One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Democrap’s Will Be Decimated In The Upcoming Election
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
May 27, 2019 16:52:21   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
dongreen76 wrote:
If you understand the science of gerrymandering you would know that the electoral college is synonymous with the science of gerrymandering.It goes something like this you rearrange the voting populous districts they live in by taking a democratic district ,attach this to a republic district of a lesser populous,Keeping in mind that when you gerry mander it does not have to be confined merely to containing the voting entity within a same state,Your determination of how many electoral votes within the. voting apparatus of the electoral college comes about due to the fact you have increased your number of votes , hence ,even those voters that vote democratically ,votes are attached to a republican district,hence their votes
have been nullified.Therefore,even though you have a vote that preliminarily leaned one way,they have been annexed to another state or district that has a different political orientation .How do you think a person loses the popular vote but still wins the presidency - also there are other factors to consider,like how many congressional districts you have they may corroborate and will work to get their candidate elected by forming a greater get out the vote apparatus and may increase their representation in the house.
If you understand the science of gerrymandering y... (show quote)


Did someone sell you this bullshit or did you dream it up all on your own? Gerrymandering can be used to influence the outcome of local, state and US House elections. Nothing else. It has no effect on US Senate or Presidential elections. Electoral College votes do not cross state lines.

Reply
May 27, 2019 17:20:12   #
tbutkovich
 
Roughly half the American people could be looking at a gift horse in the mouth and not know what they own Even if they were to own another “Secretariat” they would choose sell it to a supplier who will destroy the horse and turn it into dog food, rather than run it in the Kentucky Derby, Preakness and Belmont with the greatest of odds of winning the triple crown. If the Democraps tell them to sell it, they will turn it over because they cannot comprehend the valuation.

Their inability to recognize the value of what they have (their basic freedoms) and willingness to surrender the control of those freedoms to an unscrupulous government is beyond belief!

Reply
May 27, 2019 22:53:38   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
I don't think America can take much more before we collapse from within.. I am buying more ammo

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2019 22:53:39   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
I don't think America can take much more before we collapse from within.. I am buying more ammo

Reply
May 27, 2019 22:55:56   #
debeda
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
I don't think America can take much more before we collapse from within.. I am buying more ammo


Smart move

Reply
May 28, 2019 07:33:34   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
dongreen76 wrote:
Gerrymandering is the process, you dumb ass of influencing or rearranging people's position geographically so you may change the make up of a voting block to assume a greater number of votes that would be consistent with the order of desired political mandate.When I wrote the damned post I told your dumb ass to keep in mind that if you had a correct comprehension of what the term entails -a rearranging or infuencing of people to change their geographical location so as to achieve a desired political advantage such as assuming a plurality in votes that are consistent with the gerrymanderers political agenda. When I wrote the damn post I told you to keep in mind that you could go out side state and congressional boundaries or districts and are committing the act of gerrymander in it's profoundest since.it goes beyond merely annexing one district to another.The other aspect of the scenario is though mentioned scenario is rather far fetched, Even utilizing the basics of gerrymandering (annexing congressional districts)You can still affect the out come of a presidential election by altering a political districts agenda so that it is for a candidate it originally was not for,by either annexing it within another district with a opposing political agenda,so that's it constituencies votes have been nullified.
You get your electorial votes according to the number of senators,and according to how many congressional delegates you have,how many congressional representatives you have goes according to the population you have in your districts,once again you can change the population of a district by merely tampering with geographical boundaries,or influencing people to shift locations,there by having a profound effect on a presidential election.
Gerrymandering is the process, you dumb ass of inf... (show quote)


This drivel would not be worth a reply, except it isn't often I see such hubris coupled with such monumental ignorance.
Gerrymandering, junior, cannot effect a presidential election because in 48 of the 50 states, all of the states electoral votes go to the presidential candidate who is the winner of the popular vote. 2 Senators, and the population, and the representatives. It does not matter which party the politicians belong to, only the total number. Democrat or Republican. You could have a state with a majority of Republican senators and representatives, but that state's votes would go to a Democrat candidate if that's who won the popular vote.
Did you build scale models when you were young? The last time I saw anyone exhibit your lack of comprehension was a gentleman who had sniffed WAY too much glue as a child.

Reply
May 28, 2019 09:19:13   #
debeda
 
dongreen76 wrote:
Gerrymandering is the process, you dumb ass of influencing or rearranging people's position geographically so you may change the make up of a voting block to assume a greater number of votes that would be consistent with the order of desired political mandate.When I wrote the damned post I told your dumb ass to keep in mind that if you had a correct comprehension of what the term entails -a rearranging or infuencing of people to change their geographical location so as to achieve a desired political advantage such as assuming a plurality in votes that are consistent with the gerrymanderers political agenda. When I wrote the damn post I told you to keep in mind that you could go out side state and congressional boundaries or districts and are committing the act of gerrymander in it's profoundest since.it goes beyond merely annexing one district to another.The other aspect of the scenario is though mentioned scenario is rather far fetched, Even utilizing the basics of gerrymandering (annexing congressional districts)You can still affect the out come of a presidential election by altering a political districts agenda so that it is for a candidate it originally was not for,by either annexing it within another district with a opposing political agenda,so that's it constituencies votes have been nullified.
You get your electorial votes according to the number of senators,and according to how many congressional delegates you have,how many congressional representatives you have goes according to the population you have in your districts,once again you can change the population of a district by merely tampering with geographical boundaries,or influencing people to shift locations,there by having a profound effect on a presidential election.
Gerrymandering is the process, you dumb ass of inf... (show quote)


You're very abusive, Don. And after reading your posts, apparently your preferred insult for males is "dumb ass" and for females is "fat ass". I will say to you again, civilly, that gerrymandering could not possibly have accounted for the preponderance of counties won by President Trump in the 2016 election. If there is any gerrymandering done, it's most certainly in California and New York. Just sayin.

