One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Liberal Ideology is Hateful and Borderline Sociopathic
Page <prev 2 of 37 next> last>>
Apr 1, 2014 21:02:59   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
Nickolai wrote:
I see the author is a graduate of Liberty University Jerry Falwell's school for ultra right wingnuts

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Great beginning, Newbie :!: I always try to welcome newcomers here, but in the case where they come in on day one and smart mouthing people they don't know one teeny thing about strikes me as indescribably rude, crude, crass, and Progressive. It also leaves the impression with oldtimers that newbie is a plant. Are you a plant?

Reply
Apr 1, 2014 21:21:06   #
rumitoid
 
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yeah, that's an expected comment from a person who knows NOTHING about law enforcement NOR logical thinking. Think it through, rummi, and reality MAY have a chance to take seed in your mind(?).


Why do you say I know nothing about law ENFORCEMENT when that idiot is saying it is not his job to ENFORCE (protect and serve) but merely to investigate after the harm is done? Are you going to insult my intelligence by saying that I am incapable of logical thought because I have an opinion different than yours? I thought we had reached some common ground of respect. Guess I was wrong.

Reply
Apr 1, 2014 21:23:46   #
rumitoid
 
Nickolai wrote:
I see the author is a graduate of Liberty University Jerry Falwell's school for ultra right wingnuts


Lol, summa cum laude.

Reply
 
 
Apr 1, 2014 22:01:01   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
rumitoid wrote:
Why do you say I know nothing about law ENFORCEMENT when that idiot is saying it is not his job to ENFORCE (protect and serve) but merely to investigate after the harm is done? Are you going to insult my intelligence by saying that I am incapable of logical thought because I have an opinion different than yours? I thought we had reached some common ground of respect. Guess I was wrong.


If it insults your intelligence for me to utter the logical conclusion from your inane remark I cannot help you. Unlike your "leaders", I don't feel compelled to lie.

Reply
Apr 1, 2014 22:19:41   #
Ve'hoe
 
I don't think he is,,,, he is reacting to the usurpation of authority of an unjust and unrepresentative government,,, of sociopaths, and narcissists who want to control and are ignoring the constitution,,,, to wit, the constitution and founders had two remedies:
1. The people rise up peacefully in a Constitution of States, and override the out of control Federal anarchists.
2. The people rise up Armed,,, because "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." All the "people" of a state are part of the militia,,, and all should bear arms to protect the freedoms granted by God,,not Odumma, holder, and other sociopaths,,,,who refuse to uphold and defend the constitution as they swore to do,,

What I do not agree with is that if I fight this out of control fed and win,,, that I turn the control back over to politicians, attorneys, and or liberals/ anyone who refused to fight. Nor allow any "bystanding peace mongers/cowards" to share in the rewards of the freedom they wouldn't defend for themselves or others. Those who wont fight for freedoms or don't believe they are worth fighting for are the sociopaths who caused the breakdown and destruction of our society, with liberal/communist ideologies, hate filled socialist ideas against the people and their rights, and an old style Ruling Class or caste system,, based on your euphemistic "superior intelligence" that allowed your side to delude themselves that subservience was better than freedom, and that your liberal demands of entitlements super-ceded other citizens rights or property, or that the Govt got to choose which laws it enforced and which it didn't.

What we have learned from Putin vs odumma is that when odumma has to actually fight he is a spineless wuss, and if stood up to, will back down. But, if he does fight, his knowledge is shallow, and lacks any fortitude, strategy, or intelligence.... he is a wuss. And that without the force of law,,, in an orderly and obedient society, resident erkel doesn't know what to do,,,,,,





rumitoid wrote:
"Sheriff David A. Clarke has caused quite a stir in his home state of Wisconsin for suggesting that citizens take the prerogative to defend themselves, because the job of police is to investigate crime, not stop it."
The duty of police from its inception is, and as always advertized, to "protect and serve." This sheriff is promoting anarchy--vigilante consciousness--in prompting citizens to take matters into their own hands because he can't or won't do the job he is assigned. His attitude is utterly disgraceful. In effect he is saying die or get robbed and then I will help find the culprit. He is opting off the wall of providing safety for citizens in exchange for a desk after the fact of harm done. Vile!

That sheriff is the sociopath.
"Sheriff David A. Clarke has caused quite a ... (show quote)

Reply
Apr 1, 2014 22:38:44   #
Ve'hoe
 
well, the precedence has been set, in the LA riots for this,,, the police flatly stated, "We do not have to protect and serve" and refused to come into neighborhoods where they were being shot at,,, so no they don't have to protect and serve,, it is just a slogan.

