I don't think he is,,,, he is reacting to the usurpation of authority of an unjust and unrepresentative government,,, of sociopaths, and narcissists who want to control and are ignoring the constitution,,,, to wit, the constitution and founders had two remedies:
1. The people rise up peacefully in a Constitution of States, and override the out of control Federal anarchists.
2. The people rise up Armed,,, because "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." All the "people" of a state are part of the militia,,, and all should bear arms to protect the freedoms granted by God,,not Odumma, holder, and other sociopaths,,,,who refuse to uphold and defend the constitution as they swore to do,,
What I do not agree with is that if I fight this out of control fed and win,,, that I turn the control back over to politicians, attorneys, and or liberals/ anyone who refused to fight. Nor allow any "bystanding peace mongers/cowards" to share in the rewards of the freedom they wouldn't defend for themselves or others. Those who wont fight for freedoms or don't believe they are worth fighting for are the sociopaths who caused the breakdown and destruction of our society, with liberal/communist ideologies, hate filled socialist ideas against the people and their rights, and an old style Ruling Class or caste system,, based on your euphemistic "superior intelligence" that allowed your side to delude themselves that subservience was better than freedom, and that your liberal demands of entitlements super-ceded other citizens rights or property, or that the Govt got to choose which laws it enforced and which it didn't.
What we have learned from Putin vs odumma is that when odumma has to actually fight he is a spineless wuss, and if stood up to, will back down. But, if he does fight, his knowledge is shallow, and lacks any fortitude, strategy, or intelligence.... he is a wuss. And that without the force of law,,, in an orderly and obedient society, resident erkel doesn't know what to do,,,,,,
rumitoid wrote:
"Sheriff David A. Clarke has caused quite a stir in his home state of Wisconsin for suggesting that citizens take the prerogative to defend themselves, because the job of police is to investigate crime, not stop it."
The duty of police from its inception is, and as always advertized, to "protect and serve." This sheriff is promoting anarchy--vigilante consciousness--in prompting citizens to take matters into their own hands because he can't or won't do the job he is assigned. His attitude is utterly disgraceful. In effect he is saying die or get robbed and then I will help find the culprit. He is opting off the wall of providing safety for citizens in exchange for a desk after the fact of harm done. Vile!
That sheriff is the sociopath.
"Sheriff David A. Clarke has caused quite a ... (
show quote)