One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The woman who exposed Elijah Cummings!!!
Apr 4, 2019 02:56:38   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QI-z5DwcAZM

Reply
Apr 4, 2019 06:07:05   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
proud republican wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QI-z5DwcAZM


Impeach that impudent spook.



Reply
Apr 4, 2019 06:17:53   #
LIto54-60
 
LOL. !!!! UNHINGED 💪🏿🙄🙄

Reply
 
 
Apr 4, 2019 07:51:56   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
Impeach that impudent spook.


Your racist slurs may be protected by free speech, but they are totally uncalled for and are despicable.

Elijah Cummings is a slime ball because he's a liberal overreaching politician. It has nothing to do with the amount of melanin in his skin.

Reply
Apr 4, 2019 09:13:39   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
TommyRadd wrote:
Your racist slurs may be protected by free speech, but they are totally uncalled for and are despicable.

Elijah Cummings is a slime ball because he's a liberal overreaching politician. It has nothing to do with the amount of melanin in his skin.


Don't let the word spook get your panties in a wad .

Calling him a "slime ball" doesn't make you any less despicable.......... Goober .

Reply
Apr 4, 2019 10:19:18   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
Don't let the word spook get your panties in a wad .

Calling him a "slime ball" doesn't make you any less despicable.......... Goober .


Apparently you’re not smart enough to understand the difference. Let me try and explain it to you: Elijah Cummings can’t change his skin color, but he is a slime ball by choice.

Reply
Apr 4, 2019 10:46:31   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
TommyRadd wrote:
Apparently you’re not smart enough to understand the difference. Let me try and explain it to you: Elijah Cummings can’t change his skin color, but he is a slime ball by choice.


His skin color has nothing to do with him being a spook.

Apparently you're too blindly indoctrinated to understand that the word 'spook' has a literal definition and may be used as a verb in describing anything or anyone that is unnerving.

Do I need to refer you to a dictionary or does that cut some slack in your panty wad ?

https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-verizon&ei=bhimXObgB9CsswXg3IPQAg&q=spook&oq=spook&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.1.0.35i39i70i249j0i131j46i131j0i131j46l2j0i131l2.14786.19044..22710...1.0..0.143.1409.5j8......0....1.......8..0i71j0j0i67j35i39j0i20i263.rGdcqchLuiw

Reply
 
 
Apr 4, 2019 11:17:26   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
His skin color has nothing to do with him being a spook.

Apparently you're too blindly indoctrinated to understand that the word 'spook' has a literal definition and may be used as a verb in describing anything or anyone that is unnerving.

Do I need to refer you to a dictionary or does that cut some slack in your panty wad ?

https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-verizon&ei=bhimXObgB9CsswXg3IPQAg&q=spook&oq=spook&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.1.0.35i39i70i249j0i131j46i131j0i131j46l2j0i131l2.14786.19044..22710...1.0..0.143.1409.5j8......0....1.......8..0i71j0j0i67j35i39j0i20i263.rGdcqchLuiw
His skin color has nothing to do with him being a ... (show quote)


In that case, my apologies. My cultural experience has seen this word used as a slur against black folks, and that is the way in which I assumed you were intending it. I stand corrected and thank you for pointing that out.

Update: wiki bears out that “spook” is “A racial slur for a black person”:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spook

Reply
Apr 5, 2019 09:33:58   #
bahmer
 
LIto54-60 wrote:
LOL. !!!! UNHINGED 💪🏿🙄🙄


Amen and Amen

Reply
Apr 5, 2019 11:15:08   #
tommsteyer
 
Cummings was a stooge of the Clinton's. He probably exposed himself.

Reply
Apr 5, 2019 11:51:18   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
TommyRadd wrote:
Your racist slurs may be protected by free speech, but they are totally uncalled for and are despicable.

Elijah Cummings is a slime ball because he's a liberal overreaching politician. It has nothing to do with the amount of melanin in his skin.


Why is it acceptable to use "white" in referring to certain behavior but not "black?" For every 1,000,000 reference to white racism one might hear only one comment directed at black racism. We're supposed to be sensitized to understanding and tolerating black racism. Why is it that practically all races and nationalities have been enslaved but American Blacks are the only people who can't move past it? I know the answer.

Reply
 
 
Apr 5, 2019 12:02:02   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
padremike wrote:
Why is it acceptable to use "white" in referring to certain behavior but not "black?" For every 1,000,000 reference to white racism one might hear only one comment directed at black racism. We're supposed to be sensitized to understanding and tolerating black racism. Why is it that practically all races and nationalities have been enslaved but American Blacks are the only people who can't move past it? I know the answer.


I think I know the answer also. I believe it is racism against whites. What is your answer?

Reply
Apr 5, 2019 15:15:54   #
maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
 
proud republican wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QI-z5DwcAZM


Why doe this not surprise me? As I said in another post, piss on the power mongers...the FBI, the IRS, the DOJ...these agencies are a joke compared to what they USED to be. These are the people who are supposed to be protecting the citizens they are intimidating. Scrape the scum off of the top and restore honesty and trust to these powerful agencies.

Reply
Apr 5, 2019 16:04:17   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
TommyRadd wrote:
I think I know the answer also. I believe it is racism against whites. What is your answer?


The answer, I believe, goes to the way the problem was presented by President Lyndon Johnson when he declared war on poverty. The message went out that the poor were unable to extricate themselves from their plight. In a speech at Howard University in 1965, LBJ told black students they were the victims of society's oppression and racism and that the government was responsible to rescue them.

LBJ, his compatriots in Congress, and the socially conscious elites who championed the war on poverty, were well intentioned. They really believed that institutional programs would solve poverty. Unfortunately, trillions of failed dollars later, proved they continued to remain very convincing. Up until that time the work ethic had been strong amongst the inner city minorities. Now it all changed. "If my condition is not my doing", minorities now reasoned, "then why work hard to get out of it?" And if society is at fault then why not take from society? Why not let society support me? After all, I'm a victim of society. Democrats unintentionally struck a human gold mind.

As long as anyone thinks they're victims, they will never get up and make something of themselves. The people who get on in this world are the people who get up and look for the circumstances they want, and if they can't find them, they make them. They're not victims but that's exactly what the Great Society created.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.