The Sheriff is a higher authority,, established and regulated by the state constitution,,, technically the cops have to do what he says, inline with the state constitution,,,, a very fine line is walked now, when rogue democrats and liberals are "interpreting" the constitutions and trampling others rights,,, the left is forcing a showdown,,

I will be armed, and on the side of the sheriff,,,, peaceniks, police, or fed thugs be damned, I don't care about the rights of those who didn't care about others' rights...
rumitoid wrote:
Why do you say I know nothing about law ENFORCEMENT when that idiot is saying it is not his job to ENFORCE (protect and serve) but merely to investigate after the harm is done? Are you going to insult my intelligence by saying that I am incapable of logical thought because I have an opinion different than yours? I thought we had reached some common ground of respect. Guess I was wrong.

Reply
Apr 1, 2014 22:39:01   #
rumitoid
 
Tasine wrote:
If it insults your intelligence for me to utter the logical conclusion from your inane remark I cannot help you. Unlike your "leaders", I don't feel compelled to lie.


What? I gave you all due respect and my honest opinion. If you care not to respond to my view, fine. If I was inane, show me. The suggestion I take my cue blindly from some "leader" is below the belt. You appear to be looking past me as a person. I thought we were at least at a detente if not friends. Your denigrating remarks are worrisome.

Reply
 
 
Apr 1, 2014 22:39:49   #
Nickolai
 
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Great beginning, Newbie :!: I always try to welcome newcomers here, but in the case where they come in on day one and smart mouthing people they don't know one teeny thing about strikes me as indescribably rude, crude, crass, and Progressive. It also leaves the impression with oldtimers that newbie is a plant. Are you a plant?


A plant? A plant for what. I'm a plant for no one just and old timer that is somewhat stunned by the hatemongers on the right on this site. Also a student of History. I'll be 8o years young in August and it seems that these young conservsatives have a lot to learn And thought I might be of help.

Reply
Apr 1, 2014 22:43:56   #
rumitoid
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
well, the precedence has been set, in the LA riots for this,,, the police flatly stated, "We do not have to protect and serve" and refused to come into neighborhoods where they were being shot at,,, so no they don't have to protect and serve,, it is just a slogan.

The Sheriff is a higher authority,, established and regulated by the state constitution,,, technically the cops have to do what he says, inline with the state constitution,,,, a very fine line is walked now, when rogue democrats and liberals are "interpreting" the constitutions and trampling others rights,,, the left is forcing a showdown,,

I will be armed, and on the side of the sheriff,,,, peaceniks, police, or fed thugs be damned, I don't care about the rights of those who didn't care about others' rights...
well, the precedence has been set, in the LA riots... (show quote)


That they refused to do their job in LA does not mean it is not their sworn duty. Duty is just a slogan to those only after a paycheck or afraid.

When the disgraceful comments of this "sheriff" are not meet with moral outrage but rather support and defense, I know America is lost.

Reply
Apr 1, 2014 22:49:13   #
Ve'hoe
 
NO,,, it was determined that they had no obligation,,,
Tell me about frauds, when odumma wont support and defend the constitution,, if he doesn't agree with or didn't author the law,,,not to mention, his phone and pen,,,

Why should I respect anyone who says or agrees with that,,, since like you say, they are only there for the paycheck, what they can steal , or are afraid of others freedom...

Obama believers and sycophants cannot preach out of the other side of their mouths about duty, honor, and country,,, in Benghazi, the shat on all three,,,,,,in fast and furious the same,,, in not defending the borders,,, likewise,,



rumitoid wrote:
That they refused to do their job in LA does not mean it is not their sworn duty. Duty is just a slogan to those only after a paycheck or afraid.

When the disgraceful comments of this "sheriff" are not meet with moral outrage but rather support and defense, I know America is lost.

Reply
Apr 1, 2014 22:51:33   #
Ve'hoe
 
I find him brave, and his comments are not disgraceful,,
Like your kIng said:
"We are the people we have been waiting for"

Well, this is the fight they have been picking,,, now it is someone elses "problem" if they stand up!?!

Very liberal of you.....IF that is America, in your opinion, better that it be lost.......

rumitoid wrote:
That they refused to do their job in LA does not mean it is not their sworn duty. Duty is just a slogan to those only after a paycheck or afraid.

