One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
New brain rotting disease infects right wingers
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
Mar 5, 2019 00:42:43   #
debeda
 
Rose42 wrote:
It's fed to both. The left is every bit as susceptible. What's interesting too is Google ( who owns YouTube) and Facebook regularly censor but the left doesn't seem to mind. That's dangerous.

While some on the left rail against the right for not seeing facts (true in too many cases) they are unwilling or unable to see the very gradual encroachments on our rights. They also have no problem with MSM left bias while at the same time criticizing right biased sites.

The infection is widespread.
It's fed to both. The left is every bit as suscept... (show quote)


Good points. Rose

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 02:17:07   #
DogLover99
 
Kevyn wrote:
large swaths of America appear to be suffering from a debilitating condition known as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Derangement Syndrome (AOCDS). Symptoms include bouts of extreme condescension, an inability to stop sputtering the word “socialist”, and overwhelming anger that a young woman of colour is unapologetically succeeding.


Isn't she the one that proudly defines herself as a Democrat Socialist? What the right wingers don't like
about AOC is, she doesn't have a clue about what she is talking about. She opens her mouth and incerts
her foot almost everyday. DUMB AS A ROCK!

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 04:30:04   #
John King
 
Large swaths of America appear to be suffering from a debilitating condition known as Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS). Symptoms include bouts of extreme condescension, an inability to stop sputtering the words “Nazi” or "Racist" among many others, and an overwhelming anger that an old white privileged man is unapologetically succeeding.

Amazing how a few words changed here and there reveal another truth about those who just can't accept Donald Trump as President . . . not your President or my President, but simply as THE President!!!

Perhaps it's time to stop trying to shut him down with all these ridiculous hearings in Congress and get to work on the business we sent them to DC to deal with . . . there is no Russia/Trump collusion and the FBI is going to set this question to rest once and for all! Get to work Congress!!!

By the way, AOC's Green New Deal is undependable . . . funding it is virtually impossible!

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 04:40:15   #
John King
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Yes, it is often pointed out that there is bias in right wing reporting, primarily because the right refuses to acknowledge any facts presented from anything "MSM" regardless of how factual it may be with the excuse of "liberal bias" all the while believing everything coming from right wing media sites/television. I have yet to spot "liberal MSM" supporting conspiracy theories, and while there may be right wing sites/television news that doesn't support/validate conspiracy theories and/or strongly loaded wording, they are few and far between, thus far I have only found one that I feel confident enough to trust, http://thehill.com, and one that I can read/watch but MUST confirm anything they claim, Fox news and their website.

While "liberal MSM" may be left leaning, I have rarely found cases where their facts were incorrect, there were some times, but that happens with EVERY media source REGARDLESS of that media source's leanings. Bias can be ignored, we don't have to take in the bias within the news, invalid "facts" are the largest problem with biased media and while there are some trustworthy conservative news sites, I am unaware of any trustworthy conservative television/cable television news channels.

By trustworthy I of course mean that they do a good job sourcing their facts and do not deliberately take facts out of context and/or misrepresent the facts to put them into a skewed perspective. Choosing to NOT report certain stories, I am sure both sides do that (I actually KNOW they both do) to some extent either to make room for more important news or because they just don't care to cover/show it. A story not shown just has to be ferreted out elsewhere, no harm, no foul. A falsely reported story however, that can cause harm or a misinformed viewer, which is quite harmful. That is why I tend to veer away from media sources that I don't consider "trustworthy", to stay clear of their misinformation.

If conservative media sources would STOP passing off conspiracy theories as the truth, they would be considered more trustworthy, if they were to stop trying to skew perspective with taking facts out of context and/or choosing to spin the facts with deliberately loaded words meant to steer our emotions, they would be considered more trustworthy. Basically, just report the facts WITHOUT spin and let us make of these facts what we will.

