Rule of law?...what is it?

Is it ignoring "illegal aliens" and mayors defying our sovereignty as a insignificant aspect of being legal citizens?


Is it having a political party (progdemolibs) who make a phone call and people like Jussie Smollet has his criminal behavior dismissed.?

Is when Lying Loretta Lynch tells Comey to treat Hillary's emails crimes, as just a matter.?

And by the way, Lynch and Comey have opposing stories as to her ordering him to do so.

Is it when the intelligence agencies work for the left in the political process?

It's just come out that the CIA gave different intelligence briefings to Trump than they did to Clinton.

The leftists have such a mob of leftover Obama deep state operatives, that you poor people are convinced that sedition is patriotic.

How about this Perm, do you feel that making it law, that old men can be in the bathrooms with little girls.

If so, why not install urinals in women's bathrooms, so little girls can watch them shake it when done?

you are getting off the subject as usual for a republican, that is not the issue he is talking about. if you can`t stick to the subject don`t respond it`s annoying. The issue is that he was told she needed to go because she was in violation of the hatch act and that has nothing to do with the drool that you have been blurting out. typical republican Trump supporter, can`t respond to the statement about the statement because he knows Trump is in the wrong so you have to change the subject pathetic little man.

you are getting off the subject as usual for a republican, that is not the issue he is talking about. if you can`t stick to the subject don`t respond it`s annoying. The issue is that he was told she needed to go because she was in violation of the hatch act and that has nothing to do with the drool that you have been blurting out. typical republican Trump supporter, can`t respond to the statement about the statement because he knows Trump is in the wrong so you have to change the subject pathetic little man.

gee louie, it seem to me that we on the left must read a different version of the Mueller report than the right wingers...

Here’s some stuff you might not hear on Fox “News”

In 2016 members of the Justice Department sat down with the gang of eight INCLUDING Mitch McConnell and warned them about Russian election interference.

McConnell insisted that they keep it to themselves, lest if affect the outcome of the election. It’s hard to say what his exact intentions were at the time, but the results speak for themselves.

As Mueller said of the Russians in his statement on May 29, “there were multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our election.”

Volume I of the report enumerates 150 points of contact between Russian operatives and the Trump organization.

Volume II details TEN attempts on Trump’s part to obstruct justice.

Mueller said that DOJ policy prevented him from indicting or charging Trump, but that the EVIDENCE they found PREVENTED him from exonerating Trump.

My conclusions:

President Obama tried to warn us, but was thwarted by Mitch McConnell, just as McConnell stole a Supreme Court nomination from President Obama.
The Russians offered help, Trump accepted it and was helped by it.
Trump tried to stop the investigation into his collusion (something that Mueller said that they were specifically not considering) and continuing conspiracies and obstruction of Justice.
Besides being an unindicted co-conspirator in the Michael Cohen case, Trump is now an unindicted criminal in a case all of his own making, protected only by the shield of the presidency and a crooked Attorney General.

That was really a laugh. McConnell stopping Obama from doing anything about the Russians getting involved in our election. The Republicans had about as much of control, of what Obama did in his term as a chance of hell of convincing Obama to do anything. You seemed to read in between the lines about what the actual lines were stating. There is no actual determination of Trump as being an unindicted criminal. That is only in the minds of those clouded by the progressive thinking. Mueller said that no one in the Trump organization colluded with the Russians. End of story. How is the attorney general crooked? I defy you to produce any actual evidence except what is in your deluded minds.

With those 150 points of contact, Mueller decided to say there no proven allegations of collusion. That seems to squash your partisan view. There are no actual facts to support your foregone conclusion of President Trump, trying to stop the collusion investigation.
Obstruction of justice is a broad crime that includes perjury, witness tampering, jury tampering and destruction of evidence. Obstruction also applies to coercion that means threats and the act of physical harm. Which Trump never had done. As for the Michael Cohen case of using money to pay off the stripper, that money was Trumps own money and not of his campaign. How has the Attorney General been crooked in any way, shape of form. I believe that is only in you ideological mind. We will need to wait till the reports that are yet to be finalized by the inspector general and others.

With the shear volume of blatant criminal behavior of the last administration, I don't want to pressure President Trump to do anything he doesn't want to.

You folks set the precedent with Hillardy/Obama

Donald Trump is fighting for our national sovereignty, which is opposite of the Kenyan.

I'm like you folks are about Obama, with a few small exceptions.

I don't worship men as gods. Men are fallible, even the leftist supreme being called Obama.

Donald Trump has made a couple of mistakes, but I'm fine with his executive decisions.

The Kenyan was sinking our nation quick, and I find no redeeming qualities in him.