When the disgraceful comments of this "sheriff" are not meet with moral outrage but rather support and defense, I know America is lost.

Reply
 
 
Apr 1, 2014 23:04:36   #
rumitoid
 
Tasine wrote:
If it insults your intelligence for me to utter the logical conclusion from your inane remark I cannot help you. Unlike your "leaders", I don't feel compelled to lie.


But you have not bothered "to utter" the logical conclusion of my supposed "inane remark": it would be helpful

Reply
Apr 1, 2014 23:08:55   #
rumitoid
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
NO,,, it was determined that they had no obligation,,,
Tell me about frauds, when odumma wont support and defend the constitution,, if he doesn't agree with or didn't author the law,,,not to mention, his phone and pen,,,

Why should I respect anyone who says or agrees with that,,, since like you say, they are only there for the paycheck, what they can steal , or are afraid of others freedom...

Obama believers and sycophants cannot preach out of the other side of their mouths about duty, honor, and country,,, in Benghazi, the shat on all three,,,,,,in fast and furious the same,,, in not defending the borders,,, likewise,,
NO,,, it was determined that they had no obligatio... (show quote)


Lol what is the topic? Disgraceful thoughts and actions by some idiot sheriff and that somehow brings Obama into the picture? Tired of this constant misdirection: are we going to stick to the topic or not?

Reply
Apr 1, 2014 23:12:16   #
rumitoid
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
I find him brave, and his comments are not disgraceful,,
Like your kIng said:
"We are the people we have been waiting for"

Well, this is the fight they have been picking,,, now it is someone elses "problem" if they stand up!?!

Very liberal of you.....IF that is America, in your opinion, better that it be lost.......


Lol, what? I am being saddled with all idiot liberal ideology for disagreeing with this sheriff? I am libtard and koolaid drinking by expressing my opinion? Both you and Tasine need some juice or something.

Reply
Apr 1, 2014 23:22:51   #
Had enough
 
Tasine wrote:
Imagine my surprise when I found this article saying what I've been saying for a long time except that I refer to Progressive ideology as hateful and absolutely sociopathic.

Excerpts:

Sheriff David A. Clarke has caused quite a stir in his home state of Wisconsin for suggesting that citizens take the prerogative to defend themselves, because the job of police is to investigate crime, not stop it.

These do-gooders are now defining down socially acceptable behavior for black students in school. Bad behavior is being excused and attempts to hold black kids accountable by enforcing codes of conduct are called racist.

Having a sense of discipline has always been considered a virtue, a redeeming quality, but now its roots are claimed to lie in racism.

White liberal elites have chimed in about school codes of conduct.

SheriffClarkeSheriff Clarke’s views on education are sure to earn him more contempt from the left, but they come as a breath of fresh air from conservatives who are fighting to improve education in our poorest communities.

The reality is that the liberal education program is not about the children. It’s about two things: power and control. Liberals are using our public education system to maintain current power and to ensure future control. Public Schools have become liberal indoctrination camps where diversity of thought is frowned upon and only liberal orthodoxy is deemed politically correct. That means that conservative answers to improving education cannot be allowed – even if they are completely effective. It also means that the liberal status quo on education must be maintained – even if those liberal policies are the problem.

But Sheriff Clarke is having none of that liberal propaganda.

Liberals call their ideology compassionate. I call it hateful.

You would have to absolutely loathe black people to want to keep them mired in generational poverty and ignorance, living in ghettos with high unemployment, with their kids shackled to failing K-12 urban school systems and crime-ridden neighborhoods just to secure a permanent voting majority and to hang onto political power.

This is borderline sociopathic behavior.

Black people are survivors. We have survived slavery, Jim Crow laws and other forms of discrimination. We can overcome the burden of liberal policies if they just leave us alone to get out of this predicament by ourselves.

I find it insulting that liberals view us in such an infantile manner, implying that we cannot make it without their help.

Once we free our minds of this debilitating government dependency and liberals get their boot off our necks, we can begin to rebuild our community.

View at: http://eaglerising.com/5416/liberal-ideology-hateful-borderline-sociopathic/
Imagine my surprise when I found this article sayi... (show quote)

I believe every word of this article. So odumbass along with Holder is suing schools that want to help poor blacks and white people. How hysterically funny is that!!! What happened to programs like My Brothers keeper??? Ohhhhhh, I know. Odumbass thinks he knows how to do it better!! What an ignoramus he is. More power to the schools that want to help these young people!!!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 37 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.