I find that Conservative media, anything they report on that they choose to disagree with (typically if promoted by a Democrat), they choose wording to stimulate the fear and/or the anger emotions in their viewers, anytime they report on something they agree with, they tend to use wording that is aimed at stimulating the happier emotions. Pay attention the next time you watch or read a report that may be partisan from a conservative media source and pay close attention to the wording, pay close attention to how the wording makes you feel. If you are at all honest with yourself, you will see it. It is in the wording, the body language and the tonality of their voices. The body language and tonality only applies to video news of course, they don't come through in text based news.
Yes, it is often pointed out that there is bias in... (show quote)


The way the MSM has been continually seeking anything to bad mouth President Trump, how they will not let go of the Russia/Trump collusion theory . . . makes themselves out to be as fake as Trump has always said! How virtually the entire MSM has done the same thing to Trump smells to high heaven that they have all conspired to tear down the President if it take 4 years or 8!!!

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 09:38:49   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Kevyn wrote:
large swaths of America appear to be suffering from a debilitating condition known as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Derangement Syndrome (AOCDS). Symptoms include bouts of extreme condescension, an inability to stop sputtering the word “socialist”, and overwhelming anger that a young woman of colour is unapologetically succeeding.


Funny!!!!!
Democrats remind me of children's come backs!!!! LOLOLOLOL

"I know you are, but what am I?"

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 10:50:31   #
debeda
 
DogLover99 wrote:
Isn't she the one that proudly defines herself as a Democrat Socialist? What the right wingers don't like
about AOC is, she doesn't have a clue about what she is talking about. She opens her mouth and incerts
her foot almost everyday. DUMB AS A ROCK!


Ya know, watching her (ocasio cortez) is a lot like watching Pee Wee Herman. Weird, often unsightly, but so amusing and perplexing to see what the next weird action/word will pop out of it

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 15:50:20   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
John King wrote:
The way the MSM has been continually seeking anything to bad mouth President Trump, how they will not let go of the Russia/Trump collusion theory . . . makes themselves out to be as fake as Trump has always said! How virtually the entire MSM has done the same thing to Trump smells to high heaven that they have all conspired to tear down the President if it take 4 years or 8!!!


And right wing media doesn't do the same thing you are accusing MSM of? As I have pointed out time and again, yes, the left might leave off relevant stories at times that might make Trump look good maybe, yes, they do point out the things trump says/does that look very bad , they shouldn't be blamed for pointing out his flubs but rather praised for having the courage to do so, unlike right wing media.

The very things you accuse MSM of the right wing media does and far worse, they don't think it is good enough to "out" the mis-steps of Democrats, they feel it necessary to demonize them as well, using loaded language meant to sway emotions and completely rip into every Democrats every mis-step like rabid wolves devouring their latest kill (with some exceptions of course, namely, https://thehill.com). At least MSM has the decency to back off the loaded language and just present the facts (with some exceptions of course, namely CNN and MSNBC I think I have heard).

Until the right wing media sources for the most part meet up with the majority of the MSM on their journalistic standards and integrity, I will continue to back MSM over right wing media. Media should present the facts (preferably ALL the facts but I digress, both sides are guilty of story suppression I hear) and ONLY the facts, leave the loaded language, body language and tonality of voice cues out of it. We do not need nor want opinions forced down our throats. We also don't want propaganda/conspiracy theories either. Just present the facts and keep the opinions to yourselves if you want to be taken as a serious journalist.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 16:44:27   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
And right wing media doesn't do the same thing you are accusing MSM of? As I have pointed out time and again, yes, the left might leave off relevant stories at times that might make Trump look good maybe, yes, they do point out the things trump says/does that look very bad , they shouldn't be blamed for pointing out his flubs but rather praised for having the courage to do so, unlike right wing media.

The very things you accuse MSM of the right wing media does and far worse, they don't think it is good enough to "out" the mis-steps of Democrats, they feel it necessary to demonize them as well, using loaded language meant to sway emotions and completely rip into every Democrats every mis-step like rabid wolves devouring their latest kill (with some exceptions of course, namely, https://thehill.com). At least MSM has the decency to back off the loaded language and just present the facts (with some exceptions of course, namely CNN and MSNBC I think I have heard).

