country . can you ? so , how much of your income are you willing to give up so everything can be free ?

jeff smith

one more thing . WHAT PART OF WHAT I SAID WAS WRONG?

Common_Sense_Matters

Actually... She DIDN'T sit in on that one, Jose Fernandez represented the State Department in that deal. I am sure she sent him in her stead to avoid the appearance of impropriety, not that it helped any since people still make unfounded accusations.



Give the fool a break, he misspoke. I am sure he means that they conspired to sway the investigation in order to make Trump "falsely appear to be a criminal".



Good job on the rest of the questions. You do know however that facts do not phase Eagle, right? He will be back to spewing the same nonsense in no time at all.

Common_Sense_Matters

Yes, yes, by all means, go ahead and continue believing lies over facts, that is about the only thing you Trumpsters are good at. Okay, let's try this another way, prove that either Trump did NOT say what he said or that Obama DID beg for a meeting that Kim Jong Un wanted to have more than Obama did. If you fail to prove either, then obviously Trump DID lie about it, meaning that Trump Does tell all these lies, contrary to what you ignorant Trumpsters like to claim. What? Are you too lazy to do your own fact checking? Perhaps you are too intellectually deficient to do it.

If the latter is the case, wouldn't that suggest to you that you are too intellectually inferior to make proper determinations as to what is best for this country? It is obvious I was able to manage to find evidence that proved that Trump did tell that lie on the one I personally fact checked. I also gave good cause to show that Kim Jong Un was more interested in a meeting with Obama than Obama was in having a meeting with Kim Jong Un. Obviously Obama would not have been begging for a meeting nor would he have needed to since Kim Jong Un wanted one more than he did.

Either be willing to back your lies up with facts or quit spreading them.

rumitoid

Do you mean besides all of it, nothing.

jeff smith

I do not care if obumer never wanted to meet with N.K. leader Un . if Trump said he did i don't care about that either . you dems. take all of these little things and try to make a mountain range out of them . whoppy , whoppy . and you seem to be a typical dem. insultes upon insultes if some one does not agree with your point . no I do not get news from hate mongers like your liberal bimbocratic propaganda news machine . I do listen to FOX from time to time but mostly Christian news outlets and the BBC . every once in a while I will tune it CNN or CNBC but all I ever hear from them is hate and LIES . they are pushing the bimbocrates agenda to try to convince every one they can that President Trump , is a danger to America . not like all those socialit verging onto - into communism that are soppose to be bimbocrates running for the Presidency . you keep believing all those LIES from your leadership and " news " outlets again the little things that President Trump may have wrong is NOTHING . like I said you people of the dem. followers listen to bull dung and they convence you tha the tiny grain of sand is a entire mountain range . how about Benghazi ? how about "fast and furious "? how about the IRS scandal? NOW THEM WAS SOME LIES OF MAJOR PROPORTIONS . but them don't matter sence it was a scum sucking bimbocrate that was involved in these scandals . oh and obumer bowing and kissing the ring hand of a middle eastern king . the supper deal he mad with the Iranians . what 5 or 10 years and they could proceed with making a nuke . keep dreaming . some day your bimbocrats will destroy this country .

rumitoid

Just my learned opinion.

jeff smith

[quote=rumitoid]Do you mean besides all of it, nothing.[/quo that's right bobo. everything I said WAS TRUE.

rumitoid

Wow. You make certain my fear about our future. The paucity of decency. The blindness. The utter lack of discernment or question. It is a horror flick.