One of the nation’s most popular eateries is under attack in California, where otherwise “tolerant” “social justice warriors” are foaming at the mouth.
Flag And Cross
As you may have guessed, we are once again witnessing a financial attack on popular chicken restaurant Chick-fil-A over the religious views of the company’s President. This time, however, there are real concerns over exactly how this decision will impact our inalienable right to religious freedom.
Faculty at California Polytechnic State University recently voted to ban Chick-fil-A from campus, accusing the restaurant’s charity arm of being “in violation of our values” and suggesting that Chick-fil-A’s presence on campus is similar to having pornography or a Hooters establishment at the school. The university president, however, is expected to veto the faculty vote.
Trending: [LISTEN CLOSELY] Rashida Tlaib Has ‘A Calming Feeling’ When Thinking of the Holocaust
Cal Poly’s Academic Senate voted overwhelmingly in favor of blacklisting a Chick-fil-A restaurant from the school’s San Luis Obispo campus, due to the company’s owner supposedly having a “perceived opposition to the LGBTQ community,” according to KCBX News.
One of the proponents of the ban made several incendiary statements regarding Chick-fil-A, including comparing the restaurant to pornography.
Thomas Gutierrez, the Academic Senate’s vice-chair who introduced the resolution, compared Chick-fil-A to pornography and Hooters in his attempt to explain why the fast-food restaurant was not welcomed on campus, according to a report by Mustang News.
“We don’t sell pornography in the bookstore and we don’t have a Hooters on campus,” said Gutierrez, “We already pre-select those kind of things based on our existing values — this is a similar thing. The difference is we’re actually profiting from this. So our money, every dollar a student is spending at Chick-fil-A, is going to these causes that are in violation of our values.”
In a strikingly oxymoronic bit of “logic”, Gutierrez went on to tout the university’s commitment to “diversity and inclusion”.
And while all of this anger and vitriol certainly gave Gutierrez something to rage about, it appears as though the vote to ban Chick-fil-A will remain a symbolic one.
After the vote to blacklist Chick-fil-A, the resolution was reportedly sent to Cal Poly president Jeffery Armstrong, who will then make the final decision.
“Nevertheless, I think it’s important to go into the public record that the faculty feel this way on this fairly timely issue,” said Gutierrez, acknowledging President Armstrong’s apparent decision to keep Chick-fil-A on campus.
Now, don't tell me that the "progressives" in particularly the LGBTQandwhatever crowd is not against Christians.
no propaganda please wrote:
One of the nation’s most popular eateries is under attack in California, where otherwise “tolerant” “social justice warriors” are foaming at the mouth.
Flag And Cross
As you may have guessed, we are once again witnessing a financial attack on popular chicken restaurant Chick-fil-A over the religious views of the company’s President. This time, however, there are real concerns over exactly how this decision will impact our inalienable right to religious freedom.
Faculty at California Polytechnic State University recently voted to ban Chick-fil-A from campus, accusing the restaurant’s charity arm of being “in violation of our values” and suggesting that Chick-fil-A’s presence on campus is similar to having pornography or a Hooters establishment at the school. The university president, however, is expected to veto the faculty vote.
Trending: [LISTEN CLOSELY] Rashida Tlaib Has ‘A Calming Feeling’ When Thinking of the Holocaust
Cal Poly’s Academic Senate voted overwhelmingly in favor of blacklisting a Chick-fil-A restaurant from the school’s San Luis Obispo campus, due to the company’s owner supposedly having a “perceived opposition to the LGBTQ community,” according to KCBX News.
One of the proponents of the ban made several incendiary statements regarding Chick-fil-A, including comparing the restaurant to pornography.
Thomas Gutierrez, the Academic Senate’s vice-chair who introduced the resolution, compared Chick-fil-A to pornography and Hooters in his attempt to explain why the fast-food restaurant was not welcomed on campus, according to a report by Mustang News.
“We don’t sell pornography in the bookstore and we don’t have a Hooters on campus,” said Gutierrez, “We already pre-select those kind of things based on our existing values — this is a similar thing. The difference is we’re actually profiting from this. So our money, every dollar a student is spending at Chick-fil-A, is going to these causes that are in violation of our values.”