Until the right wing media sources for the most part meet up with the majority of the MSM on their journalistic standards and integrity, I will continue to back MSM over right wing media. Media should present the facts (preferably ALL the facts but I digress, both sides are guilty of story suppression I hear) and ONLY the facts, leave the loaded language, body language and tonality of voice cues out of it. We do not need nor want opinions forced down our throats. We also don't want propaganda/conspiracy theories either. Just present the facts and keep the opinions to yourselves if you want to be taken as a serious journalist.
And right wing media doesn't do the same thing you... (show quote)


"Until the right wing media sources for the most part meet up with the majority of the MSM on their journalistic standards and integrity, I will continue to back MSM over right wing media" - Common Sense Matters

We have FOX Cable News, the only semi-conservative News station up against the all the liberal stations; (ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, CNN and PBS)
No wonder liberals are so mis-informed and ignorant.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 17:30:41   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
eagleye13 wrote:
"Until the right wing media sources for the most part meet up with the majority of the MSM on their journalistic standards and integrity, I will continue to back MSM over right wing media" - Common Sense Matters

We have FOX Cable News, the only semi-conservative News station up against the all the liberal stations; (ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, CNN and PBS)
No wonder liberals are so mis-informed and ignorant.


Actually, there are two more conservative cable television networks and the majority of the news programming on PBS as well. Of those I think PBS is likely to be the most accurate of the 4 televised sources (I am counting ALL of fox network channels as one). OAN and blazetv are the other two. Clarification, Blazetv appears to be internet based at least for now.


Edit: The majority of PBS news programming have a right wing slant and is supported by conservative funding, claiming PBS news programming is left leaning is inaccurate, there may be a few examples of left leaning but the majority is supported by conservative funding and have a right wing slant.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 17:41:16   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Actually, there are two more conservative cable television networks and the majority of the news programming on PBS as well. Of those I think PBS is likely to be the most accurate of the 4 televised sources (I am counting ALL of fox network channels as one). OAN and blazetv are the other two. Clarification, Blazetv appears to be internet based at least for now.


Edit: The majority of PBS news programming have a right wing slant and is supported by conservative funding, claiming PBS news programming is left leaning is inaccurate, there may be a few examples of left leaning but the majority is supported by conservative funding and have a right wing slant.
Actually, there are two more conservative cable te... (show quote)


OAN is great, but many people do not get that channel. I have it on Direct satellite. My local cable (Specttrom)does not include it on the basic package.

Reply
Mar 5, 2019 17:44:24   #
John King
 
It's funny how everything you said can be changed a bit by replacing certain words . . . and BAM . . . you sound like a devout Trump Supporter!!!

The truth is both ilk are just the same in their tactics . . . the liberal, PC snowflakes and the conservative hounds of self-righteousness . . . both are different sides of the same coin! To take the masses to the ultimate goal of a New World Order! Bush Sr. did it, Bill Clinton did it, Bush Jr. did it, and Obama did it . . . switching from Republican to Democrat to Republican to Democrat . . . same outcome! America is on a fast-tract to becoming something so far from what was dreamed of by Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and and even George Washington . . that they would turn to uncontrollable weeping as they rolled over in their graves.

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2019 17:48:38   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
John King wrote:
It's funny how everything you said can be changed a bit by replacing certain words . . . and BAM . . . you sound like a devout Trump Supporter!!!

The truth is both ilk are just the same in their tactics . . . the liberal, PC snowflakes and the conservative hounds of self-righteousness . . . both are different sides of the same coin! To take the masses to the ultimate goal of a New World Order! Bush Sr. did it, Bill Clinton did it, Bush Jr. did it, and Obama did it . . . switching from Republican to Democrat to Republican to Democrat . . . same outcome! America is on a fast-tract to becoming something so far from what was dreamed of by Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and and even George Washington . . that they would turn to uncontrollable weeping as they rolled over in their graves.
It's funny how everything you said can be changed ... (show quote)


Right on. We have had "two" elitist bought parties serving the same cabal.
Trump beat em out.
Now we need to get rid of RINOS as well as Democrats.

Reply
Mar 6, 2019 04:32:56   #
maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
And right wing media doesn't do the same thing you are accusing MSM of? As I have pointed out time and again, yes, the left might leave off relevant stories at times that might make Trump look good maybe, yes, they do point out the things trump says/does that look very bad , they shouldn't be blamed for pointing out his flubs but rather praised for having the courage to do so, unlike right wing media.

