One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Youtube is censoring Steven Crowder....
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Jun 7, 2019 00:21:51   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6045529991001/#sp=show-clips

I love his show Louder with Crowder....on Youtube!!!

Reply
Jun 7, 2019 01:12:31   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
proud republican wrote:
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6045529991001/#sp=show-clips

I love his show Louder with Crowder....on Youtube!!!


It is very enjoyable

Far too much is being censored...

Reply
Jun 7, 2019 03:12:16   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
It is very enjoyable

Far too much is being censored...


Welcome to Communist Country,America!!!

Reply
 
 
Jun 7, 2019 06:25:39   #
billy a Loc: South Florida
 
I'm not very tech-savvy. Three years ago I had dozens of firearm-related sites to visit on YouTube. Now,very few. I'm done with y.t. but don't know where to go for a similar format/variety...any suggestions?

Reply
Jun 7, 2019 07:55:27   #
Kevyn
 
proud republican wrote:
Welcome to Communist Country,America!!!


Please explain how you come to the conclusion that a private company deciding what they will and will not allow on their platform has anything at all to do with communism.

Reply
Jun 7, 2019 08:04:39   #
Airforceone
 
Kevyn wrote:
Please explain how you come to the conclusion that a private company deciding what they will and will not allow on their platform has anything at all to do with communism.


Can’t wait for his response, any bets he will either insult you again or just avoid the answer.

Reply
Jun 7, 2019 08:29:04   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Kevyn wrote:
Please explain how you come to the conclusion that a private company deciding what they will and will not allow on their platform has anything at all to do with communism.


China is a Communist nation that controls the social input that is allowed... It does this via the control of social media companies...

When a private entity in the US decides to start banning any demographic it is cause for concern...

Simply put you cannot operate in a nation that allows for freedom of speech if you yourself do not allow for it...

If Youtube decided to have rules concerning the content of posts that would be fine... But they would need to apply the standards equally to all posters..

Your turn...

Explain why a private company like Youtube can decide who posts on it, but a baker doesn't have the right to decide who he designs a cake for? (Unless you are equally outraged at that one...)

Reply
 
 
Jun 7, 2019 08:33:53   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
China is a Communist nation that controls the social input that is allowed... It does this via the control of social media companies...

When a private entity in the US decides to start banning any demographic it is cause for concern...

Simply put you cannot operate in a nation that allows for freedom of speech if you yourself do not allow for it...

If Youtube decided to have rules concerning the content of posts that would be fine... But they would need to apply the standards equally to all posters..

Your turn...

Explain why a private company like Youtube can decide who posts on it, but a baker doesn't have the right to decide who he designs a cake for? (Unless you are equally outraged at that one...)
China is a Communist nation that controls the soci... (show quote)



Reply
Jun 7, 2019 09:01:35   #
Kevyn
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
China is a Communist nation that controls the social input that is allowed... It does this via the control of social media companies...

When a private entity in the US decides to start banning any demographic it is cause for concern...

Simply put you cannot operate in a nation that allows for freedom of speech if you yourself do not allow for it...

If Youtube decided to have rules concerning the content of posts that would be fine... But they would need to apply the standards equally to all posters..

Your turn...

Explain why a private company like Youtube can decide who posts on it, but a baker doesn't have the right to decide who he designs a cake for? (Unless you are equally outraged at that one...)
China is a Communist nation that controls the soci... (show quote)


The baker is an entity known as a public accommodation and is subject to the civil rights act, they are within their rights to refuse to decorate a cake with an objectionable message, for instance a pornographic image they can not however refuse service to people due to their sexual orientation, religion or race. You tube is not providing a platform for specific content they see as harmful such as the streaming of the assault rifle massacre in New Zealand, pornography or posters who deny the holocaust. If a poster repeats posting clips that violate the corporate standards they are denied the ability to post. Similar to the way a habitual drunk who starts fights is banned from a pub. They are very different situations.

Reply
Jun 7, 2019 09:11:36   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Kevyn wrote:
The baker is an entity known as a public accommodation and is subject to the civil rights act, they are within their rights to refuse to decorate a cake with an objectionable message, for instance a pornographic image they can not however refuse service to people due to their sexual orientation, religion or race.


The baker in question didn't refuse to service the customer... He refused to actively participate in an activity he found morally abhorrent...

Would a professional photographer be out of line if they refused to service a nudist wedding?

Quote:
You tube is not providing a platform for specific content they see as harmful such as the streaming of the assault rifle massacre in New Zealand, pornography or posters who deny the holocaust. If a poster repeats posting clips that violate the corporate standards they are denied the ability to post. Similar to the way a habitual drunk who starts fights is banned from a pub. They are very different situations.


I agree that Youtube has the right to set guidelines... As long as they are applied equally to all...

The drunk analogy doesn't hold up...
The drunk has demonstrated a potential menace...
The poster has merely upset certain sensibilities... Which is absurd as Youtube cannot be forced on anyone...

Reply
Jun 7, 2019 10:19:34   #
moldyoldy
 
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/6/6/1863048/-Bullied-by-Trump-YouTube-bungles-case-of-racist-homophobic-conservative-host?detail=emaildkre

Reply
 
 
Jun 7, 2019 10:32:06   #
Kevyn
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I agree that Youtube has the right to set guidelines... As long as they are applied equally to all...

The drunk analogy doesn't hold up...
The drunk has demonstrated a potential menace...
The poster has merely upset certain sensibilities... Which is absurd as Youtube cannot be forced on anyone...


Alex Jones demonstrated a menace when one of his nutter followers shot up a commit pizza joint after Jones lied and said there was a sex dungeon with little kids in the basement. Good riddance to this lying hate fueled scum. The baker doesn’t participate in anything he simple makes a cake.

Reply
Jun 7, 2019 10:58:21   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Kevyn wrote:
Alex Jones demonstrated a menace when one of his nutter followers shot up a commit pizza joint after Jones lied and said there was a sex dungeon with little kids in the basement. Good riddance to this lying hate fueled scum. The baker doesn’t participate in anything he simple makes a cake.


We almost had a civil dialogue going...

Why conflate Alex Jones with Steven Crowder?

The baker participates through the act of designing - a utilization of his innate artistic talent...

If it was only a cake the "gentlemen" wanted then there was a whole shop full of them to choose from...

It wasn't selling a cake tgat the baker was refusing to do...

Reply
Jun 7, 2019 11:23:03   #
vernon
 
Kevyn wrote:
The baker is an entity known as a public accommodation and is subject to the civil rights act, they are within their rights to refuse to decorate a cake with an objectionable message, for instance a pornographic image they can not however refuse service to people due to their sexual orientation, religion or race. You tube is not providing a platform for specific content they see as harmful such as the streaming of the assault rifle massacre in New Zealand, pornography or posters who deny the holocaust. If a poster repeats posting clips that violate the corporate standards they are denied the ability to post. Similar to the way a habitual drunk who starts fights is banned from a pub. They are very different situations.
The baker is an entity known as a public accommoda... (show quote)


This whole discussion proves one thing to me .The govt has taken control of just too much of our lives
and thats one reason I call call them communistic .

Reply
Jun 7, 2019 11:26:37   #
moldyoldy
 
vernon wrote:
This whole discussion proves one thing to me .The govt has taken control of just too much of our lives
and thats one reason I call call them communistic .


Did the government do it or did you tube do it?

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.