In a strikingly oxymoronic bit of “logic”, Gutierrez went on to tout the university’s commitment to “diversity and inclusion”.
And while all of this anger and vitriol certainly gave Gutierrez something to rage about, it appears as though the vote to ban Chick-fil-A will remain a symbolic one.
After the vote to blacklist Chick-fil-A, the resolution was reportedly sent to Cal Poly president Jeffery Armstrong, who will then make the final decision.
“Nevertheless, I think it’s important to go into the public record that the faculty feel this way on this fairly timely issue,” said Gutierrez, acknowledging President Armstrong’s apparent decision to keep Chick-fil-A on campus.
Now, don't tell me that the "progressives" in particularly the LGBTQandwhatever crowd is not against Christians.
One of the nation’s most popular eateries is under... (
show quote)
Christians and Christian branding are becoming more and more
unpopular!I believe the position of unpopularity and antipathy regarding this restuarant and its Christian branding began as a stand against the
bigotry and persecution in the public sphere, not Christianity, per se, that many women and those in the LGBTQ community felt, in response to the chicken restuarant's desire to curtail or deny legally mandated medical/insurance benefits.
no propaganda please wrote:
One of the nation’s most popular eateries is under attack in California, where otherwise “tolerant” “social justice warriors” are foaming at the mouth.
Flag And Cross
As you may have guessed, we are once again witnessing a financial attack on popular chicken restaurant Chick-fil-A over the religious views of the company’s President. This time, however, there are real concerns over exactly how this decision will impact our inalienable right to religious freedom.
Faculty at California Polytechnic State University recently voted to ban Chick-fil-A from campus, accusing the restaurant’s charity arm of being “in violation of our values” and suggesting that Chick-fil-A’s presence on campus is similar to having pornography or a Hooters establishment at the school. The university president, however, is expected to veto the faculty vote.
Trending: [LISTEN CLOSELY] Rashida Tlaib Has ‘A Calming Feeling’ When Thinking of the Holocaust
Cal Poly’s Academic Senate voted overwhelmingly in favor of blacklisting a Chick-fil-A restaurant from the school’s San Luis Obispo campus, due to the company’s owner supposedly having a “perceived opposition to the LGBTQ community,” according to KCBX News.
One of the proponents of the ban made several incendiary statements regarding Chick-fil-A, including comparing the restaurant to pornography.
Thomas Gutierrez, the Academic Senate’s vice-chair who introduced the resolution, compared Chick-fil-A to pornography and Hooters in his attempt to explain why the fast-food restaurant was not welcomed on campus, according to a report by Mustang News.
“We don’t sell pornography in the bookstore and we don’t have a Hooters on campus,” said Gutierrez, “We already pre-select those kind of things based on our existing values — this is a similar thing. The difference is we’re actually profiting from this. So our money, every dollar a student is spending at Chick-fil-A, is going to these causes that are in violation of our values.”
In a strikingly oxymoronic bit of “logic”, Gutierrez went on to tout the university’s commitment to “diversity and inclusion”.
And while all of this anger and vitriol certainly gave Gutierrez something to rage about, it appears as though the vote to ban Chick-fil-A will remain a symbolic one.
After the vote to blacklist Chick-fil-A, the resolution was reportedly sent to Cal Poly president Jeffery Armstrong, who will then make the final decision.
“Nevertheless, I think it’s important to go into the public record that the faculty feel this way on this fairly timely issue,” said Gutierrez, acknowledging President Armstrong’s apparent decision to keep Chick-fil-A on campus.
Now, don't tell me that the "progressives" in particularly the LGBTQandwhatever crowd is not against Christians.
One of the nation’s most popular eateries is under... (
show quote)
Cal Poly isn't the only university to ban Chick-Fil-A--or however you spell it. And it has absolutely NOTHING to do with Christianity. It has to do with the business supporting discrimination against a sizable segment of American citizens.
kemmer wrote:
Cal Poly isn't the only university to ban Chick-Fil-A--or however you spell it. And it has absolutely NOTHING to do with Christianity. It has to do with the business supporting discrimination against a sizable segment of American citizens.