The very things you accuse MSM of the right wing media does and far worse, they don't think it is good enough to "out" the mis-steps of Democrats, they feel it necessary to demonize them as well, using loaded language meant to sway emotions and completely rip into every Democrats every mis-step like rabid wolves devouring their latest kill (with some exceptions of course, namely, https://thehill.com). At least MSM has the decency to back off the loaded language and just present the facts (with some exceptions of course, namely CNN and MSNBC I think I have heard).

Until the right wing media sources for the most part meet up with the majority of the MSM on their journalistic standards and integrity, I will continue to back MSM over right wing media. Media should present the facts (preferably ALL the facts but I digress, both sides are guilty of story suppression I hear) and ONLY the facts, leave the loaded language, body language and tonality of voice cues out of it. We do not need nor want opinions forced down our throats. We also don't want propaganda/conspiracy theories either. Just present the facts and keep the opinions to yourselves if you want to be taken as a serious journalist.
And right wing media doesn't do the same thing you... (show quote)





According to the attached chart there are 7 conservative(or right wing) news agencies or programs, while there are 27 liberal(or left wing) news agencies or programs. so the 7 would have to lie 3.57 times as much as the 27 just to break even.
Plus, what you are accusing Fox of doing is exactly what CNN and MSNBC, at least, do all the time. They make fun of his hair, his skin color, the size of his hands, indirectly the size of his penis, his so called lack of presidential expertise, what he likes to eat, his wife, ( shoes, dialect, dresses, coats, where she came from), and his son, ( the rumors of autism or mental deficiency). Isn't it odd that a Harvard Media Study found that Fox's coverage of Trump was 80% negative while CNN's and NBC's Trump coverage was 93% negative (at least that's what my research told me). So I'm just having difficulty understanding your complaint.

As far as integerty goes, the following list shows that CNN at least has NO integerty at all;

— The most recent example of CNN story fabrication involved Anthony Scaramuci, a member of Trump’s transition team, as well as a a fundraiser and advisor for his campaign. The network published an unsubstantiated story from an “anonymous” source claiming that Scaramuci was under congressional investigation by the Senate for allegedly discussing sanctions with Kirill Dmitriev, chief executive of the $10 billion Russian Direct Investment Fund just four days before the president’s inauguration. It didn’t happen; CNN was forced to retract the story.

The Trump hate at CNN started long before this week, however:

— August 10, 2016: CNN reported that the Secret Service spoke to the Trump campaign about the then-GOP nominee’s comment regarding the Second Amendment. He said: “Hillary wants to abolish — essentially abolish the Second Amendment. By the way, if she gets to pick, if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know.” It was misconstrued (intentionally) to suggest Trump was calling for armed rebellion against Clinton if she won and began appointing Left-wing Supreme Court justices. It didn’t happen.

— September 29, 2016: The network reported that talk radio shock jock Howard Stern said Trump expressed support for the Iraq war on his show in 2002. Stern later denied the CNN report and said he doesn’t know “how CNN came up with” it’s headline that Stern “confirmed” Trump’s support. Trump denied it.

— October 2016: Network Leftie host Chris Cuomo, in riffing on WikiLeaks’ steady release of damning emails about Trump’s rival, Hillary Clinton, told his audience it was illegal for ordinary folks to view those documents, so people would have to rely only on the media to tell them what’s in them (or not tell them). A noted legal expert debunked Cuomo.

— October 30, 2016: The network accused Trump of “encouraging” voters to cast more than one ballot, because he voiced skepticism of mail-in ballots (check the URL of this website, which syndicated the original CNN story, and you can see what the initial headline said). Not true, and the network eventually rewrote the headline and added an editor’s note at the bottom of the original story, claiming the change “more accurately” reflected Trump’s real comments.

— November 22, 2016: During a daytime broadcast, CNN contributor Charles Kaiser claimed that Trump “should never ask his supporters to give the Nazi salute, which he did at a rally in March. That’s not a good idea…” When challenged, he added, “In March he asked his supporters to raise and pledge their support to his candidacy and pledge their support for him. There’s plenty of video of that.” Except, that is not what Trump was doing, calling it ridiculous.