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2019 09:19:34   #
debeda
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
This drivel would not be worth a reply, except it isn't often I see such hubris coupled with such monumental ignorance.
Gerrymandering, junior, cannot effect a presidential election because in 48 of the 50 states, all of the states electoral votes go to the presidential candidate who is the winner of the popular vote. 2 Senators, and the population, and the representatives. It does not matter which party the politicians belong to, only the total number. Democrat or Republican. You could have a state with a majority of Republican senators and representatives, but that state's votes would go to a Democrat candidate if that's who won the popular vote.
Did you build scale models when you were young? The last time I saw anyone exhibit your lack of comprehension was a gentleman who had sniffed WAY too much glue as a child.
This drivel would not be worth a reply, except it ... (show quote)



Reply
May 28, 2019 09:33:48   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
The thing that Mr Reen vehemently hates most is the fact that the "White Vote" is so strong.

Reply
May 28, 2019 09:56:08   #
Fodaoson Loc: South Texas
 
Gerrymandering affects only the House of Representatives only. It does not change the population of a state.
Senators are elected at large.

Reply
May 28, 2019 13:04:38   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
byronglimish wrote:
The thing that Mr Reen vehemently hates most is the fact that the "White Vote" is so strong.


True dat.

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2019 23:16:05   #
dongreen76
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
This drivel would not be worth a reply, except it isn't often I see such hubris coupled with such monumental ignorance.
Gerrymandering, junior, cannot effect a presidential election because in 48 of the 50 states, all of the states electoral votes go to the presidential candidate who is the winner of the popular vote. 2 Senators, and the population, and the representatives. It does not matter which party the politicians belong to, only the total number. Democrat or Republican. You could have a state with a majority of Republican senators and representatives, but that state's votes would go to a Democrat candidate if that's who won the popular vote.
Did you build scale models when you were young? The last time I saw anyone exhibit your lack of comprehension was a gentleman who had sniffed WAY too much glue as a child.
This drivel would not be worth a reply, except it ... (show quote)


Since you are breaking out with the "YOU PEOPLE "s_ _ _ this conversation is over.In my many years and dealings with "YOU PEOPLE",I have learned it is a shear waste of time to perpetually debate with "YOU PEOPLE" being UH ! THE GODS !can never be wrong..... you lil`ole supremacist you
.

Reply
May 28, 2019 23:24:04   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
dongreen76 wrote:
Since you are breaking out with the "YOU PEOPLE "s_ _ _ this conversation is over.In my many years and dealings with "YOU PEOPLE",I have learned it is a shear waste of time to perpetually debate with "YOU PEOPLE" being UH ! THE GODS !can never be wrong..... you lil`ole supremacist you
.


You are correct. You could spend that wasted debating time doing something productive; like learning how to spell and punctuate.

Reply
May 28, 2019 23:25:50   #
debeda
 
dongreen76 wrote:
Gerrymandering is the process, you dumb ass of influencing or rearranging people's position geographically so you may change the make up of a voting block to assume a greater number of votes that would be consistent with the order of desired political mandate.When I wrote the damned post I told your dumb ass to keep in mind that if you had a correct comprehension of what the term entails -a rearranging or infuencing of people to change their geographical location so as to achieve a desired political advantage such as assuming a plurality in votes that are consistent with the gerrymanderers political agenda. When I wrote the damn post I told you to keep in mind that you could go out side state and congressional boundaries or districts and are committing the act of gerrymander in it's profoundest since.it goes beyond merely annexing one district to another.The other aspect of the scenario is though mentioned scenario is rather far fetched, Even utilizing the basics of gerrymandering (annexing congressional districts)You can still affect the out come of a presidential election by altering a political districts agenda so that it is for a candidate it originally was not for,by either annexing it within another district with a opposing political agenda,so that's it constituencies votes have been nullified.
You get your electorial votes according to the number of senators,and according to how many congressional delegates you have,how many congressional representatives you have goes according to the population you have in your districts,once again you can change the population of a district by merely tampering with geographical boundaries,or influencing people to shift locations,there by having a profound effect on a presidential election.
Gerrymandering is the process, you dumb ass of inf... (show quote)


This one's for you, Don



Reply
May 28, 2019 23:43:30   #
dongreen76
 
[quote=debeda]You're very abusive, Don. And after reading your posts, apparently your preferred insult for males is "dumb ass" and for females is "fat ass". I will say to you again, civilly, that gerrymandering could not possibly have accounted for the preponderance of counties won by President Trump in the 2016 election. If there is any gerrymandering done, it's most certainly in California and New York. Just sayin.[/quote
Every man of color would become impatient and insultful of "YOU PEOPLE;" you bare insulting.All the debasement ,and marginalizing perjortive shit you have done throughout all the civilized eras.You are being typically passive aggressive in stating that "if there was any gerrymandering going on it was only in the liberal states of California and New York,conservitive Republicans,don't gerrymander - huh,? just to give you an example of what 'YOU PEOPLES" mischief consist of -so I really don't give a damned what you ,"YOU PEOPLE"say-by the way ,they having been gerrymandering on a local level for ages - any fool knows it has an effect on state wide elections, munincipal elections,as well as county elections ,on up to presidential elections with no intention of effecting a future election, but only to serve the agenda of that particular gerrymanderer at that particular time. Have you been reading the post of the opposing view points other than mine,I doubt it,not with what you said,-talk about insults,talk about insulting,whew boy,I didn't know such `Krazy` A_ _ bigots exist...just sayin`

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.