One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Parents are furious after what one popular children’s cartoon just did
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
Jun 5, 2019 14:44:01   #
Rose42
 
redpill wrote:
Right on! OPP members CANNOT control themselves. I'm getting so f...ing sick of having the scroll through off-topic crap. These trolls need to start their own threads like I HATE TRUMP, or ABORTIONS R US. Good God people, chill.

On topic. The episode sounds fairly ...???... non-threatening as an indoctrination to the age group watching, but that is how indoctrination begins. I say, put such alternative choices at a higher age level where the kids can make informed questions.


Leave it to parents. Sexual perversion has no place in children’s cartoons

Reply
Jun 5, 2019 22:32:53   #
alabuck Loc: Tennessee
 
2quick4u wrote:
Spoken like the true hypocrites all you whiney liberals are Afarce.. Let me ask you-how many (unborn) children were murdered last year.. and the year before.. and the one before that.. simply b/c your side refuses to consider anything that doesn't award the potential mother-to-be full and exclusive rights to terminate their little accident(s) at any time up till birth (should it become 'inconvenient' to the lifestyle the potential mom desires, and/or is trying to maintain).

Here are the figures I asked you about, which I'm confident you don't know or really give a rat's azz about.
In 2013, 2014, and 2015 there were 664,000+ 652,000+ and 638,000+ abortions respectively in the US.

I couldn't find stats for after 2015..but I did find one more that's pretty gruesome.
The total # of abortions performed in the US from 1970 to 2015 is 45,789,558-that's a lot of dead children.

Maybe you should STFU and stop making stupid comparisons when your side has obviously been complicit in the death of over 45 million kiddos.. who at one time, most of us agreed, was our most valuable resource-and some of us still do....
Spoken like the true hypocrites all you whiney lib... (show quote)


———————-

2quick,
You should be aware that your numbers include still-born babies and miscarriages; of which there are 10’s of thousands each year, combined. So, the numbers you show don’t reflect the true number of abortions a year. But, hey, presenting false numbers is what so many on your side do to buttress your points of view. Also, you failed to mention that from your own numbers, there a marked decline in the number of your all inclusive “abortions.”

Also, why do you care about aborted babies? You folks couldn’t care less about these babies and their mothers once born. I suppose, too, that no one in your circle of family and friends has had someone that got pregnant out of wedlock. If so, how did you or they handle it? Did you or they excise the expectant mother and her unborn child from the family? If the mother gave birth, was she forced to give-up her baby or allowed to keep it?

You bunch of hypocrites want to force a woman to keep and birth a child irrespective of the mother’s circumstances or even if the baby has a potentially debilitating or fatal deformity. You’re all good to jump up and down, demanding “rights” for someone who might not live through being born, whose birth could kill the mother or would be forced to live a life devoid of a “normal” life.

I suppose that as long as these kinds of circumstances don’t affect you directly, it’s okay for you to force your beliefs on others.

Reply
Jun 5, 2019 23:19:40   #
John King
 
alabuck wrote:
———————-

2quick,
You should be aware that your numbers include still-born babies and miscarriages; of which there are 10’s of thousands each year, combined. So, the numbers you show don’t reflect the true number of abortions a year. But, hey, presenting false numbers is what so many on your side do to buttress your points of view. Also, you failed to mention that from your own numbers, there a marked decline in the number of your all inclusive “abortions.”

Also, why do you care about aborted babies? You folks couldn’t care less about these babies and their mothers once born. I suppose, too, that no one in your circle of family and friends has had someone that got pregnant out of wedlock. If so, how did you or they handle it? Did you or they excise the expectant mother and her unborn child from the family? If the mother gave birth, was she forced to give-up her baby or allowed to keep it?

You bunch of hypocrites want to force a woman to keep and birth a child irrespective of the mother’s circumstances or even if the baby has a potentially debilitating or fatal deformity. You’re all good to jump up and down, demanding “rights” for someone who might not live through being born, whose birth could kill the mother or would be forced to live a life devoid of a “normal” life.

I suppose that as long as these kinds of circumstances don’t affect you directly, it’s okay for you to force your beliefs on others.
———————- br br 2quick, br You should be aware tha... (show quote)


"...I suppose that as long as these kinds of circumstances don’t affect you directly, it’s okay for you to force your beliefs on others..."

Is not the woman seeking an abortion forcing her beliefs on others too (...the unborn child...) ?!?

Reply
Jun 6, 2019 06:36:10   #
Morgan
 
redpill wrote:
Right on! OPP members CANNOT control themselves. I'm getting so f...ing sick of having the scroll through off-topic crap. These trolls need to start their own threads like I HATE TRUMP, or ABORTIONS R US. Good God people, chill.

On topic. The episode sounds fairly ...???... non-threatening as an indoctrination to the age group watching, but that is how indoctrination begins. I say, put such alternative choices at a higher age level where the kids can make informed questions.


When would that be? I think it was tactfully done, little kids watching aren't thinking of sex, all they see are two little animals who love each other and it's done before biases are set in. I think this is blown out of proportion and people are overreacting but that's our society today... drama, drama drama.

Reply
Jun 6, 2019 08:21:27   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Rose42 wrote:
Leave it to parents. Sexual perversion has no place in children’s cartoons


Yep!
When I was a kid, we had Looney Tunes like some of my favorites; Yosemite Sam, Bugs Bunny, Fog Horn Leg Horn, Heckle and Jeckle, Road Runner, Porky Pig, Daffy Duck, Pepe Le Pew and many others.
Just plain funny!!!
No indoctrination going on.

https://youtu.be/mrHLjMTt9gI

Reply
Jun 6, 2019 08:38:10   #
Rose42
 
Morgan wrote:
When would that be? I think it was tactfully done, little kids watching aren't thinking of sex, all they see are two little animals who love each other and it's done before biases are set in. I think this is blown out of proportion and people are overreacting but that's our society today... drama, drama drama.


This is how brainwashing is done. All it needs is a little at a time. This isn't an innocent cartoon. Now they're targeting children.

Reply
Jun 6, 2019 09:06:31   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
Rose42 wrote:
This is how brainwashing is done. All it needs is a little at a time. This isn't an innocent cartoon. Now they're targeting children.


They have been doing it like the transvestite reading to children at the library in full drag they are softly applying images so they consider them normal when they get older parents didn't know about this either

Reply
 
 
Jun 6, 2019 10:19:44   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
bggamers wrote:
They have been doing it like the transvestite reading to children at the library in full drag they are softly applying images so they consider them normal when they get older parents didn't know about this either


Another Liberal Satanic "Jewish"/godless Edomite influence.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.