— January 20, 2017: On Inauguration Day, the Trump transition team utilized an old Frank Sinatra hit, “My Way,” in some festivities. CNN reported that his daughter, Nancy Sinatra, of “These Boots Are Made For Walkin’” fame, was not happy about it. She tweeted out later, “That’s not true. I never said that. Why do you lie CNN?” Later CNN updated the piece without explanation.

— January 20, 2017: The network ran a story claiming that Trump’s then-pick for secretary of education, school-choice advocate Betsy DeVos, said that ‘guns should be in schools to protect students from grizzly bears.’ What she really said: During her confirmation hearing was in response to a question about whether schools should have guns on campus; responding to the question, she noted that the issue was “best left to locales and states to decide,” not Washington bureaucrats. She then noted that one school in Wyoming had a fence around it to protect students from roaming wildlife, adding, “I would imagine there’s probably a gun in the school to protect from potential grizzlies,” some of which do in fact live in Wyoming.

— January 31, 2017: In the lead-up to Trump announcing his first Supreme Court pick, network White House correspondent Jeff Zeleny claimed via Twitter that the Trump administration was “setting up [the] Supreme Court announcement as a prime-time contest,” setting up identical Twitter pages for the two most likely nominees, Neil Gorsuch and Thomas Hardiman. It was a sneering tweet meant to make the White House look unflattering. But 30 minutes later he was forced to retract his earlier tweet, saying, “The Twitter accounts…were not set up by the White House, I’ve been told.” The initial lying tweet was shared more than 1,100 times; the correction only about 150 times, leaving far too many people with the impression that his first one was true.

Natural News founder/editor Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, observed this week regarding CNN’s disgustingly frequent fake news regarding all things Trump, as well the other usual suspects:

Through revelations like these, the credibility of CNN, NYT and the Washington Post has utterly collapsed. Only complete fools believe anything they read in these fiction rags. Time after time, these publications have been caught fabricating “anonymous sources” to spin the stories they want to publish, even when those stories are knowingly false.

Rarely do the stories get retracted, and for every retraction that does take place, there are a thousand other fake news stories published on their websites that never get removed or corrected. The mainstream media has literally become the very FAKE NEWS they accused the independent media of pushing.

No truer words.

J.D. Heyes is a senior writer for NaturalNews.com and NewsTarget.com, as well as editor of The National Sentinel.



Reply
Mar 6, 2019 07:20:59   #
debeda
 
maximus wrote:
According to the attached chart there are 7 conservative(or right wing) news agencies or programs, while there are 27 liberal(or left wing) news agencies or programs. so the 7 would have to lie 3.57 times as much as the 27 just to break even.
Plus, what you are accusing Fox of doing is exactly what CNN and MSNBC, at least, do all the time. They make fun of his hair, his skin color, the size of his hands, indirectly the size of his penis, his so called lack of presidential expertise, what he likes to eat, his wife, ( shoes, dialect, dresses, coats, where she came from), and his son, ( the rumors of autism or mental deficiency). Isn't it odd that a Harvard Media Study found that Fox's coverage of Trump was 80% negative while CNN's and NBC's Trump coverage was 93% negative (at least that's what my research told me). So I'm just having difficulty understanding your complaint.

As far as integerty goes, the following list shows that CNN at least has NO integerty at all;

— The most recent example of CNN story fabrication involved Anthony Scaramuci, a member of Trump’s transition team, as well as a a fundraiser and advisor for his campaign. The network published an unsubstantiated story from an “anonymous” source claiming that Scaramuci was under congressional investigation by the Senate for allegedly discussing sanctions with Kirill Dmitriev, chief executive of the $10 billion Russian Direct Investment Fund just four days before the president’s inauguration. It didn’t happen; CNN was forced to retract the story.

The Trump hate at CNN started long before this week, however:

— August 10, 2016: CNN reported that the Secret Service spoke to the Trump campaign about the then-GOP nominee’s comment regarding the Second Amendment. He said: “Hillary wants to abolish — essentially abolish the Second Amendment. By the way, if she gets to pick, if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know.” It was misconstrued (intentionally) to suggest Trump was calling for armed rebellion against Clinton if she won and began appointing Left-wing Supreme Court justices. It didn’t happen.