That is, at best, a mistatment, more likely an intentional lie. Chic Fil A hires competent workers, no mater which sex, or what is their sexual attraction. And they serve any well behaved customers with the money to buy their products. The owners donate to Christian groups, as is their right. I expect they would not serve anyone who misbehaved, was seriously obscene , or disturbed the other customers. What the progressives demand is that the owners never donate to Christian organizations. I am actually surprised surprised that they don't pressure the owners into donating to LGBTQ causes, perhaps even have a gender mixed up person reading to the children at a number of sites.
no propaganda please wrote:
What the progressives demand is that the owners never donate to Christian organizations.
As you well know, some “Christian” organizations are little more than hate groups hiding behind the cross.
kemmer wrote:
As you well know, some “Christian” organizations are little more than hate groups hiding behind the cross.
I would expect there are a few churches that preach hate. The Liberation theology for Rev Wright where Obama went for years is certainly one of them. I did encounter a church in Louisiana that was a KKK front, it had 35 members last I heard, a bunch of old men more interested in drinking than anything else according to people I knew in the area.
Singularity wrote:
Christians and Christian branding are becoming more and more unpopular!
I believe the position of unpopularity and antipathy regarding this restuarant and its Christian branding began as a stand against the bigotry and persecution in the public sphere, not Christianity, per se, that many women and those in the LGBTQ community felt, in response to the chicken restuarant's desire to curtail or deny legally mandated medical/insurance benefits.
Christians are associated with unconstitutional anti abortion actions in red states, the extreme side of this is against birth control as well, which is purely idiotic.
kemmer wrote:
As you well know, some “Christian” organizations are little more than hate groups hiding behind the cross.
It is dangerous to associate the "some" extremists that are tied to any group, that is what the right does as far as muslim terrorists...the terrorist element does not represent the majority of muslims.
kemmer wrote:
As you well know, some “Christian” organizations are little more than hate groups hiding behind the cross.
Given that one third (1/3) of the world population are Christians, whoever or whatever these Christian hate groups may be, they are a minor nuisance, like a toxic weed in a giant forest.
Groups like the Westboro Baptists (40 members) and the Army of God (10 dissociated leaders) and all other Christian extremist groups combined represent far less than 1% of the total Christian population.
And, what about LGBT activists? Are they not hate groups?
no propaganda please wrote:
I would expect there are a few churches that preach hate. The Liberation theology for Rev Wright where Obama went for years is certainly one of them. I did encounter a church in Louisiana that was a KKK front, it had 35 members last I heard, a bunch of old men more interested in drinking than anything else according to people I knew in the area.
==================
Talk about Obama's friend Farrakhan. He does not talk about God. He talks about violence against God and His people. That is why Islam is not a religion. It is a theology of hatred and violence. Get them out of here please.
woodguru wrote:
It is dangerous to associate the "some" extremists that are tied to any group, that is what the right does as far as muslim terrorists...the terrorist element does not represent the majority of muslims.
=================
All Muslims have one common goal. Follow the command of their god to kill all infidels unless they submit to him. When their fellow Islam do that, the left few keep quiet. They allow them to happen.
95% of them celebrated and rejoiced over their victory of the 9/11 terror bombings. It was over the world.
No one among them, you called non-violent dared to condemn their violent behavior. They tolerate that all the time.
Radiance3 wrote:
==================
That is why Islam is not a religion. It is a theology of hatred and violence.
Some would say Christianity is also all about hatred an violence, considering all the burnings at the stake and genocidal religious wars fought in its name.
Radiance3 wrote:
=================
All Muslims have one common goal. Follow the command of their god to kill all infidels unless they submit to him. When their fellow Islam do that, the left few keep quiet. They allow them to happen.
95% of them celebrated and rejoiced over their victory of the 9/11 terror bombings. It was over the world.
No one among them, you called non-violent dared to condemn their violent behavior. They tolerate that all the time.
Hahahahaha..... You yourself might qualify as a hate group!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.