— September 29, 2016: The network reported that talk radio shock jock Howard Stern said Trump expressed support for the Iraq war on his show in 2002. Stern later denied the CNN report and said he doesn’t know “how CNN came up with” it’s headline that Stern “confirmed” Trump’s support. Trump denied it.

— October 2016: Network Leftie host Chris Cuomo, in riffing on WikiLeaks’ steady release of damning emails about Trump’s rival, Hillary Clinton, told his audience it was illegal for ordinary folks to view those documents, so people would have to rely only on the media to tell them what’s in them (or not tell them). A noted legal expert debunked Cuomo.

— October 30, 2016: The network accused Trump of “encouraging” voters to cast more than one ballot, because he voiced skepticism of mail-in ballots (check the URL of this website, which syndicated the original CNN story, and you can see what the initial headline said). Not true, and the network eventually rewrote the headline and added an editor’s note at the bottom of the original story, claiming the change “more accurately” reflected Trump’s real comments.

— November 22, 2016: During a daytime broadcast, CNN contributor Charles Kaiser claimed that Trump “should never ask his supporters to give the Nazi salute, which he did at a rally in March. That’s not a good idea…” When challenged, he added, “In March he asked his supporters to raise and pledge their support to his candidacy and pledge their support for him. There’s plenty of video of that.” Except, that is not what Trump was doing, calling it ridiculous.

— January 20, 2017: On Inauguration Day, the Trump transition team utilized an old Frank Sinatra hit, “My Way,” in some festivities. CNN reported that his daughter, Nancy Sinatra, of “These Boots Are Made For Walkin’” fame, was not happy about it. She tweeted out later, “That’s not true. I never said that. Why do you lie CNN?” Later CNN updated the piece without explanation.

— January 20, 2017: The network ran a story claiming that Trump’s then-pick for secretary of education, school-choice advocate Betsy DeVos, said that ‘guns should be in schools to protect students from grizzly bears.’ What she really said: During her confirmation hearing was in response to a question about whether schools should have guns on campus; responding to the question, she noted that the issue was “best left to locales and states to decide,” not Washington bureaucrats. She then noted that one school in Wyoming had a fence around it to protect students from roaming wildlife, adding, “I would imagine there’s probably a gun in the school to protect from potential grizzlies,” some of which do in fact live in Wyoming.

— January 31, 2017: In the lead-up to Trump announcing his first Supreme Court pick, network White House correspondent Jeff Zeleny claimed via Twitter that the Trump administration was “setting up [the] Supreme Court announcement as a prime-time contest,” setting up identical Twitter pages for the two most likely nominees, Neil Gorsuch and Thomas Hardiman. It was a sneering tweet meant to make the White House look unflattering. But 30 minutes later he was forced to retract his earlier tweet, saying, “The Twitter accounts…were not set up by the White House, I’ve been told.” The initial lying tweet was shared more than 1,100 times; the correction only about 150 times, leaving far too many people with the impression that his first one was true.

Natural News founder/editor Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, observed this week regarding CNN’s disgustingly frequent fake news regarding all things Trump, as well the other usual suspects:

Through revelations like these, the credibility of CNN, NYT and the Washington Post has utterly collapsed. Only complete fools believe anything they read in these fiction rags. Time after time, these publications have been caught fabricating “anonymous sources” to spin the stories they want to publish, even when those stories are knowingly false.

Rarely do the stories get retracted, and for every retraction that does take place, there are a thousand other fake news stories published on their websites that never get removed or corrected. The mainstream media has literally become the very FAKE NEWS they accused the independent media of pushing.

No truer words.

J.D. Heyes is a senior writer for NaturalNews.com and NewsTarget.com, as well as editor of The National Sentinel.
According to the attached chart there are 7 conser... (show quote)


GOOD article, thanks for sharing!

Reply
Mar 6, 2019 07:27:10   #
maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
 
debeda wrote:
GOOD article, thanks for sharing!


Thanks!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.